Literature DB >> 30995321

Effect of pelleting and different feeding programs on growth performance, carcass yield, and nutrient digestibility in broiler chickens.

Andréia Massuquetto1, Josiane C Panisson1, Francielle O Marx1, Diego Surek2, Everton L Krabbe2, Alex Maiorka1.   

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to study the effect of different feeding programs and pelleting on performance, nutrient digestibility, ileal digestible energy (IDE); and carcass yield of broilers from 21 to 35 d of age. In total, 768 male broilers were distributed according to a completely randomized design with 6 treatments and 8 replicates of 16 birds each. The treatments were mash and pelleted diets provided ad libitum, or pelleted and supplied at the same rate (100%) or restricted at 95, 90, and 85% (P100, P95, P90, and P85) of the amount consumed by the birds fed mash diet ad libitum. When supplied ad libitum, the pelleted diet had the highest feed intake and weight gain (WG), better feed conversion ratio (FCR), better feed conversion adjusted for 2.3 kg (AdjFCR, P < 0.001) and caloric conversion (P < 0.001); and higher amount of abdominal fat (P < 0.001) when compared to the control (mash ad libitum). However, there were no effects on nutrient digestibility (P > 0.05). When the pelleted feed was provided in the same amount as in the control group, there were no differences in any of the evaluated parameters (P > 0.05). Limiting pelleted diet to 95, 90, and 85% of free choice mash diet resulted in lower WG (P < 0.001). P90 and P95 treatments resulted in higher dry matter and crude protein digestibility and IDE in relation to the others (P < 0.001). Carcass yield was reduced (P < 0.05) in the birds fed P85 diet. The regression analysis between P100, P95, P90, and P85 showed a linear reduction in WG when restriction was increased (P < 0.01); however, there was a linear increase in the nutrient digestibility (P < 0.001). It is concluded that pelleting improves broiler performance, but these results depend on feed intake. The higher intake provided by pelleting can increase the amount of abdominal fat. Feed intake reduction can result in lower performance and lower carcass and cuts yield in broilers.
© 2019 Poultry Science Association Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  broiler; feed intake; feed restriction; pair-feeding; thermal processing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30995321     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pez176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  4 in total

1.  Feed Restriction Improves Lipid Metabolism by Changing the Structure of the Cecal Microbial Community and Enhances the Meat Quality and Flavor of Bearded Chickens.

Authors:  Jinling Ye; Shouqun Jiang; Zhonggang Cheng; Fayuan Ding; Qiuli Fan; Xiajing Lin; Yibing Wang; Zhongyong Gou
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Exploiting bacterial outer membrane vesicles as a cross-protective vaccine candidate against avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC).

Authors:  Rujiu Hu; Jing Li; Yuezhen Zhao; Hua Lin; Liu Liang; Mimi Wang; Haojing Liu; Yuna Min; Yupeng Gao; Mingming Yang
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 5.328

3.  Graded methionine dietary inclusions influence growth performance and apparent ileal amino acid digestibility coefficients and disappearance rates in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Shemil P Macelline; Peter V Chrystal; Leon R McQuade; Bernard V Mclnerney; Yangsu Kim; Yumin Bao; Peter H Selle; Sonia Y Liu
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2021-10-18

Review 4.  A review of heat stress in chickens. Part II: Insights into protein and energy utilization and feeding.

Authors:  Jean-Rémi Teyssier; Giorgio Brugaletta; Federico Sirri; Sami Dridi; Samuel J Rochell
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 4.755

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.