Literature DB >> 30994233

Combination of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage in malignant hilar biliary obstruction.

Pradermchai Kongkam1,2, Abbas Ali Tasneem1,3, Rungsun Rerknimitr1.   

Abstract

Adequate biliary drainage (BD), defined as more than 50% of liver volume drained, is an ideal BD method in patients with advanced and unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with multi-segmental BD is technically challenging. ERCP with percutaneous biliary drainage (PTBD) or PTBD alone has cumbersome maintenance of PTBD line and external bag. The utility of EUS-guided BD (EUS-BD) has risen significantly over last 5 years mostly in the clinical setting of distal bile duct obstruction. Information on EUS-BD for malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) is thus far limited to only two small studies. This review suggests a new concept of a combination of ERCP and EUS-BD (CERES) for BD in MHBO as a primary BD method whereby ERCP with a single self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) is placed into either the right or the left intrahepatic bile duct (IHD). If SEMS is placed in the right biliary system, EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) can subsequently be carried out. However, if the stent is placed into the left biliary system, EUS-guided hepaticoduodenostomy (EUS-HDS) is done. For MHBO with non-functioning right lobe of the liver, EUS-HGS is carried out after failed ERCP, or primary HGS can be carried out in the left lobe of liver. For MHBO with non-functioning left lobe of the liver, EUS-HDS is carried out after failed transpapillary stenting of the right lobe by ERCP. Based on our experience, CERES is promising as it can fulfil gaps of both PTBD and ERCP by allowing internal drainage that can circumvent the inconvenience associated with PTBD and offer higher technical success rate compared to ERCP with bilateral SEMS placement.
© 2019 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERCP; EUS; endosonography; hilar cholangiocarcinoma; perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30994233     DOI: 10.1111/den.13371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Endosc        ISSN: 0915-5635            Impact factor:   7.559


  4 in total

Review 1.  Personalized Endoscopy in Complex Malignant Hilar Biliary Strictures.

Authors:  Ivo Boškoski; Tommaso Schepis; Andrea Tringali; Pietro Familiari; Vincenzo Bove; Fabia Attili; Rosario Landi; Vincenzo Perri; Guido Costamagna
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-01-29

2.  Comparison of radiation exposure between endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage and transpapillary drainage by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for pancreatobiliary diseases.

Authors:  Mamoru Takenaka; Makoto Hosono; Madan M Rehani; Yasutaka Chiba; Rei Ishikawa; Ayana Okamoto; Tomohiro Yamazaki; Atsushi Nakai; Shunsuke Omoto; Kosuke Minaga; Ken Kamata; Kentaro Yamao; Shiro Hayashi; Tsutomu Nishida; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 6.337

Review 3.  Practical Tips for Safe and Successful Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy: A State-of-the-Art Technical Review.

Authors:  Saburo Matsubara; Keito Nakagawa; Kentaro Suda; Takeshi Otsuka; Masashi Oka; Sumiko Nagoshi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Comparison of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy and percutaneous drainage for distal biliary obstruction: A multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Tarek Sawas; Natashay J Bailey; Kit Ying Kitty Au Yeung; Theodore W James; Sumana Reddy; Chad J Fleming; Neil B Marya; Andrew C Storm; Barham K Abu Dayyeh; Bret T Petersen; John A Martin; Michael J Levy; Todd H Baron; Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh; Vinay Chandrasekhara
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.275

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.