Literature DB >> 30988079

Clinical Utility of Comprehensive Cell-free DNA Analysis to Identify Genomic Biomarkers in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Natasha B Leighl1, Ray D Page2, Victoria M Raymond3, Davey B Daniel4, Stephen G Divers5, Karen L Reckamp6, Miguel A Villalona-Calero7, Daniel Dix3, Justin I Odegaard3, Richard B Lanman3, Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Complete and timely tissue genotyping is challenging, leading to significant numbers of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) being undergenotyped for all eight genomic biomarkers recommended by professional guidelines. We aimed to demonstrate noninferiority of comprehensive cell-free DNA (cfDNA) relative to physician discretion standard-of-care (SOC) tissue genotyping to identify guideline-recommended biomarkers in patients with mNSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospectively enrolled patients with previously untreated mNSCLC undergoing physician discretion SOC tissue genotyping submitted a pretreatment blood sample for comprehensive cfDNA analysis (Guardant360).
RESULTS: Among 282 patients, physician discretion SOC tissue genotyping identified a guideline-recommended biomarker in 60 patients versus 77 cfDNA identified patients (21.3% vs. 27.3%; P < 0.0001 for noninferiority). In tissue-positive patients, the biomarker was identified alone (12/60) or concordant with cfDNA (48/60), an 80% cfDNA clinical sensitivity for any guideline-recommended biomarker. For FDA-approved targets (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF) concordance was >98.2% with 100% positive predictive value for cfDNA versus tissue (34/34 EGFR-, ALK-, or BRAF-positive patients). Utilizing cfDNA, in addition to tissue, increased detection by 48%, from 60 to 89 patients, including those with negative, not assessed, or insufficient tissue results. cfDNA median turnaround time was significantly faster than tissue (9 vs. 15 days; P < 0.0001). Guideline-complete genotyping was significantly more likely (268 vs. 51; P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: In the largest cfDNA study in previously untreated mNSCLC, a validated comprehensive cfDNA test identifies guideline-recommended biomarkers at a rate at least as high as SOC tissue genotyping, with high tissue concordance, more rapidly and completely than tissue-based genotyping.See related commentary by Meador and Oxnard, p. 4583. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30988079     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  116 in total

1.  Effective Cancer Genotyping-Many Means to One End.

Authors:  Catherine B Meador; Geoffrey R Oxnard
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Applications of liquid biopsy in the Pharmacological Audit Trail for anticancer drug development.

Authors:  Abhijit Pal; Rajiv Shinde; Manuel Selvi Miralles; Paul Workman; Johann de Bono
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Role of liquid biopsy in oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Matteo Canale; Luigi Pasini; Giuseppe Bronte; Angelo Delmonte; Paola Cravero; Lucio Crinò; Paola Ulivi
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-11

Review 4.  Strategies for the successful implementation of plasma-based NSCLC genotyping in clinical practice.

Authors:  Charu Aggarwal; Christian D Rolfo; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Jhanelle E Gray; Lynette M Sholl; David R Gandara
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  The current status of the clinical utility of liquid biopsies in cancer.

Authors:  Anson Snow; Denaly Chen; Julie E Lang
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2019-09-08       Impact factor: 5.225

6.  Baseline Plasma Tumor Mutation Burden Predicts Response to Pembrolizumab-based Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Charu Aggarwal; Jeffrey C Thompson; Austin L Chien; Katie J Quinn; Wei-Ting Hwang; Taylor A Black; Stephanie S Yee; Theresa E Christensen; Michael J LaRiviere; Benjamin A Silva; Kimberly C Banks; Rebecca J Nagy; Elena Helman; Abigail T Berman; Christine A Ciunci; Aditi P Singh; Jeffrey S Wasser; Joshua M Bauml; Corey J Langer; Roger B Cohen; Erica L Carpenter
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Comparison of liquid-based to tissue-based biopsy analysis by targeted next generation sequencing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive systematic review.

Authors:  Stepan M Esagian; Georgia Ι Grigoriadou; Ilias P Nikas; Vasileios Boikou; Peter M Sadow; Jae-Kyung Won; Konstantinos P Economopoulos
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  The rapidly evolving landscape of biomarker testing in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Paul A VanderLaan; Deepa Rangachari; Daniel B Costa
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Identification of Actionable Genomic Alterations Using Circulating Cell-Free DNA.

Authors:  Nora S Sánchez; Michael P Kahle; Ann Marie Bailey; Chetna Wathoo; Kavitha Balaji; Mehmet Esat Demirhan; Dong Yang; Milind Javle; Ahmed Kaseb; Cathy Eng; Vivek Subbiah; Filip Janku; Victoria M Raymond; Richard B Lanman; Kenna R Mills Shaw; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-09-24

10.  Multiple mutations at exon 2 of RHOA detected in plasma from patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Barbara Ottolini; Nadia Nawaz; Christopher S Trethewey; Sami Mamand; Rebecca L Allchin; Richard Dillon; Paul A Fields; Matthew J Ahearne; Simon D Wagner
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-06-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.