| Literature DB >> 30989137 |
Agnieszka Tylkowska1, Bogumiła Pilarczyk1, Renata Pilarczyk2, Michał Zyśko3, Agnieszka Tomza-Marciniak1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Foxes are a reservoir of parasites that are dangerous to humans. The aim of the study was to determine the parameters associated with the occurrence of tapeworms in red foxes in north-western Poland.Entities:
Keywords: Dipylidium caninum; Echinococcus multilocularis; Mesocestoides lineatus; Poland; Taenia spp; red fox
Year: 2019 PMID: 30989137 PMCID: PMC6458553 DOI: 10.2478/jvetres-2019-0005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Res ISSN: 2450-7393 Impact factor: 1.744
Occurrence of tapeworms in red foxes
| Number of | Intensity of infection | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parasite | Number of parasites | infected foxes/tested foxes | Prevalence (%) | Mean | Range | Relative density | Janion’s Z indicator |
| Tapeworms (in total) | 23,295 | 378/620 | 61.0 | 61.4 | 1–965 | 37.5 | 22.9 |
| 4,241 | 18/620 | 2.9 | 235.6 | 17–959 | 6.8 | 0.2 | |
| 18,356 | 256/620 | 41.3 | 71.4 | 1–650 | 29.5 | 12.2 | |
| 624 | 176/620 | 28.4 | 3.6 | 1–13 | 1.0 | 0.3 | |
| 74 | 22/620 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 1–8 | 0.1 | 0.004 | |
Occurrence of tapeworms in red foxes according to sex of host
| Parasite | Sex host of | Number | Number of | Prevalence | χ2 test | Intensity of infection | Relative | Janion’s Z | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| of parasites | infected foxes /tested foxes | (%) | score | Mean | Range | Mann–Whitney test score | density | indicator | ||
| Tapeworms (in total) | ♂ | 14,783 | 234/384 | 60.9 | χ2 = 0.00 | 63.2 | 1–877 | Z = −-0.36 | 38.5 | 23.5 |
| ♀ | 8,443 | 144/236 | 61.0 | P = 0.984 | 58.6 | 1–965 | P = 0.718 | 35.8 | 21.8 | |
| ♂ | 3,168 | 15/384 | 3.9 | χ2 = 3.60 | 211.2 | 17–721 | Z = −1.90 | 8.3 | 0.3 | |
| ♀ | 1,073 | 3/236 | 1.3 | P = 0.058 | 357.7 | 28–959 | P = 0.058 | 4.5 | 0.06 | |
| ♂ | 1,1,216 | 165/384 | 43.0 | χ2 = 1.17 | 68.0 | 1–650 | Z = 2.23a | 29.2 | 12.6 | |
| ♀ | 7,071 | 91/236 | 38.6 | P = 0.279 | 77.7 | 1–396 | P = 0.03 | 30.0 | 11.6 | |
| ♂ | 366 | 104/384 | 27.1 | χ2 = 0.84 | 3.5 | 1–13 | Z = −-1.02 | 1.0 | 0.3 | |
| ♀ | 258 | 72/236 | 30.5 | P = 0.358 | 3.6 | 1–11 | P = 0.308 | 1.1 | 0.3 | |
| ♂ | 33 | 12/384 | 3.1 | χ2 = 0.50 | 2.8 | 1–8 | Z = −0.76 | 0.09 | 0.003 | |
| ♀ | 41 | 10/236 | 4.2 | P = 0.479 | 4.1 | 1–8 | P = 0.448 | 0.2 | 0.007 | |
a – P ≤ 0.05
Occurrence of tapeworms in red foxes according to their location in the small intestine
| Number of | Intensity of infection | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parasite | Part of the small intestine | Number of parasites | infected foxes /tested foxes | Prevalence (%) | Cochran test score | Mean | Range | Kruskal–Wallis test score | Relative density | Janion’s Z indicator |
| Duodenum | 931 | 288/620 | 46.4 | 2.9A | 1–97 | 1.5 | 0.7 | |||
| Tapeworms | Q = 195.2 | H = 147.5 | ||||||||
| (in total) | Jejunum | 17,624 | 338/620 | 54.5 | P < 0.001 | 44.1B | 1–676 | P < 0.001 | 28.4 | 15.5 |
| Ileum | 4,740 | 160/620 | 25.8 | 28.6A | 1–535 | 7.7 | 2.0 | |||
| Duodenum | 0 | 0/620 | - | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Q = 36.0 | H = 0.530 | |||||||||
| Jejunum Ileum | 1,784 2,457 | 18/620 18/620 | 2.9 2.9 | P < 0.0 01 | 99.1 136.5 | 2–425 2–534 | P = 0.467 | 2.9 4.0 | 0.08 0.1 | |
| Duodenum | 685 | 141/620 | 22.7 | 4.9A | 1–96 | 1.1 | 0.3 | |||
| Q = 129.6 | H = 183.2 | |||||||||
| spp. | Jejunum | 15,418 | 244/620 | 39.4 | P < 0.001 | 63.2B | 1–579 | P < 0.001 | 24.9 | 9.8 |
| Ileum | 2,253 | 129/620 | 20.8 | 17.5A | 1–196 | 3.6 | 0.8 | |||
| Duodenum | 234 | 164/620 | 26.5 | 1.4A | 1–5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | |||
| Q = 205.6 | H = 71.4 | |||||||||
| Jejunum | 363 | 119/620 | 19.2 | P < 0.001 | 3.1B | 1–10 | P < 0.001 | 0.6 | 0.1 | |
| Ileum | 27 | 16/620 | 2.6 | 1.7A | 1–3 | 0.04 | 0.001 | |||
| Duodenum | 12 | 12/620 | 1.9 | 1.0A | 1 | 0.02 | 0.0004 | |||
| Q = 19.4 | H = 16.7 | |||||||||
| Jejunum | 59 | 19/620 | 3.1 | P < 0.001 | 3.1B | 1–8 | P < 0.001 | 0.1 | 0.003 | |
| Ileum | 3 | 3/620 | 0.5 | 1.0A | 1 | 0.005 | 0.00002 | |||
Different capital letters indicate statistically significant differences at P ≤ 0.01
Fig. 1Extensity of tapeworms and Echinococcus multilocularis infection (%) of red foxes in particular districts of West Pomerania Province; figures marked in red indicate the greatest extensity
The frequency of co-occurrence of particular types of tapeworm in a single host organism
| Parasite | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.4 | 2.5 | Not identified | ||
| 9 (1.5) | 15.6 | 0.7 | ||
| 5 (0.8) | 80 (12.9) | 1.0 | ||
| Not identified | 2 (0.3) | 2 (0.3) |
Bold text – the number of foxes in which a tapeworm species was found; dark grey field – the number of co-occurring tapeworm species (prevalence); light grey field – the Jaccard coexistence index between the species of tapeworms (%)