Literature DB >> 30988655

COMPARISON OF RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION AND CURETTAGE IN OSTEOID OSTEOMA IN CHILDREN.

Ferdi Göksel1, Ayşe Aycan2, Cenk Ermutlu3, Umut Hatay Gölge1, Bartu Sarısözen2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Osteoid osteoma, which is observed in the adolescent and young adult population as benign bone tumors, appears as a single nidus with a diameter < 2 cm and is treated with open surgery. However, technological advances in medicine have made it possible to apply less invasive procedures in surgery.
METHODS: Between 2006-2014, 24 patients < 18 years of age were treated for osteoid osteoma. Patient demographic data, surgical data, complications, and recurrences were noted.
RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (mean age, 11 [2-18] years) were treated and followed up for a mean 3.58 (range, 1-9) years. Mean patient age in the curettage group was 12.1 (range, 3-18) years. Mean operation length was 69.5 (range, 60-120) minutes. Mean hospital stay was 1.3 (range, 0-2) days. Mean patient age in the radiofrequency ablation (RFA) group was 10.7 (range, 2-17) years. Five patients were female and 8 were male. Mean operation length was 49.6 (range, 20-90) minutes. Mean hospital stay was 0.3 (range, 0-1) days. Mean follow-up time was 1.76 (range, 1-4) years. Mean operation length, hospital stay, and follow-up were significantly shorter in the RFA group.
CONCLUSIONS: Considering reduced costs due to shorter hospitalization periods and the ability to reach anatomically difficult locations, percutaneous procedures are likely to replace the conventional open approach. Level of evidence: II, retrospective study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Hospital stay; Osteoid osteoma

Year:  2019        PMID: 30988655      PMCID: PMC6442716          DOI: 10.1590/1413-785220192702158113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras        ISSN: 1413-7852            Impact factor:   0.513


INTRODUCTION

Osteoid osteoma is the third most common bone tumour. It is generally observed in the long bones of the lower extremities, especially in the adolescent and young adult population. Histologically, it is described by a single nidus formed by osteoblasts and endowed with neural and vascular supply. The lesion is typically smaller than 2 centimeters. The most common symptom is pain, which is discontinuous in the beginning but gradually getting constant. Symptoms increase at night and generally alleviated by oral non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs(NSAİD) medication. Plain radiographs and computer tomography(CT) scan are usually enough for diagnosis. – Bone scintigraphy, single photon emission CT or magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) may be indicated in some cases. – Osteoid osteomas tend to regress within 6 to 15 years without treatment. This can be reduced to 2 to 3 years with the use of acetylsalicylic acid and NSAİDs. However, most patients do not comply with long term medication because of gastrointestinal side effects or frustration. – For years, the alternative to medical treatment had been surgical resection or curettage. Recently, percutaneous interventions such as radiofrequency ablation(RFA),trephine excision, cryoablation and laser thermocoagulation have been introduced. – The aim of this study is to compare the results of conventional surgical treatment with those of RFA in children and adolescents. The participants of the research are signed the Term of Free and Informed Consents. Our article hasn't got ethics committee approval.because it isn't compulsory in retrospective studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty four patients under 18 years of age who were treated because of osteoid osteoma between years 2006 and 2014 in our institution were included in this retrospective study. Patients with less than 1 year of follow-up, those who had first presented with recurrence and those with vertebral lesions were excluded. Patient's age, gender, location of the tumour, type of intervention, date, duration, pathological results, hospitalization time, complications and recurrence if any were noted. Patients were grouped into two based on type of treatment; those who had curettage and those who were treated with RFA. Operation length, hospitalisation length, complication and, recurrence and success rates were compared between two groups.

Operative procedure

Patients were placed supine on the radiolucent operating table. Both procedures were performed under general anesthesia with fluoroscopic guidance. Patients were discharged once their postoperative pain was manageable with oral analgesic only. Patients were allowed to mobilize freely. Following standard soft tissue dissection, site of the bony lesion was exposed. Exact location of the lesion was confirmed with fluoroscopy. Thin layers of bone were removed tangentially using gauges till nidus was visualized. Nidus and the surrounding reactive tissue were curetted and sent for pathological examination.(Figure 1)
Figure 1

RFA treated 1 years old female patient preoperative (a-b), intraoperative (c), postoperative (d) 1. Year images.

