Literature DB >> 30992595

Attitudes towards antimicrobial use and factors associated with antimicrobial use in western Canadian cow-calf herds.

Cheryl L Waldner1, Sarah Parker1, Sheryl Gow1, Devon J Wilson1, John R Campbell1.   

Abstract

One hundred cow-calf producers in western Canada were surveyed to determine their perceptions regarding antimicrobial use (AMU) and how these perceptions and other herd management factors were associated with AMU. Veterinarians were the most important source of AMU information. Half of the producers considered antimicrobial resistance (AMR) when choosing antimicrobials, while 24% considered the influence of AMU on AMR in human health. Younger producers < 30 y were most likely to consider AMR when choosing antimicrobials. Injectable products were used for disease prevention in 17% of herds; 5% used medically important antimicrobials in feed and 6% in water. Use of injectable antimicrobials of very high importance to human health was reported in 34% of herds. Producers with higher calf mortality were more likely to report AMU in feed or water. The use of Health Canada Category I antimicrobials was most common when calves were retained after weaning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30992595      PMCID: PMC6417609     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Vet J        ISSN: 0008-5286            Impact factor:   1.008


  8 in total

1.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Predictors of differences in the perception of antimicrobial resistance risk in the treatment of sick, at-risk, and high-risk feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Jie-Sheng Jan; Wm Alex McIntosh; Wesley Dean; H Morgan Scott
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 2.670

3.  Constraint approaches to the estimation of relative risk.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Tang; Philip G Jones; Liangrui Sun; Suzanne V Arnold; John A Spertus
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Survey of Saskatchewan beef cattle producers regarding management practices and veterinary service usage.

Authors:  Murray Jelinski; John Campbell; Steven Hendrick; Cheryl Waldner
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.008

5.  Metrics for quantifying antimicrobial use in beef feedlots.

Authors:  Katharine M Benedict; Sheryl P Gow; Richard J Reid-Smith; Calvin W Booker; Paul S Morley
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.008

6.  Survey of western Canadian beef producers regarding calf-hood diseases, management practices, and veterinary service usage.

Authors:  Cheryl Waldner; Murray D Jelinski; Katelyn McIntyre-Zimmer
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.008

7.  Producer attitudes and practices related to antimicrobial use in beef cattle in Tennessee.

Authors:  Alice L Green; L Rand Carpenter; Darryl E Edmisson; Clyde D Lane; Matt G Welborn; Fred M Hopkins; David A Bemis; John R Dunn
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 1.936

8.  Antimicrobial drug use and reason for treatment in 203 western Canadian cow-calf herds during calving season.

Authors:  Sheryl P Gow; Cheryl L Waldner
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 2.670

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Values and Risk Perception Shape Canadian Dairy Farmers' Attitudes toward Prudent Use of Antimicrobials.

Authors:  Claudia Cobo-Angel; Basem Gohar; Stephen J LeBlanc
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.