Literature DB >> 3099190

Induction of SOS and adaptive responses by alkylating agents in Escherichia coli mutants deficient in 3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylase activities.

R Costa de Oliveira, J Laval, S Boiteux.   

Abstract

The induction of SOS and adaptive responses by alkylating agents was studied in Escherichia coli mutants tagA and alkA deficient in 3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylase activities. The SOS response was measured using an sfiA::lacZ operon fusion. The sfiA operon, in the double mutant tagA alkA, is induced at 5-50-fold lower concentrations of all tested methylating and ethylating compounds, as compared to the wild-type strain. In all cases, the tagA mutation, which inactivates the constitutive and specific 3-alkyladenine-DNA glycosylase I (TagI), sensitizes the strain to the SOS response. The sensitization effect of alkA mutation, which inactivates the inducible 3-alkyladenine-DNA glycosylase II (TagII), is observed under conditions which allow the induction of the adaptive response. We conclude that the persistence of 3-methyladenine and 3-ethyladenine residues in DNA most likely leads to the induction of the SOS functions. In contrast, the adaptive response, evaluated by O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase activity in cell extracts, was not affected by either tagA or alkA mutations. The results suggest that the SOS and adaptive responses use different alkylation products as an inducing "signal". However, adaptation protein TagII inhibits the induction of the SOS response to some extent, due to its action at the level of signal production. Finally, we provide conditions to improve short-term bacterial tests for the detection of genotoxic alkylating agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3099190     DOI: 10.1016/0167-8817(87)90040-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  9 in total

1.  Potential role of proteolysis in the control of UvrABC incision.

Authors:  P R Caron; L Grossman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-10-25       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  DNA lesions that block DNA replication are responsible for the dnaA induction caused by DNA damage.

Authors:  A Quiñones; W R Jueterbock; W Messer
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1991-12

3.  Potential role of proteolysis in the control of UvrABC incision.

Authors:  P R Caron; L Grossman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  The frequency of MMS-induced, umuDC-dependent, mutations declines during starvation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  E Grzesiuk; C Janion
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1994-11-15

5.  Analysis of the SOS response of Vibrio and other bacteria with multiple chromosomes.

Authors:  Neus Sanchez-Alberola; Susana Campoy; Jordi Barbé; Ivan Erill
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 6.  Bacterial genotoxicity bioreporters.

Authors:  Alva Biran; Sharon Yagur-Kroll; Rami Pedahzur; Sebastian Buchinger; Georg Reifferscheid; Hadar Ben-Yoav; Yosi Shacham-Diamand; Shimshon Belkin
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 5.813

7.  DNA Polymerases ImuC and DinB Are Involved in DNA Alkylation Damage Tolerance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas putida.

Authors:  Tatjana Jatsenko; Julia Sidorenko; Signe Saumaa; Maia Kivisaar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Complete Genome Sequence of the Wolbachia wAlbB Endosymbiont of Aedes albopictus.

Authors:  Amit Sinha; Zhiru Li; Luo Sun; Clotilde K S Carlow
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Induction of dnaN and dnaQ gene expression in Escherichia coli by alkylation damage to DNA.

Authors:  A Quiñones; J Kaasch; M Kaasch; W Messer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 11.598

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.