Literature DB >> 30982649

Bumblebee Rejection of Toxic Pollen Facilitates Pollen Transfer.

Xiao-Yue Wang1, Ju Tang2, Ting Wu2, Di Wu2, Shuang-Quan Huang3.   

Abstract

Many bees are effective pollen collectors; however, pollen grains collected by bees for larval food are lost for plant sexual reproduction. Recognition of these conflicting interests between bees and flowers is essential for understanding of reproduction for both bees and flowers [1-3]. Plant defense compounds in pollen may function to reduce pollen waste by deterring ineffective pollinators [4-6], but this hypothesis remains unexamined. Here, we provide evidence that secondary metabolites in pollen function as chemical defense by deterring some bees from gathering pollen. In two Dipsacus species, a defense compound, dipsacus saponin [7], occurs in pollen but not in nectar. We observed that bumblebees disliked grooming bitter-tasting pollen with a high saponin content. Manipulation of saponin concentrations in nectar and measurements of corbicular pollen showed that the bumblebee species differed in their tolerance to saponin. Those species susceptible to saponin groomed little Dipsacus pollen into their pollen loads, and their ungroomed pollen was observed to be effectively delivered to stigmas. By rewarding bees with edible nectar, but not pollen, plants solve the conflict of pollen partitioning between sexual and reward functions. Ungroomed toxic pollen on the bee body promotes pollen transfer efficiency, facilitating pollination.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bee-flower competition for pollen; chemical defense; conflicting selection; plant-pollinator interactions; pollen delivery; reproductive success; saponin; toxic pollen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30982649     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  4 in total

1.  Understanding pollen specialization in mason bees: a case study of six species.

Authors:  Megan K McAulay; Saff Z Killingsworth; Jessica R K Forrest
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Touch-sensitive stamens enhance pollen dispersal by scaring away visitors.

Authors:  Deng-Fei Li; Wen-Long Han; Susanne S Renner; Shuang-Quan Huang
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  Pollen defenses negatively impact foraging and fitness in a generalist bee (Bombus impatiens: Apidae).

Authors:  Kristen K Brochu; Maria T van Dyke; Nelson J Milano; Jessica D Petersen; Scott H McArt; Brian A Nault; André Kessler; Bryan N Danforth
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Male flowers of Aconitum compensate for toxic pollen with increased floral signals and rewards for pollinators.

Authors:  A-L Jacquemart; C Buyens; M-F Hérent; J Quetin-Leclercq; G Lognay; T Hance; M Quinet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.