Zongwu Li1, Fangfei Wang1, Shibao Zhang1. 1. Department of Urology, Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, China.
Abstract
Altered expression of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) has been reported in many malignancies, including prostate cancer. However, the role of lncRNA MNX1-AS1 in prostate cancer has not been reported. Here, we report that MNX1-AS1 is expressed in prostate cancer tissues and cells and that siRNA-mediated knockdown of MNX1-AS1 inhibits proliferation, migration, and invasion of prostate cancer DU145 and PC3 cells. In addition, down-regulation of MNX1-AS1 decreased expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, PH-3, N-cadherin, and vimentin, but enhanced expression of E-cadherin. In conclusion, this is the first report that knockdown of MNX1-AS1 suppresses prostate cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. We believe that MNX1-AS1 may be a potential new therapeutic target for prostate cancer patients.
Altered expression of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) has been reported in many malignancies, including prostate cancer. However, the role of lncRNA MNX1-AS1 in prostate cancer has not been reported. Here, we report that MNX1-AS1 is expressed in prostate cancer tissues and cells and that siRNA-mediated knockdown of MNX1-AS1 inhibits proliferation, migration, and invasion of prostate cancerDU145 and PC3 cells. In addition, down-regulation of MNX1-AS1 decreased expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, PH-3, N-cadherin, and vimentin, but enhanced expression of E-cadherin. In conclusion, this is the first report that knockdown of MNX1-AS1 suppresses prostate cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. We believe that MNX1-AS1 may be a potential new therapeutic target for prostate cancerpatients.
colon cancer‐associated transcript 5Cell Counting Kit‐8epithelial–mesenchymal transitionlong non‐coding RNAproliferating cell nuclear antigenphospho‐histone H3The incidence of prostate cancer ranks second in male malignancies worldwide 1. In the USA, prostate cancer has ascended to the most common cancer in males 2. The incidence of prostate cancer in Asia is much lower than that in Europe and America, but it has been on the rise, and its growth is faster than that in developed countries 3. The risk factors for prostate cancer mainly include age, race, and heredity. New research has shown that dysfunction of steroidogenic enzyme induced by androgen stimulation, DNA methylation, and mRNA alternative splicing is crucial for the development of prostate cancer 4. Additionally, studies also found that p62, the autophagy pathway, the Hippo pathway, epigenetics, and cancer stem cells are involved in the initiation and progression of prostate cancer, and these factors may be potential targets for the treatment of prostate cancer 5. But even so, the pathogenesis of prostate cancer is still not completely known.Long non‐coding RNA (lncRNA) is a type of non‐coding RNA molecule with a transcript length > 200 nt. LncRNA sequences are generally less conserved, but are evolutionarily conserved in promoter regions and secondary structures 6. Most of lncRNAs are generated by RNA polymerase II and have similar biological characteristics to mRNA. In physiological conditions, lncRNA interacts with microRNAs and is involved in regulating the expression of target genes 7. Numerous studies have shown that lncRNA dysfunction occurs in many malignancies, such as lung cancer 8, liver cancer 9, breast cancer 10, and colorectal cancer 11. Although lncRNA plays an important role in the proliferation, progression, metastasis, and apoptosis of tumors, the role of lncRNA in prostate cancer still remains unclear.Lnc‐MNX1‐AS1 is located on chromosome 7, which was firstly discovered in colon cancer and so is also known as colon cancer associated transcript 5 (CCAT5) 12. MNX1‐AS1 has been reported to promote cell proliferation and invasion in many malignancies 13, 14. However, the role of MNX1‐AS1 (CCAT5) in prostate cancer has not been reported.In this study, the expression level of MNX1‐AS1 was determined in prostate cancer tissues and cells. Then, the effects of siRNA‐mediated knockdown of MNX1‐AS1 on proliferation, migration, and invasion of prostate cancer cells were evaluated by functional experiments. To clarify the mechanism by which MNX1‐AS1 regulates prostate cancer cell function, we further tested the expression levels of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), phospho‐histone H3 (PH‐3), E‐cadherin, N‐cadherin and vimentin in prostate cancerDU145 and PC3 cells. We believe our study is beneficial for the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer.
