Literature DB >> 30990098

Accuracy of PurePulse photoplethysmography technology of Fitbit Charge 2 for assessment of heart rate during sleep.

Shahab Haghayegh1, Sepideh Khoshnevis1, Michael H Smolensky1,2, Kenneth R Diller1.   

Abstract

Elevated asleep heart rate (HR) is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and other-cause morbidity and mortality. We assessed the accuracy of Fitbit Inc. PurePulse® photoplethysmography with reference to three-lead electrocardiography (ECG) in determining HR during sleep. HR of 35 (17 female) healthy adults 25.1 ± 10.6 years of age (mean ± SD) was continuously recorded throughout a single night of sleep. There was no significant difference in asleep HR mean (0.09 beats per minute [bpm], P = 0.426) between Fitbit photoplethysmography and ECG; plus, there was excellent intraclass correlation (0.998) and narrow Bland-Altman agreement range (2.67 bpm). The regression analysis of Bland-Altman plot of mean asleep HR indicates Fitbit tends to slightly overestimate reference values in the lower range of HR (HR < 50 bpm) by 0.51 bpm and slightly underestimate reference values in the higher range of HR (HR > 80 bpm) by 0.63 bpm. Mixed model analysis of epoch-by-epoch (5-min epochs) asleep HR showed significant "U" shape trend (P < 0.001) in amount of Fitbit error (absolute amount of difference between ECG and Fitbit values regardless of overestimation or underestimation) in regard to HR, i.e. smaller error in the medium range of HR (60-80 bpm) and slightly larger error for lower (<60 bpm) and higher (>80 bpm) ranges of HR. However, effect of age, body mass index, gender, and subjective sleep quality measured by Pittsburgh sleep quality index (good/poor sleepers) on error in estimating HR by the Fitbit method was not significant. It is concluded that Fitbit photoplethysmography suitably tracks HR during sleep in healthy young adults.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fitbit; Heart rate; electrocardiography; measurement; performance comparison; photoplethysmography; sleep; validation; wearable activity monitors

Year:  2019        PMID: 30990098     DOI: 10.1080/07420528.2019.1596947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronobiol Int        ISSN: 0742-0528            Impact factor:   2.877


  14 in total

Review 1.  Sensors Capabilities, Performance, and Use of Consumer Sleep Technology.

Authors:  Massimiliano de Zambotti; Nicola Cellini; Luca Menghini; Michela Sarlo; Fiona C Baker
Journal:  Sleep Med Clin       Date:  2020-01-03

2.  Harnessing wearable device data to improve state-level real-time surveillance of influenza-like illness in the USA: a population-based study.

Authors:  Jennifer M Radin; Nathan E Wineinger; Eric J Topol; Steven R Steinhubl
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2020-01-16

3.  Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Syndrome Screening Through Wrist-Worn Smartbands: A Machine-Learning Approach.

Authors:  Davide Benedetti; Umberto Olcese; Simone Bruno; Marta Barsotti; Michelangelo Maestri Tassoni; Enrica Bonanni; Gabriele Siciliano; Ugo Faraguna
Journal:  Nat Sci Sleep       Date:  2022-05-18

4.  Evaluation of Sleep Parameters and Sleep Staging (Slow Wave Sleep) in Athletes by Fitbit Alta HR, a Consumer Sleep Tracking Device.

Authors:  Yu Kawasaki; Takatoshi Kasai; Yuko Sakurama; Akiko Sekiguchi; Eri Kitamura; Itsuki Midorikawa; Nanako Shiroshita; Fusae Kawana; Etsuko Ogasawara; Mari Kitade; Natsue Koikawa; Takao Matsuda
Journal:  Nat Sci Sleep       Date:  2022-04-26

5.  Embedding Mobile Health Technology into the Nurses' Health Study 3 to Study Behavioral Risk Factors for Cancer.

Authors:  Ruby Fore; Jaime E Hart; Christine Choirat; Jennifer W Thompson; Kathleen Lynch; Francine Laden; Jorge E Chavarro; Peter James
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Performance of Fitbit Charge 3 against polysomnography in measuring sleep in adolescent boys and girls.

Authors:  Luca Menghini; Dilara Yuksel; Aimee Goldstone; Fiona C Baker; Massimiliano de Zambotti
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.749

7.  Heart rate detection by Fitbit ChargeHR : A validation study versus portable polysomnography.

Authors:  Davide Benedetti; Umberto Olcese; Paolo Frumento; Andrea Bazzani; Simone Bruno; Paola d'Ascanio; Michelangelo Maestri; Enrica Bonanni; Ugo Faraguna
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 5.296

8.  Validity of simplified, calibration-less exercise intensity measurement using resting heart rate during sleep: a method-comparison study with respiratory gas analysis.

Authors:  Hirotaka Matsuura; Masahiko Mukaino; Yohei Otaka; Hitoshi Kagaya; Yasushi Aoshima; Takuya Suzuki; Ayaka Inukai; Emi Hattori; Takayuki Ogasawara; Eiichi Saitoh
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-11-04

9.  Accuracy of Wristband Fitbit Models in Assessing Sleep: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shahab Haghayegh; Sepideh Khoshnevis; Michael H Smolensky; Kenneth R Diller; Richard J Castriotta
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Wrist-Based Photoplethysmography Assessment of Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability: Validation of WHOOP.

Authors:  Clint R Bellenger; Dean J Miller; Shona L Halson; Gregory D Roach; Charli Sargent
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.