Literature DB >> 30985861

Assessment of Inpatient Time Allocation Among First-Year Internal Medicine Residents Using Time-Motion Observations.

Krisda H Chaiyachati1,2, Judy A Shea1,2, David A Asch1,2,3, Manqing Liu1,2, Lisa M Bellini1, C Jessica Dine1,2, Alice L Sternberg4, Yevgeniy Gitelman1, Alyssa M Yeager5, Jeremy M Asch6, Sanjay V Desai7.   

Abstract

Importance: The United States spends more than $12 billion annually on graduate medical education. Understanding how residents balance patient care and educational activities may provide insights into how the modern physician workforce is being trained. Objective: To describe how first-year internal medicine residents (interns) allocate time while working on general medicine inpatient services. Design, Setting, and Participants: Direct observational secondary analysis, including 6 US university-affiliated and community-based internal medicine programs in the mid-Atlantic region, of the Comparative Effectiveness of Models Optimizing Patient Safety and Resident Education (iCOMPARE) trial, a cluster-randomized trial comparing different duty-hour policies. A total of 194 weekday shifts were observed and time motion data were collected, sampled by daytime, nighttime, and call shifts in proportion to the distribution of shifts within each program from March 10 through May 31, 2016. Data were analyzed from June 1, 2016, through January 5, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mean time spent in direct and indirect patient care, education, rounds, handoffs, and miscellaneous activities within a 24-hour period and in each of four 6-hour periods (morning, afternoon, evening, and night). Time spent multitasking, simultaneously engaged in combinations of direct patient care, indirect patient care, or education, and in subcategories of indirect patient care were tracked.
Results: A total of 80 interns (55% men; mean [SD] age, 28.7 [2.3] years) were observed across 194 shifts, totaling 2173 hours. A mean (SD) of 15.9 (0.7) hours of a 24-hour period (66%) was spent in indirect patient care, mostly interactions with the patient's medical record or documentation (mean [SD], 10.3 [0.7] hours; 43%). A mean (SD) of 3.0 (0.1) hours was spent in direct patient care (13%) and 1.8 (0.3) hours in education (7%). This pattern was consistent across the 4 periods of the day. Direct patient care and education frequently occurred when interns were performing indirect patient care. Multitasking with 2 or more indirect patient care activities occurred for a mean (SD) of 3.8 (0.4) hours (16%) of the day. Conclusions and Relevance: This study's findings suggest that within these US teaching programs, interns spend more time participating in indirect patient care than interacting with patients or in dedicated educational activities. These findings provide an essential baseline measure for future efforts designed to improve the workday structure and experience of internal medicine trainees, without making a judgment on the current allocation of time. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02274818.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30985861     DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  30 in total

1.  Assessment of a Real-Time Locator System to Identify Physician and Nurse Work Locations.

Authors:  Ron C Li; Ben J Marafino; Derek Nielsen; Mike Baiocchi; Lisa Shieh
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-02-05

2.  Suffering Absence: Hauerwas and the Challenges to Faithful Presence in Contemporary Medical Training.

Authors:  Benjamin W Frush
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2020-07-21

3.  Characterizing styles of clinical note production and relationship to clinical work hours among first-year residents.

Authors:  Jen J Gong; Hossein Soleimani; Sara G Murray; Julia Adler-Milstein
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Nephrology Fellows' and Program Directors' Perceptions of Hospital Rounds in the United States.

Authors:  Suzanne M Boyle; Keshab Subedi; Kurtis A Pivert; Meera Nair Harhay; Jaime Baynes-Fields; Jesse Goldman; Karen M Warburton
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Decision analysis and reinforcement learning in surgical decision-making.

Authors:  Tyler J Loftus; Amanda C Filiberto; Yanjun Li; Jeremy Balch; Allyson C Cook; Patrick J Tighe; Philip A Efron; Gilbert R Upchurch; Parisa Rashidi; Xiaolin Li; Azra Bihorac
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Trial Protocol and Data Sharing Statement Missing From Supplements.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Use of a Real-Time Location System to Understand Resident Location in an Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Travis D'Souza; Michael Rosen; Amanda K Bertram; Ariella Apfel; Sanjay V Desai; Brian T Garibaldi
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-06

8.  Incorporating Retrieval Practice Into Intensive Care Unit Teaching Rounds: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Avraham Z Cooper; Nicole Verbeck; Jennifer W McCallister; Carleen R Spitzer
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-01-30

9.  Internal Medicine Residents' Perceptions of Morning Report: a Multicenter Survey.

Authors:  Tyler J Albert; Jeff Redinger; Helene Starks; Joel Bradley; Craig G Gunderson; Dan Heppe; Kyle Kent; Michael Krug; Brian Kwan; James Laudate; Amanda Pensiero; Gina Raymond; Emily Sladek; Joseph R Sweigart; Paul B Cornia
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Electronic Health Record Use among Ophthalmology Residents while on Call.

Authors:  Christopher P Long; Ming Tai-Seale; Robert El-Kareh; Jeffrey E Lee; Sally L Baxter
Journal:  J Acad Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.