Literature DB >> 30981431

Root Canal Disinfection by Single- and Multiple-instrument Systems: Effects of Sodium Hypochlorite Volume, Concentration, and Retention Time.

Isbelia Gazzaneo1, Gaya C S Vieira1, Alejandro R Pérez1, Flávio R F Alves2, Lucio S Gonçalves1, Ibrahimu Mdala3, José F Siqueira1, Isabela N Rôças1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This ex vivo study evaluated the intracanal bacterial reduction promoted by chemomechanical preparation using a single-file technique varying the volume, concentration, and retention time of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) irrigation in comparison with a multifile system.
METHODS: Palatal roots from extracted maxillary first molars were selected and anatomically matched based on microcomputed tomographic analysis for group distribution. The canals were contaminated with a fresh mixed bacterial culture grown in anaerobiosis and recently obtained from a tooth with apical periodontitis. Specimens were divided into 4 groups of 24 each according to the following preparation protocols: REC-6LOW (Reciproc R50 instrument [VDW, Munich, Germany], 6% NaOCl, low irrigant volume), REC-2.5LOW (R50, 2.5% NaOCl, low irrigant volume), REC-2.5HI (R50, 2.5% NaOCl, high irrigant volume), and BR-2.5HI (BioRaCe [FKG Dentaire, LaChaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland], 2.5% NaOCl, high irrigant volume). The total time of preparation was recorded. Intracanal bacteriologic samples were taken before and after preparation; DNA was extracted and subjected to quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
RESULTS: Bacteria were detected in 22 initial samples from the REC-2.5LOW group and in 23 from the other groups. Intragroup analysis showed that all tested preparation protocols were highly effective in significantly reducing the intracanal bacterial counts (P < .001). Intergroup comparison of bacterial reduction levels revealed a statistically significant difference between BR-2.5HI and REC-2.5LOW (P < .05). Counts of bacteria were 2.5 times significantly higher in REC-2.5LOW compared with BR-2.5HI. No other significant differences were found in quantitative findings (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The concerted effects of multiple instruments, the high volume of irrigation, and the long retention time of NaOCl irrigant had a positive influence on intracanal disinfection during chemomechanical preparation.
Copyright © 2019 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacterial reduction; endodontic treatment; root canal irrigation; root canal preparation; sodium hypochlorite

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30981431     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  9 in total

1.  Effectiveness of XP-Endo Finisher and passive ultrasonic irrigation on intracanal medicament removal from root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiani Zhou; Tingjun Liu; Lihong Guo
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.757

2.  Effect of Propolis Nanoparticles against Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm in the Root Canal.

Authors:  Abhishek Parolia; Haresh Kumar; Srinivasan Ramamurthy; Thiagarajan Madheswaran; Fabian Davamani; Malikarjuna Rao Pichika; Kit-Kay Mak; Amr S Fawzy; Umer Daood; Allan Pau
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Irrigating Solutions and Activation Methods Used in Clinical Endodontics: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Riccardo Tonini; Matteo Salvadori; Elisabetta Audino; Salvatore Sauro; Maria Luisa Garo; Stefano Salgarello
Journal:  Front Oral Health       Date:  2022-01-31

Review 4.  Outcomes of the GentleWave system on root canal treatment: a narrative review.

Authors:  Hernán Coaguila-Llerena; Eduarda Gaeta; Gisele Faria
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2022-02-14

5.  The response of dual-species bacterial biofilm to 2% and 5% NaOCl mixed with etidronic acid: A laboratory real-time evaluation using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Mariana Maciel Batista Borges; René J B Dijkstra; Flaviana Bombarda de Andrade; Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte; Michel Versluis; Lucas W M van der Sluis; Xenos Petridis
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 5.165

Review 6.  A critical analysis of research methods and experimental models to study irrigants and irrigation systems.

Authors:  Christos Boutsioukis; Maria Teresa Arias-Moliz; Luis E Chávez de Paz
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 5.165

7.  Effectiveness of Different Final Irrigation Procedures on Enterococcus faecalis Infected Root Canals: An In Vitro Evaluation.

Authors:  Sanda Ileana Cîmpean; Ioana-Sofia Pop-Ciutrila; Sebastian-Roberto Matei; Ioana Alina Colosi; Carmen Costache; Gheorghe Zsolt Nicula; Iulia Clara Badea; Loredana Colceriu Burtea
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 8.  Present status and future directions: Canal shaping.

Authors:  Ana Arias; Ove A Peters
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.165

Review 9.  Present status and future directions - irrigants and irrigation methods.

Authors:  Christos Boutsioukis; Maria Teresa Arias-Moliz
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 5.165

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.