Literature DB >> 30992298

Comparative Analysis of AR Variant AR-V567es mRNA Detection Systems Reveals Eminent Variability and Questions the Role as a Clinical Biomarker in Prostate Cancer.

Christof Bernemann1, Verena Humberg2, Barbara Thielen2, Julie Steinestel2,3, Xin Chen4, Stefan Duensing4, Andres J Schrader2, Martin Boegemann2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Androgen receptor splice variants are known to facilitate resistance of prostate cancer cells toward antihormonal therapies. However, detection of the most prominent variant, AR-V7, on its own, is not sufficiently accurate for prediction of response. Thus, simultaneous detection of other variants might improve prediction. AR-V567es has been shown to be expressed in late stages of prostate cancer. Yet, there have been discrepant results regarding incidence of AR-V567es. We therefore aimed to perform a comprehensive comparison of different detection approaches for AR-V567es mRNA. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We compared a custom-made, probe-based PCR assay with 6 published AR-V567es detection PCR assays in distinct samples, that is, cancer cell lines, LuCaP xenografts, primary and metastatic tumor samples, and circulating tumor cells (CTC).
RESULTS: Using distinct approaches, we concordantly detected expression of AR-V567es in only three of 45 samples (LuCaP xenografts 86.2 and 136s2 as well as one CTC sample). We observed varying results in all other samples. Specificity analysis displayed nonspecific binding of 5 previously published PCR assays to AR full-length mRNA in the absence of AR-V567es.
CONCLUSIONS: Validation of biomarker detection approaches is one of the most critical steps before transfer into clinical application. By performing comparative analysis of different detection approaches, we revealed eminent variability among previously described systems. Furthermore, we demonstrate an overestimation of AR-V567es in prostate cancer, presumably due to nonspecific detection of AR-FL mRNA. Therefore, any correlation between AR-V567es expression and clinical responses is highly doubtful and does not reflect the biological nature of the disease. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30992298     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-4276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  6 in total

1.  Considerations for AR-V7 testing in clinical routine practice.

Authors:  Christof Bernemann; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Andres Jan Schrader
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

2.  AR Structural Variants and Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Laura Cato; Maysoun Shomali
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  Comparison of circulating tumor cells and AR-V7 as clinical biomarker in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Katrin Schlack; Konstantin Seitzer; Neele Wüstmann; Verena Humberg; Norbert Grundmann; Julie Steinestel; Dorothee Tiedje; Kambiz Rahbar; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Martin Bögemann; Andres J Schrader; Christof Bernemann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Molecular analysis of circulating tumor cells of metastatic castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients receiving 177Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy.

Authors:  Katharina Kessel; Robert Seifert; Matthias Weckesser; Wolfgang Roll; Verena Humberg; Katrin Schlack; Martin Bögemann; Christof Bernemann; Kambiz Rahbar
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 5.  Using biochemistry and biophysics to extinguish androgen receptor signaling in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Irfan Asangani; Ian A Blair; Gregory Van Duyne; Vincent J Hilser; Vera Moiseenkova-Bell; Stephen Plymate; Cynthia Sprenger; A Joshua Wand; Trevor M Penning
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  The Prognostic Value of Liquid Biopsies for Benefit of Salvage Radiotherapy in Relapsed Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Natalia V Bogdanova; Hoda Radmanesh; Dhanya Ramachandran; Anne Caroline Knoechelmann; Hans Christiansen; Thorsten Derlin; Christoph Alexander Joachim von Klot; Roland Merten; Christoph Henkenberens
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 6.575

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.