| Literature DB >> 30988651 |
Hakan Sarman1, Cengiz Isik2, Mustafa Uslu3, Mustafa Erkan Inanmaz4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To postoperatively evaluate knee scores, radiological assessment results, deficit correction, patellar height change, bone healing time, and weight bearing time in patients undergoing high tibial osteotomy (HTO) with/without autologous iliac bone grafting.Entities:
Keywords: Autograft; Bone plate; Correction; Healing; Osteotomy; Tibia
Year: 2019 PMID: 30988651 PMCID: PMC6442715 DOI: 10.1590/1413-785220192702164465
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Ortop Bras ISSN: 1413-7852 Impact factor: 0.513
Figure 1A) Open Wedge Osteotomy titanium locking plate AP. B) Open Wedge Osteotomy titanium locking plate LAT.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
|---|---|
| Patients aged <65 | Patients aged >65 |
| Isolated medial compartment arthrosis (Ahlbäck grade 1 or 2) | Ahlbäck grade 3 arthrosis and excessive patellofemoral arthrosis |
| Good patient motivation to comply with postoperative rehabilitation | Poorly patient mentally to comply with postoperative rehabilitation |
| Range of motion >100° | Range of motion <100° |
| Absence of knee contractures | Flexion contracture of >10° |
| Moderate to severe varus malalignment (5-15°) | Varus gonarthrosis requiring >20° correction |
| Medial joint pain treat to conservative management (analgesics and/or painkillers and physiotherapy for at least 1 year) | Incompatible patient to conservative treatment and poor bone quality (pre-diagnosed osteoporosis) |
| Stable knees | Laxity of collateral ligament, Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) insufficiency |
| BMI< 30 kg/m2 | Previous ACL and/or PCL reconstruction |
| Previous bony realignment procedures to the extensor mechanism | |
| Joint infection and rheumatoid arthritis |
Figure 2A) Placement of Guide K wires. B) Determination of the size of the Puddu plate to be placed on the osteotomy incision line. C) AP radiogram following perioperative implantation of a plate. D) LAT radiogram following perioperative implantation of a plate.
Open Wedge Osteotomy plates size.
| Plate degrees | Number of knees with group a (n=31) | Number of knees with group b (n=32) | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 13 | 14 | 42,85 |
| 12.5 | 14 | 14 | 44,44 |
| 15 | 4 | 4 | 12,69 |
Knee Society Knee Score and Knee Society Functional Score with pre-operatively and post-operatively at one year after surgery.
| KSKS Pre-op. | KSKS Post-op. | KSFS Pre-op. | KSFS Post-op. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 37.9 (0-62) | 84.2 (38-100) | 45.9 (25-65) | 85.5 (40-100) |
| Group B | 38.1 (0-60) | 84.9 (40-100) | 44.5 (20-65) | 88.2 (60-100) |
KSKS: Knee Society Knee Score, KSFS: Knee Society Functional Score.
The evaluation of X-ray results.
| Group | A (N= 31) | B (N=32) | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preop MAD | 29.6 mm medial | 29.3 mm medial | 0,885 |
| Early Postop MAD | 5.06 mm lateral | 5.3 mm lateral | 0,388 |
| Postop 1 year MAD | 4.9 mm lateral | 5.1 mm lateral | 0,402 |
| PreopaMPTA | 81.3° (77°-86°) | 81.8° (76°-87°) | 0,459 |
| Early Postop aMPTA | 91.1° (87°-97°) | 91.4° (86°-97°) | 0,757 |
| Postop 1 Year aMPTA | 90.5° (86°-97°) | 91° (85°-97°) | 0,571 |
| Correction degrees of post-operation | 10.39° | 10.31° | 0,817 |
| Correction degrees of post-operation at 12 months | 9.97° | 9.94° | 0,918 |
| Difference of correction degrees | 0.42° | 0.39° | 0,910 |
| Preop ISI | 1,05 (0,79-1,22) | 1,01 (0,79-1,25) | 0,260 |
| Postop ISI | 1,12 (0,8-1,35) | 1,09 (0,81-1,35) | 0,534 |
| Postop ISI at 12. months | 1,14 (0,82-1,36) | 1,13 (0,84-1,36) | 0,854 |
| Preop BPR | 0,98 (0,77-1,12) | 0,94 (0,75-1,14) | 0,094 |
| Postop BPR | 0,94 (0,77-1,06) | 0,90 (0,75-1,05) | 0,099 |
| Postop BPR at 12. months | 0,92 (0,76-1) | 0,88 (0,75-1) | 0,100 |
MAD: Mechanical axis deviation, aMPTA: Angle between tibial anatomical axis and the articular surface of the proximal tibia and anteroposterior images, ISI: Insall-Salvatiindex, BPR:Blackburne-Peelratio.
Figure 3AP radiogram of the patient who developed lateral cortex fracture.
Figure 4AP radiogram of the patient with lateral plateau fracture.