Literature DB >> 30989273

Highly variable coronal tibial and femoral alignment in osteoarthritic knees: a systematic review.

Silvan Hess1,2, Lukas B Moser3,4, Felix Amsler5, Henrik Behrend6, Michael T Hirschmann3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is a lack of knowledge about coronal alignment variability in osteoarthritic knees. Therefore, the purpose of this article was to systematically review the literature and collect data about the lower limb alignment including hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), femoral mechanical angle (FMA), tibial mechanical angle (TMA) and the joint line convergence angle (JLCA) in osteoarthritic knees.
METHODS: A systematic review was performed using the electronic databases MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and Google Scholar. The following keywords were used: (morphology OR geometr* OR anatomy OR alignment OR phenotypes), (coronal OR neutral OR varus OR valgus), (knee OR lower limb OR femur OR tibia) and (osteoarthritis OR arthritis). Out of 110 full-text articles retrieved, 15 studies were included. Demographic information included author's names, year of publication, imaging modality, sample size and patient demographics (i.e. sex, age, etc.). Descriptive statistics, such as means, ranges, and measures of variance [e.g. standard deviations, 95% confidence intervals (CI)] for all angles (HKA, FMA, TMA, JLCA) are presented.
RESULTS: Thirteen studies reported mean overall HKA angles ranging from 163.5° ± 2.3° to 179.9° ± 4.8°. The mean HKA angles in females were between 164.1° ± 7.2° and 178.8° ± 4.8°, and in males between 163.4° ± 5.5° and 177.4° ± 3.9°. The lowest and highest reported HKA angles were - 27.7° and + 22.0°, respectively. Seven studies reported mean FMA angles. Mean values ranged from 92.7° ± 2.7° valgus to 88.6° ± 2° varus. The reported mean FMAs for male were 87.9° ± 0.5° to 90.7° ± 3° and for female 89.91° ± 2.8° to 92.9° ± 3.1°. Six studies reported mean TMA values. TMA ranged from 81.7° ± 3.9° varus to 87.7° ± 4.1° varus. Only three studies reported mean JLCA angles, which ranged from - 4.3° to - 6.4° ± 3.8°.
CONCLUSION: Osteoarthritic knees showed a huge variation in overall coronal limb alignment as well as in femoral and tibial coronal alignment. Current total knee arthroplasty (TKA) alignment philosophies and preoperative planning do not sufficiently consider these variation, which might be one reason for unhappy knees after TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, systematic review.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alignment; Anatomy; Femoral mechanical angle; Hip–knee–ankle angle; Knee; OA; TKA; Tibial mechanical angle

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30989273     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05506-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  24 in total

1.  Alignment in TKA: what has been clear is not anymore!

Authors:  Michael T Hirschmann; Roland Becker; Reha Tandogan; Pascal-André Vendittoli; Stephen Howell
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Bone resection for mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty creates frequent gap modifications and imbalances.

Authors:  William Blakeney; Yann Beaulieu; Benjamin Puliero; Marc-Olivier Kiss; Pascal-André Vendittoli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Kinematically aligned TKA restores physiological patellofemoral biomechanics in the sagittal plane during a deep knee bend.

Authors:  Stephanie Nicolet-Petersen; Augustine Saiz; Trevor Shelton; Stephen Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Tibial joint line orientation has no effect on joint awareness after mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anna-Katharina Calek; Andreas Ladurner; Lukas Jud; Vilijam Zdravkovic; Henrik Behrend
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 4.114

5.  Joint line is restored in robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty performed with a tibia-based functional alignment.

Authors:  Francesco Zambianchi; Gabriele Bazzan; Andrea Marcovigi; Marco Pavesi; Andrea Illuminati; Andrea Ensini; Fabio Catani
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  There are isoheight points that measure constant femoral condyle heights along the knee flexion path.

Authors:  Zhitao Rao; Chaochao Zhou; Qidong Zhang; Willem A Kernkamp; Jianping Wang; Liming Cheng; Timothy E Foster; Hany S Bedair; Guoan Li
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Kinematic alignment of medial UKA is safe: a systematic review.

Authors:  Charles Rivière; Sivan Sivaloganathan; Loic Villet; Philippe Cartier; Sébastien Lustig; Pascal-André Vendittoli; Justin Cobb
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Smartphone Inclinometry Is a Valid and Reliable Tool for Measuring Frontal Plane Tibial Alignment in Healthy and Osteoarthritic Knees.

Authors:  Calvin T F Tse; Jesse M Charlton; Jennifer Lam; Joanne Ho; Jessica Bears; Amanda Serek; Michael A Hunt
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2021-07-01

Review 9.  Sexual dimorphism and racial diversity render bone-implant mismatch inevitable after off-the-shelf total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lucas Beckers; Jacobus H Müller; Jeremy Daxhelet; Mo Saffarini; Tarik Aït-Si-Selmi; Michel P Bonnin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Small medial femoral condyle morphotype is associated with medial compartment degeneration and distinct morphological characteristics: a comparative pilot study.

Authors:  Jonas Grammens; Annemieke Van Haver; Femke Danckaers; Brian Booth; Jan Sijbers; Peter Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.