| Literature DB >> 30987113 |
Yu Chen1,2,3, Weipeng Lu4,5, Yanchuan Guo6,7,8, Yi Zhu9, Yeping Song10.
Abstract
Traditional wound dressings require frequent replacement, are prone to bacterial growth and cause a lot of environmental pollution. Therefore, biodegradable and antibacterial dressings are eagerly desired. In this paper, gelatin/ZnO fibers were first prepared by side-by-side electrospinning for potential wound dressing materials. The morphology, composition,Entities:
Keywords: ZnO particles; antibacterial activity; gelatin fibers
Year: 2019 PMID: 30987113 PMCID: PMC6523526 DOI: 10.3390/nano9040525
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the fabrication of gelatin/ZnO fibers by side-by-side electrospinning.
Figure 2Characterization of ZnO particles (a) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image, (b) particle size distribution by intensity, (c) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectrum and (d) X-ray diffractometry (XRD) spectrum.
Figure 3SEM images of (a) GZ0’, (b) GZ1’, (c) GZ2’, (d) GZ0, (e) GZ1 and (f) GZ2.
Figure 4The cross sections SEM images of (a) GZ1’, (b) GZ2’.
Figure 5Degradation process diagram of GZ2 in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) at 37 °C.
Figure 6(a) FTIR spectra of ZnO particles, GZ0, GZ1 and GZ2, (b) XRD patterns of ZnO particles, GZ0, GZ1 and GZ2, (c) energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis of GZ2, and (d) EDX mapping of GZ2.
Figure 7Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curve of ZnO, GZ0, GZ1 and GZ2.
Figure 8Real-time cell confluence study MRC-5 cells. The cell population was monitored for 168 h using an Incucyte™ Zoom system in an incubator (5% CO2 and 37 °C).
The relative growth rate (RGR) and cytotoxicity level of GZ0, GZ1 and GZ1.
| Day 1 | Day 3 | Day 5 | Day 7 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 105.8 | 95.7 | 85.2 | 82.1 |
|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
|
|
| 84.6 | 81.2 | 80.7 | 77.6 |
|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
|
|
| 92.4 | 84.1 | 75.8 | 75.3 |
|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
The standard of cytotoxicity determined from RGR.
| Cytotoxicity Level | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| >100 | 75–99 | 50–74 | 25–49 | 1–24 | 0 |
Figure 9Cell morphology of (a–e) Control, (f–j) GZ0, (k–o) GZ1 and (p–t) GZ2 at point of day 0, 1, 3, 5 and 7, respectively. Scale bar: 500 μm.
Figure 10The antibacterial activity of the gelatin/ZnO fibers against (a) Staphylococcus aureus and (b) Escherichia coli with and without UV light. (* represents p < 0.05, ** represents p < 0.01 and *** represents p < 0.001.).
Figure 11The photographs showing the antibacterial activity of (a,b) negative control, (c,d) ZnO particles, (e,f) GZ0, (g,h) GZ1 and (i,j) GZ2 against S. aureus and E. coli, respectively.