INTRODUCTION: This paper describes the different ways in which information is being fed back to health care providers (HCPs) using the Dutch evidence-based KLIK Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) portal (www.hetklikt.nu). KLIK was initially developed for children with a chronic illness and their parents, and recently expanded for use in adult health care. Patients complete online PROMs at home about their health-related quality of life (HRQOL), symptoms and/or psychosocial functioning before an outpatient consultation with their HCP. PROMs are subsequently converted into an individual KLIK electronic (e)PROfile and discussed during the consultation to facilitate systematic attention for HRQOL. METHODS FOR PRO SCORE INTERPRETATION: KLIK includes a variety of different PROMs. The KLIK ePROfile initially consisted of literal representations of the individual PROM items in the European traffic light colors (red, orange, green) and only one graph. Over the years, the KLIK ePROfile evolved into a broader spectrum of feedback options; (1) literal representation of individual items, (2) summary scores, and (3) graphic representations (4 options). DEVELOPING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTING ON PRO RESULTS: The primary goal of KLIK is to longitudinally monitor patient and parent self-reported or proxy-reported health outcomes, which means that the focus of KLIK is not mainly on recommending actions for PRO results. However, there are several aids that help interpretation of the KLIK ePROfile and recommendations are given for actions based on PROM scores. The main aid is the KLIK training, which includes a theoretical and a practical part. In the training, 2 tools-a decision tree and a summary of information about the KLIK ePROfile-are given to the HCPs to assist them in using KLIK. DISCUSSION: Customization of a PROM portal is needed for each different patient group and clinical setting. Because the KLIK website is flexible, every PROM (with good psychometric qualities and permission of the publisher) can be built in. However, implementing and feeding back PROMs in pediatric health care encompasses different challenges, because different versions of the same PROM are needed for children of different ages, as well as proxy and self-report versions.
INTRODUCTION: This paper describes the different ways in which information is being fed back to health care providers (HCPs) using the Dutch evidence-based KLIK Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) portal (www.hetklikt.nu). KLIK was initially developed for children with a chronic illness and their parents, and recently expanded for use in adult health care. Patients complete online PROMs at home about their health-related quality of life (HRQOL), symptoms and/or psychosocial functioning before an outpatient consultation with their HCP. PROMs are subsequently converted into an individual KLIK electronic (e)PROfile and discussed during the consultation to facilitate systematic attention for HRQOL. METHODS FOR PRO SCORE INTERPRETATION: KLIK includes a variety of different PROMs. The KLIK ePROfile initially consisted of literal representations of the individual PROM items in the European traffic light colors (red, orange, green) and only one graph. Over the years, the KLIK ePROfile evolved into a broader spectrum of feedback options; (1) literal representation of individual items, (2) summary scores, and (3) graphic representations (4 options). DEVELOPING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTING ON PRO RESULTS: The primary goal of KLIK is to longitudinally monitor patient and parent self-reported or proxy-reported health outcomes, which means that the focus of KLIK is not mainly on recommending actions for PRO results. However, there are several aids that help interpretation of the KLIK ePROfile and recommendations are given for actions based on PROM scores. The main aid is the KLIK training, which includes a theoretical and a practical part. In the training, 2 tools-a decision tree and a summary of information about the KLIK ePROfile-are given to the HCPs to assist them in using KLIK. DISCUSSION: Customization of a PROM portal is needed for each different patient group and clinical setting. Because the KLIK website is flexible, every PROM (with good psychometric qualities and permission of the publisher) can be built in. However, implementing and feeding back PROMs in pediatric health care encompasses different challenges, because different versions of the same PROM are needed for children of different ages, as well as proxy and self-report versions.
Authors: Johannes Knauer; Yannik Terhorst; Paula Philippi; Selina Kallinger; Sandro Eiler; Reinhold Kilian; Tamara Waldmann; Morten Moshagen; Martina Bader; Harald Baumeister Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Floor Veltkamp; Lorynn Teela; Hedy A van Oers; Lotte Haverman; Antonia H M Bouts Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Samantha J Anthony; Katarina Young; Sarah J Pol; Enid K Selkirk; Tom Blydt-Hansen; Suzanne Boucher; Aviva Goldberg; Lorraine Hamiwka; Lotte Haverman; Joanna Mitchell; Simon Urschel; Maria Santana; Jennifer Stinson; Katie Sutherland; Lori J West Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2021-01-14 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Hedy A van Oers; Lorynn Teela; Sasja A Schepers; Martha A Grootenhuis; Lotte Haverman Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2020-08-15 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Marjon H Cnossen; Iris van Moort; Simone H Reitsma; Moniek P M de Maat; Roger E G Schutgens; Rolf T Urbanus; Hester F Lingsma; Ron A A Mathot; Samantha C Gouw; Karina Meijer; Annelien L Bredenoord; Rieke van der Graaf; Karin Fijnvandraat; Alexander B Meijer; Emile van den Akker; Ruben Bierings; Jeroen C J Eikenboom; Maartje van den Biggelaar; Masja de Haas; Jan Voorberg; Frank W G Leebeek Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 16.036
Authors: Maud M van Muilekom; Michiel A J Luijten; Hedy A van Oers; Caroline B Terwee; Raphaële R L van Litsenburg; Leo D Roorda; Martha A Grootenhuis; Lotte Haverman Journal: J Patient Rep Outcomes Date: 2021-07-10
Authors: Lorynn Teela; Maud M van Muilekom; Lieke H Kooij; Anouk W Gathier; Johannes B van Goudoever; Martha A Grootenhuis; Lotte Haverman; Hedy A van Oers Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Maud M van Muilekom; Lorynn Teela; Hedy A van Oers; Johannes B van Goudoever; Martha A Grootenhuis; Lotte Haverman Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 4.147