Literature DB >> 30985586

Using Machine Learning to Predict Lower-Extremity Injury in US Special Forces.

Chris Connaboy1, Shawn R Eagle, Caleb D Johnson, Shawn D Flanagan, Q I Mi, Bradley C Nindl.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Musculoskeletal injury rates in military personnel remain unacceptably high. Application of machine learning algorithms could be useful in multivariate models to predict injury in this population. The purpose of this study was to investigate if interaction between individual predictors, using a decision tree model, could be used to develop a population-specific algorithm of lower-extremity injury (LEI) risk.
METHODS: One hundred forty Air Force Special Forces Operators (27.4 ± 5.0 yr, 177.6 ± 5.8 cm, 83.8 ± 8.4 kg) volunteered for this prospective cohort study. Baseline testing included body composition, isokinetic strength, flexibility, aerobic/anaerobic capacity, anaerobic power, and landing biomechanics. To evaluate unilateral landing patterns, subjects jumped off two-feet from a distance (40% of their height) over a hurdle and landing single-legged on a force plate. Medical chart reviews were conducted 365 d postbaseline. χ automatic interaction detection (CHAID) was used, which compares predictor variables to LEI and assigns a population-specific "cut-point" for the most relevant predictors.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven percent of operators (n = 38) suffered LEI. A maximum knee flexion angle difference of 25.1% had the highest association with injury in this population (P = 0.006). Operators with >25.1% differences in max knee flexion angle (n = 13) suffered LEI at a 69.2% rate. Seven of the 13 Operators with >25.1% difference in max knee flexion angle weighed >81.8 kg, and 100% of those operators suffered LEI (P = 0.047; n = 7). Only 33% of operators with >25.1% difference in max knee flexion angle that weighed <81.8 kg suffered LEI.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated increased risk of LEI over a 365-d period in Operators with greater differences in single-leg landing strategies and higher body mass. The CHAID approach can be a powerful tool to analyze population-specific risk factors for injury, along with how those factors may interact to enhance risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30985586     DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  4 in total

1.  Unsupervised Clustering Techniques Identify Movement Strategies in the Countermovement Jump Associated With Musculoskeletal Injury Risk During US Marine Corps Officer Candidates School.

Authors:  Matthew B Bird; Qi Mi; Kristen J Koltun; Mita Lovalekar; Brian J Martin; AuraLea Fain; Angelique Bannister; Angelito Vera Cruz; Tim L A Doyle; Bradley C Nindl
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Exploration of Race and Ethnicity, Sex, Sport-Related Concussion, Depression History, and Suicide Attempts in US Youth.

Authors:  Shawn R Eagle; David Brent; Tracey Covassin; Robert J Elbin; Jessica Wallace; Justus Ortega; Raymond Pan; Martina Anto-Ocrah; David O Okonkwo; Michael W Collins; Anthony P Kontos
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-07-01

3.  Development of a Prediction Model for Patients at Risk of Incidental Skin Cancer: A Multicentre Prospective Study.

Authors:  Álvaro Iglesias-Puzas; Alberto Conde-Taboada; Beatriz Aranegui-Arteaga; Eduardo López-Bran
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.875

4.  Development and Validation of a Dynamically Updated Prediction Model for Attrition From Marine Recruit Training.

Authors:  Iris Dijksma; Michel H P Hof; Cees Lucas; Martijn M Stuiver
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.415

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.