Materials and methods
Patient samples
Prostate cancer samples and normal tissues were collected from patients in Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University. Written informed consent has been provided by each patient and the study methodologies have been approved by the Ethics Committee of Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University. All experiments conform to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Cell culture and siRNA transfection
Humanprostate cancer cell lines (LNCaP, DU145, PC3 and C4‐2) and a human prostate epithelial cell line (RWPE) were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% FBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, 10099158) in a cell incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2. siMNX1‐AS1 and scrambled siRNA plasmids were synthesized by Gene Pharma (Shanghai, China) and transfected using Lipofectamine™ RNAiMAX Transfection Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 13778030) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The transfection efficiency of the cells was detected by qRT‐PCR. Forty‐eight hours after transfection, cells were used for in vitro assays.
qRT‐PCR
Total RNA was extracted with TRIzol™ LS Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 10296010) and cDNA was synthesized from RNA using the Advantage® RT‐for‐PCR Kit [Takara (Dalian), Dalian, Liaoning, China, 639505]. qRT‐PCR was performed by Terra™ qPCR Direct SYBR® Premix [Takara (Dalian), 638319] using a Thermal Cycler Dice™ Real Time System II [Takara (Dalian), TP900].
Detection of prostate cancer cell function
The effects of siRNA‐mediated knockdown of MNX1‐AS1 on the cell viability of prostate cancer was performed by Cell Counting Kit (CCK‐8; Dojindo, Shanghai, China, ck‐04) according to the manufacturer's instructions and colony formation assay. The effects of siRNA‐mediated knockdown of MNX1‐AS1 on the migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells were determined by transwell assay, with the method described by Chen et al. [15.
Western blotting
Total protein was extracted from DU145 and PC3 cells using RIPA Lysis Buffer (YESEN, Shanghai, China, 20101ES60) and protein concentration was determined using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (CST, Boston, MA, USA, no. 7780). Twenty‐five micrograms of proteins was separated by 10% SDS/PAGE and then transferred to a poly(vinylidene difluoride) membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA, IPVH00010). Then, the membrane was blocked in 5% non‐fat milk for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated with the primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. The primary antibodies used were: anti‐PCNA (Abcam, ab29), anti‐histone H3 (phospho S10) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab14955), anti‐E‐cadherin (Abcam, ab1416), anti‐N‐cadherin (Abcam, ab18203), anti‐vimentin (Abcam, ab8978) and anti‐glyceraldehyde 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (Abcam, ab8245). After washing three times with PBST (PBS, Tween‐20, pH7.4), the blots were incubated with secondary antibodies (Abcam, ab6721 and ab6728) at room temperature for 1 h. The poly(vinylidene difluoride) membrane was visualized by ECL assay (KeyGen, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, KGP1128).
Statistical analysis
All values are expressed as the mean ± SD. The two groups were compared using Student's t‐test. The differences between multiple groups were analyzed with one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
MNX1‐AS1 is up‐regulated in prostate cancer tissues and cell lines
We determined the expression level of MNX1‐AS1 in prostate cancer tissues and adjacent normal tissues (n = 70) using qRT‐PCR. As shown in Fig. 1A, the expression of MNX1‐AS1 mRNA was significantly up‐regulated in tumor tissues compared with corresponding normal tissues (P < 0.001). Next, several humanprostate cancer cell lines (LNCaP, DU145, PC3 and C4‐2) and one human prostate epithelial cell line (RWPE) were used to detect the expression of MNX1‐AS1 mRNA. The results showed that the expression level of MNX1‐AS1 in tumor cells (LNCaP, DU145, PC3, and C4‐2) was significantly higher than that in RWPE cells (P < 0.01; Fig. 1B). These results indicate that MNX1‐AS1 may be a prognostic and therapeutic biomarker in prostate cancerpatients.
