Literature DB >> 30985177

Judging the subjective difficulty of different kinds of tasks.

Iman Feghhi1, David A Rosenbaum1.   

Abstract

People judge the relative difficulty of different kinds of tasks all the time, yet little is known about how they do so. We asked university students to choose between tasks that taxed perceptual-motor control and memorization to different degrees. Our participants decided whether to carry a box through a wide (81 cm) or narrow (36 cm) gap after memorizing six, seven, or eight digits. The model that maximized the likelihood of observing the choice data treated the extra physical demand of passing through the narrow gap as functionally equivalent to memorizing an extra .55 digits. Substantively, the model suggested that participants judged the difficulty of the compound tasks in terms of separate resources. The approach introduced here may help interrelate different kinds of task difficulty. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30985177     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  4 in total

1.  Does task sustainability provide a unified measure of subjective task difficulty?

Authors:  David A Rosenbaum; Bill V Bui
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-12

2.  Effort avoidance is not simply error avoidance.

Authors:  Iman Feghhi; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-04-02

3.  Does attention solve the "apples-and-oranges" problems of judging task difficulty and task order?

Authors:  Cory A Potts; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-01-03

4.  Towards a common code for difficulty: Navigating a narrow gap is like memorizing an extra digit.

Authors:  Iman Feghhi; John M Franchak; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 2.199

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.