| Literature DB >> 30991704 |
Nader El-Bagoury1,2, Sameh I Ahmed3,4, Ola Ahmed Abu Ali5, Shimaa El-Hadad6, Ahmed M Fallatah7, G A M Mersal8,9, Mohamed M Ibrahim10,11, Joanna Wysocka12, Jacek Ryl13, Rabah Boukherroub14, Mohammed A Amin15,16.
Abstract
The effect of microstructure and chemistry on the kinetics of passive layer growth and passivity breakdown of some Ti-based alloys, namely Ti-6Al-4V, Ti-6Al-7Nb and TC21 alloys, was studied. The rate of pitting corrosion was evaluated using cyclic polarization measurements. Chronoamperometry was applied to assess the passive layer growth kinetics and breakdown. Microstructure influence on the uniform corrosion rate of these alloys was also investigated employing dynamic electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (DEIS). Corrosion studies were performed in 0.9% NaCl solution at 37 °C, and the obtained results were compared with ultrapure Ti (99.99%). The different phases of the microstructure were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Chemical composition and chemistry of the corroded surfaces were studied using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis. For all studied alloys, the microstructure consisted of α matrix, which was strengthened by β phase. The highest and the lowest values of the β phase's volume fraction were recorded for TC21 and Ti-Al-Nb alloys, respectively. The susceptibility of the investigated alloys toward pitting corrosion was enhanced following the sequence: Ti-6Al-7Nb < Ti-6Al-4V << TC21. Ti-6Al-7Nb alloy recorded the lowest pitting corrosion resistance (Rpit) among studied alloys, approaching that of pure Ti. The obvious changes in the microstructure of these alloys, together with XPS findings, were adopted to interpret the pronounced variation in the corrosion behavior of these materials.Entities:
Keywords: microstructure; passivity breakdown; pitting corrosion; titanium-based alloys
Year: 2019 PMID: 30991704 PMCID: PMC6514787 DOI: 10.3390/ma12081233
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical composition of investigated Ti alloys.
| Alloy | Chemical Composition, wt % | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | V | Nb | Sn | Zr | Mo | Cr | Si | Fe | C | N | O | Ti | |
| Ti-6Al-4V | 5.85 | 3.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.14 | Bal. |
| Ti-6Al-7Nb | 6.39 | 0.00 | 7.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.12 | |
| TC21 | 5.89 | 0.00 | 2.41 | 2.51 | 1.59 | 2.27 | 1.58 | 0.067 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.13 | |
Figure 1Microstructure of the three investigated Ti alloys: (a) Ti-Al-V; (b) Ti-Al-Nb; and (c) TC21.
Figure 2Morphology of β phase in TC21 alloy: (a) acicular-like structure; and (b) blocky shaped structure.
Volume fraction of α and β phases in the investigated Ti based alloys.
| Alloy | Volume Fraction, % | (α/ β) Ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| α Phase | β Phase | ||
| Pure Ti | 100 | 0 | -- |
| Ti-6Al-4V | 65 | 35 | 1.86 |
| Ti-6Al-7Nb | 77 | 23 | 3.35 |
| TC21 | 48 | 52 | 0.92 |
and [Mo]eq for the investigated alloys [26,27].
| Alloy | [Al]eq | [Mo]eq | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ti-6Al-4V | 8.05 | 2.64 | 3.05 |
| Ti-6Al-7Nb | 8.59 | 2.18 | 3.94 |
| TC21 | 8.59 | 5.04 | 1.71 |
Chemical composition (wt %) of different phases in Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-6Al-7Nb alloys.
| Phase | Ti-6Al-4V Alloy (wt %) | Ti-6Al-7Nb Alloy (wt %) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | V | Ti | Al | Nb | Ti | |
| α | 5.93 | 3.24 | 90.83 | 6.60 | 7.65 | 85.75 |
| β | 5.57 | 8.04 | 86.39 | 4.88 | 13.79 | 81.33 |
Chemical composition (at %) of different phases in TC21 alloy.
| Phase | Chemical Composition, at % | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | Cr | Mo | Sn | Zr | Nb | Ti | |
| α | 6.38 | 1.08 | 1.82 | 2.45 | 1.95 | 1.98 | 84.34 |
| β | 6.21 | 1.71 | 2.62 | 2.24 | 1.11 | 2.39 | 83.72 |
Figure 3XRD diffraction patterns recorded for the Ti-6Al-4V, Ti-6Al-7Nb and TC21 samples.
