Valentina Pasquale1, Erica Dugnani1, Daniela Liberati2, Paolo Marra3, Antonio Citro1, Tamara Canu3, Martina Policardi1, Libera Valla1, Antonio Esposito3,4, Lorenzo Piemonti5,6. 1. Diabetes Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy. 2. Division of Genetics and Cell biology, Genomic Unit for the diagnosis of human pathologies, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132, Milan, Italy. 3. Department of Radiology, Experimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132, Milan, Italy. 4. Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. 5. Diabetes Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy. piemonti.lorenzo@hsr.it. 6. Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. piemonti.lorenzo@hsr.it.
Abstract
AIM: More than 40% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients have glucose intolerance or diabetes. The association has led to two hypotheses: PDAC causes diabetes or diabetes shares risk factors for the development of PDAC. In order to elucidate the relationship between diabetes and PDAC, we investigated the glucose metabolism during tumorigenesis in the LSL-KrasG12D/+; LSL-Trp53R172H/+; and Pdx-1-Cre (KPC) mouse, a genetically engineered model of PDAC. METHODS: Male and female KPCs have been fed with standard diet (SD) or high-fat diet (HFD). The imaging-based 4-class tumor staging was used to follow pancreatic cancer development. Not fasting glycemia, 4-h fasting glycemia, insulin, C-peptide, glucose tolerance after OGTT and abdominal fat volume were measured during tumorigenesis. RESULTS: PDAC development did not lead to an overt diabetic phenotype or to any alterations in glucose tolerance in KPC fed with SD. Consumption of HFD induced higher body weight/abdominal fat volume and worsened glucose homeostasis both in control CRE mice and only in early tumorigenesis stages of the KPC mice, excluding that the cancer development itself acts as a trigger for the onset of dysmetabolic features. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that carcinogenesis in KPC mice is not associated with paraneoplastic diabetes.
AIM: More than 40% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients have glucose intolerance or diabetes. The association has led to two hypotheses: PDAC causes diabetes or diabetes shares risk factors for the development of PDAC. In order to elucidate the relationship between diabetes and PDAC, we investigated the glucose metabolism during tumorigenesis in the LSL-KrasG12D/+; LSL-Trp53R172H/+; and Pdx-1-Cre (KPC) mouse, a genetically engineered model of PDAC. METHODS: Male and female KPCs have been fed with standard diet (SD) or high-fat diet (HFD). The imaging-based 4-class tumor staging was used to follow pancreatic cancer development. Not fasting glycemia, 4-h fasting glycemia, insulin, C-peptide, glucose tolerance after OGTT and abdominal fat volume were measured during tumorigenesis. RESULTS:PDAC development did not lead to an overt diabetic phenotype or to any alterations in glucose tolerance in KPC fed with SD. Consumption of HFD induced higher body weight/abdominal fat volume and worsened glucose homeostasis both in control CRE mice and only in early tumorigenesis stages of the KPC mice, excluding that the cancer development itself acts as a trigger for the onset of dysmetabolic features. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that carcinogenesis in KPC mice is not associated with paraneoplastic diabetes.