| Literature DB >> 30994776 |
Lima Lorena Ferreira1, Alencar Ana Helena Gonçalves de1, Daniel de Almeida Decurcio1, Julio Almeida Silva1, Isabella Negro Favarão1, Marco Antônio Zaiden Loureiro1, Fernando Branco Barletta2, Carlos Estrela1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess pulp oxygen saturation levels (SaO2) in maxillary central incisors after dental bleaching.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30994776 PMCID: PMC6459226 DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0442
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Oral Sci ISSN: 1678-7757 Impact factor: 2.698
Figure 1– A) Pulse oximeter and B) sensor with specially manufactured adapter
Figure 2Flow diagram of study inclusion
Demographic and clinical characteristics of study participants
| Participants | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 20 | 13 | 13 | |
| Sex (%) | ||||
| Women | 57.14 | 75.0 | 61.54 | 53.85 |
| Man | 42.86 | 25.0 | 38.46 | 46.15 |
| Age group | 18-24 years | 18-23 years | 18-27 years | 18-23 years |
| Systemic disease | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mean fingertip oxygen saturation, % | 97.48 | 96.80 | 97.12 | 97.34 |
| Healthy maxillary central incisors, n | 28 | 40 | 26 | 26 |
| Positive thermal pulp test (cold) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Mean pulp oxygen saturation and difference (%) at baseline (T0) and during and after dental whitening procedures in each experimental group
| Group/Time point | Mean | SD | Difference in means | Occurrence | 95% CI of difference in means | P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower limit | Upper limit | ||||||||
| 1 | T0 | T1 | 81.96 | 4.47 | 2.32 | Decrease | -0.68 | 5.33 | 0.444 |
| T2 | 85.39 | 3.27 | -1.11 | Increase | -3.58 | 1.37 | 0.999 | ||
| T3 | 84.09 | 4.01 | 0.20 | Decrease | -2.79 | 3.18 | 0.999 | ||
| Mean 84.29 SD 3.77 | T4 | 83.34 | 2.70 | 0.95 | Decrease | -2.08 | 3.97 | 0.999 | |
| T5 | 84.57 | 4.15 | -0.29 | Increase | -3.87 | 3.30 | 0.999 | ||
| T6 | 85.46 | 3.34 | -1.18 | Increase | -3.89 | 1.53 | 0.999 | ||
| T7 | 86.55 | 2.94 | -2.27 | Increase | -4.68 | 0.14 | 0.093 | ||
| 2 | T0 | T1 | 82.06 | 4.05 | 2.31 | Decrease | -0.41 | 5.03 | 0.222 |
| T2 | 84.51 | 3.51 | -0.14 | Increase | -2.53 | 2.25 | 0.999 | ||
| T3 | 85.20 | 3.23 | -0.83 | Increase | -3.04 | 1.39 | 0.999 | ||
| Mean 84.38 SD 3.56 | T4 | 84.54 | 2.96 | -0.16 | Increase | -2.42 | 2.09 | 0.999 | |
| T5 | 84.89 | 3.23 | -0.51 | Increase | -2.84 | 1.81 | 0.999 | ||
| T6 | 85.31 | 3.03 | -0.94 | Increase | -3.21 | 1.33 | 0.999 | ||
| T7 | 86.60 | 2.09 | -2.23 | Increase | -4.04 | -0.41 | 0.004* | ||
| 3 | T0 | T1 | 82.19 | 5.17 | 2.60 | Decrease | -1.17 | 6.36 | 0.875 |
| T2 | 85.00 | 5.74 | -0.21 | Increase | -4.47 | 4.05 | 0.999 | ||
| T3 | 86.54 | 4.32 | -1.75 | Increase | -5.06 | 1.56 | 0.999 | ||
| Mean 84.79 SD 4.13 | T4 | 84.04 | 4.19 | 0.75 | Decrease | -1.94 | 3.44 | 0.999 | |
| T5 | 85.94 | 3.23 | -1.15 | Increase | -4.21 | 1.90 | 0.999 | ||
| T6 | 84.27 | 2.33 | 0.52 | Decrease | -2.38 | 3.42 | 0.999 | ||
| T7 | 85.71 | 2.53 | -0.92 | Increase | -3.58 | 1.74 | 0.999 | ||
| 4 | T0 | T1 | 81.15 | 3.96 | 4.67 | Decrease | 0.72 | 8.63 | 0.006* |
| T2 | 84.37 | 3.81 | 1.46 | Decrease | -2.87 | 5.79 | 0.999 | ||
| T3 | 84.38 | 3.47 | 1.44 | Decrease | -2.54 | 5.43 | 0.999 | ||
| Mean 85.83 SD 4.56 | T4 | 85.33 | 2.79 | 0.50 | Decrease | -2.68 | 3.68 | 0.999 | |
| T5 | 86.87 | 2.77 | -1.04 | Increase | -3.85 | 1.77 | 0.999 | ||
| T6 | 86.85 | 2.55 | -1.02 | Increase | -3.95 | 1.91 | 0.999 | ||
| T7 | 87.15 | 1.72 | -1.33 | Increase | -4.50 | 1.85 | 0.999 | ||
(SD, standard deviation; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval for difference in means; *Statistically significant difference)
Figure 3Graphical representation of pulp oxygen saturation level (%) at baseline, variations observed during whitening procedures, and levels at the end of the intervention in Group 1 (blue), Group 2 (green), Group 3 (red), and Group 4 (yellow)