The structural and microstructural parameters of the three alloys obtained by the Rietveld adjustment of the XRD patterns. Wt. % is the weight percentage of each phase, a and c are the cell parameters of the crystal lattice, D is the average crystallite-size and ε is the lattice microstrain.
|
| ||||
| α-Ti ( | β-Ti ( | |||
| Wt. % | 67 (5) | 33 (5) | ||
| a (Å) | 2.9338 (1) | 3.2353 (9) | ||
| c (Å) | 4.6780 (3) | |||
| D (nm) | 76 (3) | 67 (4) | ||
| ε | 0.00232 (1) | 0.00216 (4) | ||
|
| ||||
| α-Ti ( | β-Ti ( | TiO ( | Nb6O ( | |
| Wt. % | 73 (6) | 20 (5) | 5 (2) | 2 (1) |
| a (Å) | 2.9397 (4) | 3.2437 (5) | 4.1567 (1) | 3.3945 (6) |
| c (Å) | 4.6969 (3) | 3.249 (3) | ||
| D (nm) | 67 (2) | 53 (2) | 79 (12) | 100 (2) |
| ε | 0.0028 (1) | 0.024 (20) | 0.0026 (1) | 0.00010 (7) |
|
| ||||
| α-Ti ( | β-Ti ( | |||
| Wt. % | 49 (9) | 51 (9) | ||
| a (Å) | 2.9407 (7) | 3.2521 (14) | ||
| c (Å) | 4.6925 (16) | |||
| D (nm) | 63 (2) | 70 (3) | ||
| ε | 0.0021 (2) | 0.0035 (3) | ||
Figure 4The calculated (red line) and recorded (black dots) diffraction patterns for the three alloys as obtained from the Rietveld adjustments using the MAUD program; the positions of the Bragg reflections of each phase and the difference between the calculated and observed patterns are also presented at the bottom.
Figure 5Cathodic and anodic polarization curves recorded for the three tested alloys in comparison with pure Ti, after seven days of exposure in 0.9% NaCl solution at a scan rate of 0.5 mV s−1 at 37 °C.
Figure 6Bode impedance plots on Days 2 and 7 of exposure, recorded for: (a) pure Ti; and three tested alloys: (b) TC21; (c) Ti-6Al-4V; and (d) Ti-6Al-7Nb. Studies performed at Ecorr in 0.9%NaCl solution at 37 °C. Points represent experimental results while the solid line was calculated based on R(QR) EEC.
Figure 7Monitoring of (a) passive layer resistance RF, (b) effective capacitance Ceff and (c) CPE exponent n calculated on the base of RS (QRF) EEC for each investigated alloy. The one-week exposure was carried out in 0.9% NaCl solution at 37 °C.
Figure 8Cyclic polarization curves recorded for the studied alloys in 0.9% NaCl solutions at a scan rate of 1.0 mV s−1 at 37 °C.
Figure 9Chronoamperometry (current–time) curves recorded for the studied solder alloys in 0.9% NaCl solution at applied anodic potentials of 2.0 V (a) and 4.0 V (b) vs. SCE at 37 °C: (1) pure Ti; (2) Ti-6Al-7Nb; (3) Ti-6Al-4V; and (4) TC21.
Figure 10SEM micrographs taken in secondary electron mode for each investigated sample: (a) pure Ti as a reference; (b) TC21 alloy; (c) Ti-6Al-4V; and (d) Ti-6Al-7Nb at the end of one-week exposure in 0.9% NaCl at 37 °C. Magnification: × 500. In the inset, back-scatter electron topography mode images of selected surface defects. Magnification: × 2000.
Figure 11High-resolution XPS spectra recorded in (a) Ti2p, (b) Cl2p and (c) O1s energy range for each investigated alloy after seven days of exposure to 0.9% NaCl solution at 37 °C.
XPS deconvolution results carried out in Ti2p, Cl2p and O1s energy range after seven days of exposure to 0.9% NaCl solution at 37 °C (in at.%).
| Ti2p | Other Additives | O1s | Cl2p | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TiO2 | Me-O | OH/CO | C=O/H2O | Me-Cl | ||
| BE/eV | 458.6 | * | 530.2 | 531.6 | 532.8 | 198.9 |
| Ti | 21.3 | -- | 37.5 | 26.2 | 13.1 | 1.9 |
| Ti-6Al-4V | 17.4 | 4.3 | 28.8 | 25.7 | 20.8 | 3.0 |
| Ti-6Al-7Nb | 17.1 | 4.4 | 31.1 | 27.0 | 18.2 | 2.2 |
| TC21 | 17.2 | 5.8 | 31.2 | 25.1 | 16.1 | 4.6 |