| Literature DB >> 30995825 |
Shang-Hao Liu1, Ming-Yuan Shen2, Chen-Feng Kuan3, Hsu-Chiang Kuan4, Cing-Yu Ke5, Chin-Lung Chiang6.
Abstract
Polydimethylsiloxane with hydroxy groups was functionalized to form functionalized polydimethylsiloxane, which subsequently underwent an addition reaction with isophorone diisocyanate to form the prepolymer. Next, 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTS) reacted with 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane (GPTS) to produce bridged polysilsesquioxanes, and sol-gel technology was employed to form hyperbranched polysiloxane nanoparticles with hydroxy groups, APTS-GPTS, which was used as the additive. The hyperbranched polysiloxane and the prepolymer containing NCO functional groups then underwent an addition reaction to produce the hybrid materials. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and 29Si nuclear magnetic resonance were used to characterize the structure of the polyurethane hybrid. Regarding thermal stability, after the hyperbranched polysiloxane nanoparticles was introduced, the integral procedural decomposition temperature increased from 348 °C for polyurethane matrix to 859 °C for the hybrid material. The results reveal that the thermal stability of the hybrid material substantially increased by approximately 247%.Entities:
Keywords: polyurethane (PU), siloxane; sol–gel technology; thermal stability; thermogravimetric analysis
Year: 2019 PMID: 30995825 PMCID: PMC6523278 DOI: 10.3390/polym11040697
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Scheme 1The reaction of Si-PU.
Scheme 2The reaction of APTS-GPTS.
Scheme 3The reaction of Si-PU/APTS-GPTS.
Figure 1FTIR spectra of PDMS(OH), epoxy and FPDMS.
Figure 2FTIR spectra of IPDI, FPDMS and prepolymer.
Figure 3FTIR spectra of APTS, GPTS and APTS-GPTS.
Figure 4FTIR spectra of pre-polymer, APTS-GPTS and Si-PU/APTS-GPTS.
Figure 5Solid-state 29Si NMR spectra of Si-PU/APTS-GPTS.
Distribution of area proportion.
| Sample NO. | Area (%) | Dc (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | ||
| Si-PU/APTS-GPTS | 20.1 | 34.1 | 46.0 |
|
Figure 6TGA curves of Pristine PU and Si-PU/APTS-GPTS composites in N2.
Figure 7Derivative curves of pristine PU and Si-PU/APTS-GPTS composites in N2.
Thermal properties of pristine PU and Si-PU/APTS-GPTS composites.
| Sample NO. | a Td5 (°C) | b Tmax (°C) | c Rmax | IPDT (°C) | C.Y (wt %) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | 2nd | 1st | 2nd | ||||
| Pristine PU | 273 | 343 | - | −36.0 | - | 348 | 0.7 |
| Si-PU | 294 | 349 | 434 | −15.2 | −11.3 | 430 | 3.7 |
| Si-PU/APTS-GPTS 10% | 318 | 392 | 484 | −10.7 | −11.5 | 509 | 5.3 |
| Si-PU/APTS-GPTS 20% | 321 | 397 | 496 | −7.2 | −9.6 | 641 | 13.5 |
| Si-PU/APTS-GPTS 30% | 326 | 510 | - | −8.0 | - | 794 | 21.9 |
| Si-PU/APTS-GPTS 40% | 330 | 404 | 508 | −4.6 | −9.6 | 859 | 24.7 |
a Td5 is the temperature when the weight loss of sample reaches its 5%. b Tmax corresponds to the temperature of maximum degradation rate. c Rmax corresponds to the maximum thermal degradation rate.
Figure 8TGA plot.
Figure 9The IPDT data of pristine PU and Si-PU/APTS-GPTS composites.
Figure 10Comparison of calculated and experimental TGA curves for: (a) Si-PU/APTS-GPTS 10%; (b) Si-PU/ APTS-GPTS 20%; (c) Si-PU/ APTS-GPTS 30%; and (d) Si-PU/ APTS-GPTS 40% composites.
Comparison of calculated and experimental TGA data of Si-PU/APTS-GPTS composites.
| Sample NO. | Cal. | Exp. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Td5 | C.Y. (wt%) at 800 °C | Td5 | C.Y. (wt%) at 800 °C | |
| Si-PU/APTS-GPTS 10% | 268 | 5.0 | 318 | 5.3 |
| Si-PU/APTS-GPTS 20% | 263 | 8.8 | 321 | 13.5 |
| Si-PU/APTS-GPTS 30% | 256 | 12.6 | 326 | 21.9 |
| Si-PU/APTS-GPTS 40% | 242 | 16.4 | 330 | 24.7 |