Literature DB >> 30993807

Measurement of physical activity in clinical practice using accelerometers.

D Arvidsson1, J Fridolfsson1, M Börjesson1,2,3.   

Abstract

Accelerometers are commonly used in clinical and epidemiological research for more detailed measures of physical activity and to target the limitations of self-report methods. Sensors are attached at the hip, wrist and thigh, and the acceleration data are processed and calibrated in different ways to determine activity intensity, body position and/or activity type. Simple linear modelling can be used to assess activity intensity from hip and thigh data, whilst more advanced machine-learning modelling is to prefer for the wrist. The thigh position is most optimal to assess body position and activity type using machine-learning modelling. Frequency filtering and measurement resolution needs to be considered for correct assessment of activity intensity. Simple physical activity measures and statistical methods are mostly used to investigate relationship with health, but do not take advantage of all information provided by accelerometers and do not consider all components of the physical activity behaviour and their interrelationships. More advanced statistical methods are suggested that analyse patterns of multiple measures of physical activity to demonstrate stronger and more specific relationships with health. However, evaluations of accelerometer methods show considerable measurement errors, especially at individual level, which interferes with their use in clinical research and practice. Therefore, better objective methods are needed with improved data processing and calibration techniques, exploring both simple linear and machine-learning alternatives. Development and implementation of accelerometer methods into clinical research and practice requires interdisciplinary collaboration to cover all aspects contributing to useful and accurate measures of physical activity behaviours related to health.
© 2019 The Association for the Publication of the Journal of Internal Medicine.

Keywords:  accelerometer; clinical; measurement; physical activity; protocol

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30993807     DOI: 10.1111/joim.12908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intern Med        ISSN: 0954-6820            Impact factor:   8.989


  35 in total

Review 1.  Use of Wearable Technology to Measure Activity in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Meir T Marmor; Bernd Grimm; Andrew M Hanflik; Peter H Richter; Sureshan Sivananthan; Seth Robert Yarboro; Benedikt J Braun
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 1.033

2.  Is there an association between total physical activity level and VO2max among fitness club members? A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Elene Mauseth Tangen; Christina Gjestvang; Trine Stensrud; Lene A H Haakstad
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-06-17

3.  Sedentary Patterns and Sit-to-Stand Transitions in Open Learning Spaces and Conventional Classrooms among Primary School Students.

Authors:  Jani Hartikainen; Eero A Haapala; Arja Sääkslahti; Anna-Maija Poikkeus; Taija Finni
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Visual Impairment and Objectively Measured Physical Activity in Middle-Aged and Older Adults.

Authors:  Yurun Cai; Jennifer A Schrack; Hang Wang; Jian-Yu E; Amal A Wanigatunga; Yuri Agrawal; Jacek K Urbanek; Eleanor M Simonsick; Luigi Ferrucci; Bonnielin K Swenor
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  Measurement of sedentary time and physical activity in rheumatoid arthritis: an ActiGraph and activPAL™ validation study.

Authors:  Ciara M O'Brien; Joan L Duda; George D Kitas; Jet J C S Veldhuijzen van Zanten; George S Metsios; Sally A M Fenton
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.631

6.  Assessing telehealth interventions for physical activity and sedentary behavior self-management in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: An integrative review.

Authors:  Chelsea Howland; Bonnie Wakefield
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  Effectiveness of a coordinated support system linking public hospitals to a health coaching service compared with usual care at discharge for patients with chronic low back pain: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Emma K Ho; Manuela L Ferreira; Adrian Bauman; Paul W Hodges; Christopher G Maher; Milena Simic; Rachael L Morton; Chris Lonsdale; Qiang Li; Melissa T Baysari; Anita B Amorim; Dragana Ceprnja; Ornella Clavisi; Mark Halliday; Matthew Jennings; Alice Kongsted; Katherine Maka; Kate Reid; Tahlia Reynolds; Paulo H Ferreira
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  High-intensity activity is more strongly associated with metabolic health in children compared to sedentary time: a cross-sectional study of the I.Family cohort.

Authors:  Jonatan Fridolfsson; Christoph Buck; Monica Hunsberger; Joanna Baran; Fabio Lauria; Denes Molnar; Luis A Moreno; Mats Börjesson; Lauren Lissner; Daniel Arvidsson
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  Foot orthoses for people with rheumatoid arthritis, involving quantitative and qualitative outcomes: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Laura Ramos-Petersen; Christoper J Nester; Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron; Ana Belen Ortega-Avila
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-19       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Stronger Association between High Intensity Physical Activity and Cardiometabolic Health with Improved Assessment of the Full Intensity Range Using Accelerometry.

Authors:  Jonatan Fridolfsson; Mats Börjesson; Elin Ekblom-Bak; Örjan Ekblom; Daniel Arvidsson
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.