For the RFA method, exact location of the lesion was determined prior to a stab incision. The bone was drilled using a 3-4 mm drill bit. RF probe (Cool-tip RF Ablation System, Covidien,USA)was placed inside the bone tunnel created and it was made sure that the probe was inside the lesion. Ablation was performed at 90 C for 6 minutes.(Figure 2)
Figure 2

Curettage treated 13 years old male patient preoperative (a-b) early postoperative (c-d) postoperative 15. month(e) images.

Descriptive statistics, chi-square and Mann-Whitney-U tests were used to compare variables. Data were analysed with SPSS statistical software (SPSS, Chicago, USA)

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 11(2-18) years. Eight (33%) of the patients were female and 16(66%) were male. 54.2% of the lesions were in the femur, 29.2% in the tibia and 16.7% in other locations (one in humerus, ulna, calcaneus and fibula each). Mean duration of symptoms till surgery was 7.66(1-24) months. Eleven (45.83%) patients underwent curettage, while 13(54.17%) patients received RFA Mean age of patients in curettage group was 12.1(3-18) years. Three of them were female and 8 were male. Mean operation length was 69.5 (60-120) minutes. Mean hospital stay was 1.3(0-2) days. Mean follow-up time was 5.72(2-9) years. Mean age of patients in the RFA group was 10,7(2-17) years. Five of them were female and 8 were male. Mean operation length was 49.6(20-90)minutes. Mean hospital stay was 0.3(0-1) days. Mean follow-up time was 1.76(1-4) years. Mean operation length, hospital stay and follow-up was significantly shorter in the RFA group. All data of the patients are outlined on Table 1.
Table 1

All data of the patients.

Demographic propertiescurettageRftotal
Patient111324
Age(mean)(yr)12,1(3-18)10,7(2-17)11(2-18)
Sex(F-M)3-85-88-16
Duration of symptoms (mean)(month)9,54(5-24)6,07(1-14)7,66(1-24)
Operation time(mean)(min)69,5(60-120)49,6(20-90)58,7(20-120)
Lengt of hospital(mean)(day)1,3(0-2)0,3(0-1)0,75(0-2)
Follow up time(mean) (yr)5,72(2-9)1,76(1-4)3,58(1-9)
Recurrence224
Localisation
Femur7613
Tibia167
Other314
Two patients (18.1%) in the curettage group had recurrence. One of the cases was a 3 years old male child with a lesion in his right proximal femur. He had persistent pain in month 5 after surgery and curettage was repeated once further studies confirmed. Other case was a 13 years old female patient with a lesion in her right proximal femur. She was still symptomatic 1 month after surgery and imaging studies revealed recurring lesion. She was treated with RFA ablation. Both patients remained symptom-free and were considered as cured based on their patient records. Two of 13 patients (15.3%) in the RFA group had recurrence. One of the cases was a 12 years old female child with a lesion in her left tibial diaphysis that recurred 6 months after surgery. Other case was a 12 years old male patient with a lesion in his left femoral diaphysis which recurred 18 months after surgery. Both patients received 2nd time RFA and no more intervention was necessary. She was still symptomatic 1 month after surgery and imaging studies revealed recurring lesion. She was treated with RFA. Both patients remained symptom-free and were considered as cured based on their patient records. An eighteen years old patient with a lesion in his calcaneus who was treated with curettage developed wound site injection and needed soft tissue debridement.

