Literature DB >> 30982540

Diagnostic Yield of Customized Exercise Provocation Following Routine Testing.

Timothy W Churchill1, Michael Disanto1, Tamanna K Singh1, Erich Groezinger1, Garrett Loomer1, Miranda Contursi1, Milena DiCarli1, Jennifer Michaud-Finch1, Katie Morganti Stewart1, Adolph M Hutter1, Gregory D Lewis1, Rory B Weiner1, Aaron L Baggish1, Meagan M Wasfy2.   

Abstract

Clinical guidelines advocate for customization of exercise testing to address patient-specific diagnostic goals, including reproduction of presenting exertional symptoms. However, the diagnostic yield of adding customized exercise testing to graded exercise in patients presenting with exertional complaints has not been rigorously examined and is the focus of this study. Using prospectively collected data, we analyzed the diagnostic yield of customized additional exercise provocation following inconclusive graded exercise test with measurement of gas exchange. Additional testing was defined as "positive" if it revealed a clinically-actionable diagnosis related to the chief complaint or reproduced symptoms in the absence of an explanatory diagnosis or pathology. Of 1,110 patients who completed a graded test, 122 (11%) symptomatic patients underwent additional customized exercise testing (e.g., sprint intervals and race simulations). Compared with those who did not undergo additional testing, this group was younger (29 [interquartile range 19 to 45] vs 46 [25 to 58] year old) and disproportionately female (43% vs 27%). Presenting symptoms included palpitations (46%), lightheadedness/syncope (25%), chest pain (14%), dyspnea (11%), and exertional intolerance (3%). Additional testing was "positive" in 48 of 122 (39%) of patients by revealing a clinically actionable diagnosis in 26 of 48 (54%) or reproducing symptoms without an explanatory diagnosis in 22 of 48 (46%). In conclusion, while patient-centered customization of exercise testing is suggested by clinical guidelines, these data are the first to demonstrate that the selective addition of customized exercise provocation following inconclusive graded exercise testing improves the diagnostic yield of exercise assessment.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30982540     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.03.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Athletes: Expect the Unexpected.

Authors:  Bradley J Petek; Sarah K Gustus; Meagan M Wasfy
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-05-12

2.  Skin sympathetic nerve activity as a biomarker of fitness.

Authors:  Xiao Liu; Awaneesh Kumar; Joseph O'Neil; Johnson Wong; Osama Saadoon; Siri Kadire; Gloria A Mitscher; Xiaochun Li; Peng-Sheng Chen; Michael S Emery; Thomas H Everett
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  Diagnostic evaluation and cardiopulmonary exercise test findings in young athletes with persistent symptoms following COVID-19.

Authors:  Nathaniel Moulson; Sarah K Gustus; Christina Scirica; Bradley J Petek; Caroyln Vanatta; Timothy W Churchill; James Sawalla Guseh; Aaron Baggish; Meagan M Wasfy
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 18.473

Review 4.  Cardiovascular Care of Masters Athletes.

Authors:  Timothy W Churchill; Aaron L Baggish
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.132

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.