Suzanne Reed1, Thai Do Minh2, Jens A Lange2, Carol Koro3, Michelle Fox3, Klaas Heinemann2. 1. Berlin Center for Epidemiology and Health Research (ZEG), 10115 Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: reed@zeg-berlin.de. 2. Berlin Center for Epidemiology and Health Research (ZEG), 10115 Berlin, Germany. 3. Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, US.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We conducted this study to characterize the frequency of insertion-, localization- and removal-related events and their clinically significant consequences among Nexplanon® (etonogestrel radiopaque contraceptive implant) users in the United States during standard clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN: The Nexplanon Observational Risk Assessment (NORA) study was a large, prospective cohort study conducted in the United States. A total of 428 Health Care Professionals (HCPs) who had completed the Nexplanon clinical training program recruited women who were newly prescribed Nexplanon. We collected data on insertion-, localization- and removal-related events experienced during routine clinical practice via questionnaires completed by patients and HCPs. Recruitment began in December 2011 and follow-up ended in October 2017. Data analysis characterized the frequency of procedure-related events. RESULTS: We collected data on 7364 insertion procedures. The incidence of incorrect insertion (i.e., initially unrecognized non-insertion, partial insertion or deep insertion) was 12.6 per 1000 insertions (95% CI, 10.2-15.5). Pins and needles/numbness in the arm/hand/fingers was the most common patient-reported event. We obtained data on 5159 removal procedures, of which all were successful but one (due to the location of the implant in deep muscle tissue). No implants were localized outside the arm. The most common challenge reported by HCPs during implant removal was encasement of the implant within fibrotic tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Events associated with the insertion, localization and removal of the Nexplanon contraceptive implant were rare and their clinical consequences were generally not suggestive of serious injury. IMPLICATIONS: This study is the largest prospective evaluation of events associated with insertion and removal of Nexplanon during routine clinical practice. It demonstrates that complications associated with insertion and removal of Nexplanon are rare when performed by trained clinicians.
OBJECTIVES: We conducted this study to characterize the frequency of insertion-, localization- and removal-related events and their clinically significant consequences among Nexplanon® (etonogestrel radiopaque contraceptive implant) users in the United States during standard clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN: The Nexplanon Observational Risk Assessment (NORA) study was a large, prospective cohort study conducted in the United States. A total of 428 Health Care Professionals (HCPs) who had completed the Nexplanon clinical training program recruited women who were newly prescribed Nexplanon. We collected data on insertion-, localization- and removal-related events experienced during routine clinical practice via questionnaires completed by patients and HCPs. Recruitment began in December 2011 and follow-up ended in October 2017. Data analysis characterized the frequency of procedure-related events. RESULTS: We collected data on 7364 insertion procedures. The incidence of incorrect insertion (i.e., initially unrecognized non-insertion, partial insertion or deep insertion) was 12.6 per 1000 insertions (95% CI, 10.2-15.5). Pins and needles/numbness in the arm/hand/fingers was the most common patient-reported event. We obtained data on 5159 removal procedures, of which all were successful but one (due to the location of the implant in deep muscle tissue). No implants were localized outside the arm. The most common challenge reported by HCPs during implant removal was encasement of the implant within fibrotic tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Events associated with the insertion, localization and removal of the Nexplanon contraceptive implant were rare and their clinical consequences were generally not suggestive of serious injury. IMPLICATIONS: This study is the largest prospective evaluation of events associated with insertion and removal of Nexplanon during routine clinical practice. It demonstrates that complications associated with insertion and removal of Nexplanon are rare when performed by trained clinicians.