Literature DB >> 3098411

Effects of combined treatments with selenium, glutathione, and vitamin E on glutathione peroxidase activity, ornithine decarboxylase induction, and complete and multistage carcinogenesis in mouse skin.

J P Perchellet, N L Abney, R M Thomas, Y L Guislain, E M Perchellet.   

Abstract

Several structurally different tumor promoters altered to various degrees both glutathione (GSH) peroxidase (EC 1.11.1.9) and ornithine decarboxylase (ODC, L-ornithine carboxy-lyase, EC 4.1.1.17) activities in mouse epidermis in vivo. At 5 h after their application to the skin, the complete tumor promoter 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) and the stage 2 promoter mezerein were the most potent in inhibiting GSH peroxidase activity and inducing ODC activity. In comparison, the effects of anthralin, phorbol-12,13-didecanoate, benzoyl peroxide, H2O2, and phorbol-12,13-dibenzoate were much smaller, whereas the nontumor promoter phorbol, the hyperplastic agent ethyl phenylpropiolate, and the stage 1 promoter 4-O-methyl TPA did not alter GSH peroxidase and ODC activities. Various treatments including i.p. injections of 40 micrograms of Na2SeO3 and 100 mumol of GSH and/or topical applications of 40 mumol of D-alpha-tocopherol (vitamin E) 20 or 15 min, respectively, before tumor promoter treatment inhibited in an additive manner the effects of either TPA or mezerein on both GSH peroxidase activity and ODC induction. Moreover, these Na2SeO3, GSH, and/or vitamin E treatments inhibited in the same additive manner the tumor-promoting activity of TPA in the initiation-promotion protocol. However, when tested in the 2-stage promotion protocol with 4 doses of TPA followed by twice weekly applications of mezerein, Na2SeO3 plus vitamin E and GSH plus vitamin E treatments inhibited remarkably the tumor-promoting activity of mezerein but were ineffective in the first stage of promotion. The sequence and magnitude for the effects of 7,12-dimethylbenz[alpha]anthracene (DMBA) on GSH peroxidase and ODC activities were very different from those of the tumor promoters. In contrast with their antitumor-promoting activity, the treatments with Na2SeO3 plus vitamin E and GSH plus vitamin E failed to inhibit the carcinogenicity of a single large dose of DMBA and even enhanced the induction of skin tumors by repeated applications of subcarcinogenic doses of DMBA. These results suggest that the promoting component of DMBA carcinogenesis may be different from that of TPA. Moreover, the anticarcinogenicity of Na2SeO3, GSH, and vitamin E may be linked to their ability to facilitate or enhance the activity of the natural GSH-dependent antioxidant protective system of the epidermal cells during the later stages of skin tumor promotion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3098411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  7 in total

1.  Imbalance in Protein Thiol Redox Regulation and Cancer-Preventive Efficacy of Selenium.

Authors:  Rayudu Gopalakrishna; Usha Gundimeda; Sarah Zhou; Kristen Zung; Kaitlyn Forell; Arne Holmgren
Journal:  React Oxyg Species (Apex)       Date:  2016-05-25

2.  Temporal changes in tissue glutathione in response to chemical form, dose, and duration of selenium treatment. Relevance to cancer chemoprevention by selenium.

Authors:  H J Thompson; I P Clement
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Effects of vitamin E and vitamin B2 on chromate-induced DNA lesions.

Authors:  M Sugiyama
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  1989 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 4.  Chemopreventive mechanisms of selenium.

Authors:  G F Combs
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-10-15

Review 5.  Why don't we use vitamin E in dermatology?

Authors:  K Pehr; R R Forsey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  The role of vitamin E in normal and damaged skin.

Authors:  F Nachbar; H C Korting
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 7.  Antitumor Effects of Selenium.

Authors:  Seung Jo Kim; Min Chul Choi; Jong Min Park; An Sik Chung
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-31       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.