| Literature DB >> 30992060 |
Erdem Degirmenci1, Kutay Engin Ozturan2, Abdullah Alper Sahin3, Fahri Yilmaz4, Yasin Emre Kaya2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microfracture and scaffold application in the treatment of osteochondral defects is still one of the most frequently used methods in the clinic. The most important step in this treatment method is the stabilization of fibrin clot. Tranexamic acid (TA) is an antifibrinolytic agent commonly used in orthopedic surgery in recent years. This study evaluated the effect of local TA application on healing of experimentally induced osteochondral defects on rabbits.Entities:
Keywords: A-cellular scaffold; Microfracture; Osteochondral defect; Tranexamic acid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30992060 PMCID: PMC6469115 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1144-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Fig. 1Surgical method. a Bicondylar cylindrical osteochondral defect. b A-cellular scaffold application to medial femoral condyle. c Intraarticular TA application
Fig. 2Macroscopic and microscopic views of the samples (control group: a, c, e, g, i; TA group: b, d, f, h, j). a, b Macroscopic views of samples at fourth week. c, d Microscopic views of samples at fourth week. e, f Macroscopic views of samples at eighth week. g, h Microscopic views of samples at eighth week. i, j Microscopic view of samples stained with safranin-o at eighth week
Histologic scale which graded cartilage samples
| Score | Fourth week | Eighth week | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA | Control | TA | Control | ||
| Cell morphology | |||||
| Hyaline cartilage | 4 | 1 | |||
| Mostly hyaline cartilage | 3 | 4 | 2 | ||
| Hyaline and fibrocartilage | 2 | 2 | 5 | 4 | |
| Mostly fibrocartilage | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Mostly non-cartilage | 0 | 4 | 6 | ||
| Matrix staining | |||||
| Same as the normal area | 4 | ||||
| Slightly reduced | 3 | 6 | |||
| Reduced | 2 | 4 | |||
| Significantly reduced | 1 | 2 | 4 | ||
| None | 0 | 6 | 8 | 6 | |
| Surface regularity | |||||
| Smooth | 2 | 2 | 6 | 5 | |
| Slightly Irregular | 1 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Irregular | 0 | 1 | 4 | ||
| Thickness of the cartilage (%) | |||||
| 100 | 4 | ||||
| 75 | 3 | 2 | |||
| 50 | 2 | 5 | |||
| 25 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
| 0 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 7 | |
| Bonding | |||||
| Both edges integrated | 2 | 2 | 4 | ||
| One edge integrated | 1 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 3 |
| Both edges not integrated | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
Mean and median O’ Driscoll scores of the two groups
| Control | Tranexamic acid |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fourth week | Medial | Mean ± SD | 1.50 ± 1.73 | 4.25 ± 4.35 | 0.263 |
| Lateral | Mean ± SD | 1.25 ± 1.50 | 2.50 ± 1.29 | ||
|
| 0.259 | 0.390 | |||
| Eighth week | Medial | Mean ± SD | 4.20 ± 3.03 | 9.60 ± 3.58 | 0.880 |
| Lateral | Mean ± SD | 3.00 ± 1.41 | 10.60 ± 1.34 | ||
|
| 0.002 | 0.124 | |||