Literature DB >> 30985073

Two to six-year disease resolution and marginal bone stability rates of a modified resective-implantoplasty therapy in 32 peri-implantitis cases.

Marco A Bianchini1, Maria E Galarraga-Vinueza1,2, Karin Apaza-Bedoya1, Jose M De Souza1, Ricardo Magini1, Frank Schwarz2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Different nonsurgical, antibacterial, surgical, and regenerative approaches to treat peri-implantitis have been proposed, but there is no an actual "gold" standard treatment showing the most favorable results to counteract peri-implantitis effects.
PURPOSE: To evaluate radiographically and clinically the disease resolution and peri-implant marginal bone stability rates of peri-implantitis cases treated through a combined resective-implantoplasty therapy in a moderate to long-term period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of patients diagnosed with peri-implantitis and treated through the same protocol applying a combined resective-implantoplasty therapy with minimum 2-year follow-up were screened. Eligible patients were contacted and asked to undergo clinical and radiologic examination. Progressive marginal bone loss, bleeding on probing, suppuration, implant mobility, and implant fracture were considered to establish the disease resolution rate and peri-implant bone stability of the treated implants.
RESULTS: Twenty-three patients with 32 treated implants fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Over the 2 to 6-year follow-up, (mean time: 3.4 ± 1.5 years), the disease resolution rate was 83% (patient level) and 87% (implant level). Four implants (13%) were lost or removed due to continuous MBL and osseointegration failure. At follow-up, peri-implant marginal bone remained stable with no further bone loss in 87% of the treated implants. BOP was absent in 89.3% (implant level), suppuration was resolved in all cases, and no pain or implant fracture was reported.
CONCLUSION: Implantoplasty treated cases showed high disease resolution rate and peri-implant marginal bone stability. This surgical antibiofilm strategy can counteract peri-implantitis progression providing an adequate environment for implant function and longevity over a moderate to long-term period.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  implant survival; implantoplasty; peri-implant lesions; peri-implantitis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30985073     DOI: 10.1111/cid.12773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  7 in total

1.  Surgical and non-surgical debridement for the treatment of peri-implantitis: a two-center 12-month randomized trial.

Authors:  Tassiane Panta Wagner; Paula Rodrigues Pires; Fernando Silva Rios; Joao Augusto Peixoto de Oliveira; Ricardo Dos Santos Araujo Costa; Kelly F Cunha; Heraldo Luis Dias Silveira; Suzana Pimentel; Marcio Zaffalon Casati; Cassiano Kuchenbecker Rosing; Alex Nogueira Haas
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Strategies to Reduce Biofilm Formation in PEEK Materials Applied to Implant Dentistry-A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Renata Scheeren Brum; Luiza Gomes Labes; Cláudia Ângela Maziero Volpato; César Augusto Magalhães Benfatti; Andrea de Lima Pimenta
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-16

3.  The efficacy of systemic antibiotics as an adjunct to surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Malene Øen; Knut N Leknes; Bodil Lund; Dagmar F Bunæs
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Non-surgical mechanical therapy of peri-implantitis with or without repeated adjunctive diode laser application. A 6-month double-blinded randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Andrea Roccuzzo; Sabrina Klossner; Alexandra Stähli; Jean-Claude Imber; Sigrun Eick; Anton Sculean; Giovanni E Salvi
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 5.021

5.  Histological characteristics of advanced peri-implantitis bone defects in humans.

Authors:  Maria Elisa Galárraga-Vinueza; Stefan Tangl; Marco Bianchini; Ricardo Magini; Karina Obreja; Reinhard Gruber; Frank Schwarz
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2020-03-25

6.  Does implantoplasty affect the failure strength of narrow and regular diameter implants? A laboratory study.

Authors:  Kristina Bertl; Flemming Isidor; Per Vult von Steyern; Andreas Stavropoulos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 7.  Reversal of Osseointegration as a Novel Perspective for the Removal of Failed Dental Implants: A Review of Five Patented Methods.

Authors:  Rolf G Winnen; Kristian Kniha; Ali Modabber; Faruk Al-Sibai; Andreas Braun; Reinhold Kneer; Frank Hölzle
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.