DISCUSSION

Technological advances in medicine have made less invasive procedures applicable in the field of surgery. CT, fluoroscopy or MRI guided percutaneous interventions have become alternatives to open surgery in the treatment of osteoid osteoma. Review of recent literature reveals that percutaneous techniques are now more common than open surgery. – We have been using mainly radiofrequency in our clinic for the last four years. Operative length in open surgery is typically longer as it takes time for exposure and wound closure. Need for increased soft tissue dissection and osseous manipulation in open surgery causes more postoperative pain and lengthens hospital stay. , , Lindner has compared percutaneous drilling to conventional methods and stated that hospital stay was shorter with the percutaneous approach.9 Similarly, Rosenthal has compared radiofrequency to open methods and reported hospital stay lengths of 4,7 and 0.18 days for open approach and RFA consecutively.7 Yildiz have stated that mean hospital stay was 5 days while percutaneous interventions were performed as outpatient procedures. Main aim of osteoid osteoma treatment is complete excision of the nidus and weaning of symptoms. Complete excision may not always be possible because of lesion's small size and surrounding sclerotic bone, resulting in recurrence. Recurrence is still a major problem despite intraoperative use of advanced imaging techniques. Literature reports 5-25% recurrence with different treatment modalities. , , In our study, recurrence rates were 18,1% for curettage and 15,3 % for RFA. Rosenthal has reported recurrence in 9% of cases with open procedures, where as this rate was 12% with RFA. In his study on conventional treatment of osteoid osteoma, Yildiz had recurrence rate of 5%. Bourgault has conducted a study on CT guided RFA of osteoid osteoma and reported 10.4% recurrence. Recurrences tend to occur during the first 2 years following surgery. , , Since we have switched mainly to RFA for treatment of osteoid osteoma, follow-up lengths have been shortened. Current literature reports a similar trend with use of less invasive methods, which is disadvantageous to detect recurrence since it can happen during a two year period. Long-term follow ups of RFA need to be analyzed to claim a success, since recurrence can occur in a two year period Interventions to osteoid osteoma lesions are performed by both orthopedists and radiologists. While radiologists performed procedures under CT and MRI guidance, orthopedists preferred C-arm fluoroscopy and CT. , , , , Recurrence rates are similar among different procedures and type of instruments. CT scan is useful because tumor size is small. Disadvantages of CT scan are problems with radiologic suite sterility, radiation, accuracy and increased intra and postoperative complications. – The main advantage of open procedure is the possibility of histopathological diagnosis. This is not possible with percutaneous interventions. however, several authors conclude that clinical and radiological examination are adequate for diagnosis and pathological essay is not mandatory. , This will reduce patient costs also. Nevertheless, histopathological examination is still recommended for lesion on atypical sites. , Most of the studies in the literature are case series of a single type of treatment method. Comparative studies such as ours are extremely rare. In this study, recurrence rates of two different modalities were found to be similar. Operation and hospitalization length were shorter with RFA. When reduced costs due to shorter hospitalization and the ability to reach anatomically difficult locations are also considered percutaneous procedures are likely to replace conventional open approach.
  20 in total

1.  [The treatment of osteoid osteoma: a multitude of choice: surgery, percutaneous resection, alcohol injection or thermocoagulation].

Authors:  A Gangi
Journal:  J Radiol       Date:  1999-05

2.  Percutaneous radiofrequency coagulation of osteoid osteoma compared with operative treatment.

Authors:  M A Simon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in osteoid osteoma.

Authors:  N J Lindner; T Ozaki; R Roedl; G Gosheger; W Winkelmann; K Wörtler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-04

4.  Navigated Iso-C3D-based percutaneous osteoid osteoma resection: a preliminary clinical report.

Authors:  Daniel Kendoff; Tobias Hüfner; Musa Citak; Jens Geerling; Eckhard Mössinger; Leonhard Bastian; Christian Krettek
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2005-05

5.  Osteoid osteoma: the results of surgical treatment.

Authors:  Y Yildiz; K Bayrakci; M Altay; Y Saglik
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Decreasing length of hospital stay in treatment of osteoid osteoma.

Authors:  D I Rosenthal; F J Hornicek; M W Wolfe; L C Jennings; M C Gebhardt; H J Mankin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Osteoid osteoma. Direct visual identification and intralesional excision of the nidus with minimal removal of bone.

Authors:  M Campanacci; P Ruggieri; A Gasbarrini; A Ferraro; L Campanacci
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-09

8.  Role of intraoperative 3D C-arm-based navigation in percutaneous excision of osteoid osteoma of long bones in children.

Authors:  Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran; Karuppaiah Karthik; Vattipalli Ravi Chandra; Natesan Rajkumar; Jayaramaraju Dheenadhayalan
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Osteoid osteoma: percutaneous treatment with radiofrequency energy.

Authors:  Daniel I Rosenthal; Francis J Hornicek; Martin Torriani; Mark C Gebhardt; Henry J Mankin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  The management of osteoid osteoma: updates and controversies.

Authors:  Ismat Ghanem
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.856

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Osteoid osteoma: which is the best mininvasive treatment option?

Authors:  Anna Parmeggiani; Claudia Martella; Luca Ceccarelli; Marco Miceli; Paolo Spinnato; Giancarlo Facchini
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-04-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.