Literature DB >> 30993724

The sandwich structure of keratinous layers controls the form and growth orientation of chicken rhinotheca.

Yukine Urano1, Yasunobu Sugimoto2, Kyo Tanoue3, Ryoko Matsumoto4, Soichiro Kawabe5, Tomoyuki Ohashi6, Shin-Ichi Fujiwara7.   

Abstract

The upper beak bone of birds is known to be overlain by the rhinotheca, which is composed of the horny sheath of keratinous layers. However, the details of the structure and growth pattern of the rhinotheca are yet to be understood. In this study, the microstructure of the rhinotheca from chicken specimens of different growth stages (ranging from 1 to ~ 80 days old) was analyzed using a combination of thin section and scanning electron microscopy observations, and small-angle X-ray scattering analysis. We found that the rhinotheca comprises three different layers - outer, intermediate, and inner layers - throughout its growth. The outer layer arises from the proximal portion of the beak bone and covers the dorsal surface of the rhinotheca, whereas the intermediate and inner layers originate in the distal portion of the beak bone and underlie the outer layer. This tri-layered structure of the rhinotheca was also observed in wild bird specimens (grey wagtail, king quail, and brown dipper). On the median plane, micro-layers making up the outer and inner layers are bedded nearly parallel to the rostral bone at the base. However, more distally positioned micro-layers of the outer layer are more anteverted distally. The micro-layers of the intermediate layer are bedded nearly perpendicular to those of the outer and inner layers on the median plane. The growth of micro-layers in the intermediate layer adds thickness to the rhinotheca, which causes the difference in profile between the beak bone and the rhinotheca in the distal portion of the beak. Moreover, the entire intermediate layer grows distally as new proximal micro-layers form. The outer layer is dragged distally by the intermediate layer as a result of its distal growth, for the three layers are closely packed to each other at their boundaries. Furthermore, the occurrence of the intermediate and inner layers in the distal portion of the rostral bone may be because the distal end of the beak is frequently used and worn, and the rhinotheca therefore needs to be replaced more frequently at the distal end. The rhinotheca structure described here will be an important and useful factor in the reconstruction of the beaks of birds in extinct taxa.
© 2019 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beak; birds; keratin; microstructure; reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30993724      PMCID: PMC6637450          DOI: 10.1111/joa.12998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  24 in total

1.  An autoradiographic study of equine hoof growth.

Authors:  C C Pollitt
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  Edentulism, beaks, and biomechanical innovations in the evolution of theropod dinosaurs.

Authors:  Stephan Lautenschlager; Lawrence M Witmer; Perle Altangerel; Emily J Rayfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evidence of accelerated beak growth associated with avian keratin disorder in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus).

Authors:  Caroline Van Hemert; Colleen M Handel; Todd M O'Hara
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.535

4.  Dinosaurian growth rates and bird origins.

Authors:  K Padian; A J de Ricqlès; J R Horner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-07-26       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  How does the curvature of the upper beak bone reflect the overlying rhinotheca morphology?

Authors:  Yukine Urano; Kyo Tanoue; Ryoko Matsumoto; Soichiro Kawabe; Tomoyuki Ohashi; Shin-Ichi Fujiwara
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 1.804

6.  Structure of white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) horn investigated by X-ray computed tomography and histology with implications for growth and external form.

Authors:  Tobin L Hieronymus; Lawrence M Witmer; Ryan C Ridgely
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.804

7.  Herbivorous ecomorphology and specialization patterns in theropod dinosaur evolution.

Authors:  Lindsay E Zanno; Peter J Makovicky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Structural basis for the fracture toughness of the shell of the conch Strombus gigas.

Authors:  S Kamat; X Su; R Ballarini; A H Heuer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-29       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Microanatomy of passerine hard-cornified tissues: beak and claw structure of the black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus).

Authors:  Caroline Van Hemert; Colleen M Handel; John E Blake; Rhonda M Swor; Todd M O'Hara
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 1.804

10.  Is Beak Morphology in Darwin's Finches Tuned to Loading Demands?

Authors:  Joris Soons; Annelies Genbrugge; Jeffrey Podos; Dominique Adriaens; Peter Aerts; Joris Dirckx; Anthony Herrel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Change in beak overhangs of cliff swallows over 40 years: Partly a response to parasites?

Authors:  Gigi S Wagnon; Olivia M Pletcher; Charles R Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.