| Literature DB >> 30985017 |
Francesca Palandri1, Giuseppe A Palumbo2, Elisabetta Abruzzese3, Alessandra Iurlo4, Nicola Polverelli5, Elena Elli6, Massimiliano Bonifacio7, Micaela Bergamaschi8, Bruno Martino9, Mario Tiribelli10, Giulia Benevolo11, Alessia Tieghi12, Nicola Sgherza13, Alessandro Isidori14, Gianni Binotto15, Monica Crugnola16, Florian Heidel17, Francesco Cavazzini18, Costanza Bosi19, Giuseppe Auteri1, Daniele Cattaneo4, Robin Foà20, Roberto M Lemoli8, Antonio Cuneo18, Mauro Krampera7, Daniela Bartoletti1, Michele Cavo1, Nicola Vianelli1, Massimo Breccia20, Roberto Latagliata20.
Abstract
The 2016 WHO criteria identified early primary myelofibrosis (PMF) as an individual entity with milder clinical features and better outcome compared with overt PMF. Here, we compared early and overt PMF patients treated with ruxolitinib in terms of baseline clinical/laboratory characteristics, response, and toxicity to treatment. We observed that early-PMF patients achieve better and more stable spleen and symptoms responses, with significantly lower rates of hematological toxicities. No differences in overall and leukemia-free survival were detected between the two cohorts. The application of 2016 WHO criteria is crucial to identify those PMF patients who deserve a stricter monitoring during treatment.Entities:
Keywords: EARLY PMF; MYELOFIBROSIS; OVERT PMF; RUXOLITINIB
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30985017 DOI: 10.1002/hon.2619
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hematol Oncol ISSN: 0278-0232 Impact factor: 5.271