Figure 1
is up‐regulated in prostate cancer. (A) The expression of was determined by qRT‐PCR in prostate tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues (n = 70). Data were plotted using prism 5.0. ***P < 0.001, compared with adjacent tissues, Student's t‐test. (B) The expression of was determined by qRT‐PCR in human prostate cancer LNCaP, DU145, PC3 and C4‐2 cell lines and human prostate epithelial RWPE cell. Data were processed with prism 5.0. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, compared with RWPE cells, one‐way ANOVA.
is up‐regulated in prostate cancer. (A) The expression of was determined by qRT‐PCR in prostate tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues (n = 70). Data were plotted using prism 5.0. ***P < 0.001, compared with adjacent tissues, Student's t‐test. (B) The expression of was determined by qRT‐PCR in humanprostate cancerLNCaP, DU145, PC3 and C4‐2 cell lines and human prostate epithelial RWPE cell. Data were processed with prism 5.0. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, compared with RWPE cells, one‐way ANOVA.
Down‐regulation of MNX1‐AS1 inhibits prostate cancer cell proliferation
To further explore the effects of MNX1‐AS1 on prostatic cancer cell function, two specific siRNAs (siMNX1‐AS1#1 and siMNX1‐AS1#2) were used to knock down MNX1‐AS1, and their efficiency was tested in prostatic cancerDU145 and PC3 cells (Fig. 2A). Then, the cell viability of DU145 and PC3 cells transfected with MNX1‐AS1 siRNAs or negative control siRNA was evaluated using the CCK‐8 assay. As shown in Fig. 2B, the prostatic cell viability was significantly inhibited by down‐regulation of MNX1‐AS1 compared with the control group (P < 0.001). Then, we performed a colony formation assay, and the results showed that knocking down MNX1‐AS1 effectively inhibited the formation of colonies derived from DU145 and PC3 prostatic cells compared with the control group (P < 0.001; Fig. 2C). Thus, these data revealed that MNX1‐AS1 is able to promote cell proliferation in prostate cancer.
Figure 2
Down‐regulation of inhibits the proliferation of prostate cancer cells. (A) The silencing efficacy of was measured by qRT‐PCR in DU145 and PC3 cells. Data were processed with prism 5.0. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, compared with siNC, one‐way ANOVA. (B) CCK‐8 assay was used to detect the viability of DU145 and PC3 cells transfected with siR‐MNX1‐AS1. Data were plotted with prism 5.0. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. ***P < 0.001, compared with siNC, one‐way ANOVA. (C) Clone formation assay was used to detect the viability of DU145 and PC3 cells transfected with siR‐MNX1‐AS1. Data were processed with prism 5.0. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. ***P < 0.001, compared with siNC, Student's t‐test.
Down‐regulation of inhibits the proliferation of prostate cancer cells. (A) The silencing efficacy of was measured by qRT‐PCR in DU145 and PC3 cells. Data were processed with prism 5.0. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, compared with siNC, one‐way ANOVA. (B) CCK‐8 assay was used to detect the viability of DU145 and PC3 cells transfected with siR‐MNX1‐AS1. Data were plotted with prism 5.0. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. ***P < 0.001, compared with siNC, one‐way ANOVA. (C) Clone formation assay was used to detect the viability of DU145 and PC3 cells transfected with siR‐MNX1‐AS1. Data were processed with prism 5.0. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. ***P < 0.001, compared with siNC, Student's t‐test.
Down‐regulation of MNX1‐AS1 inhibits prostate cancer cell migration and invasion
The migration and invasion of prostatic cells seriously affect the prognosis and survival of prostate patients. Next, a transwell assay was performed to determine whether MNX1‐AS1 affected the migratory and invasive potential of prostatic cancer cells. Firstly, the number of prostatic cells passed through the transwell membrane was observed to be reduced by siRNA‐mediated knockdown of MNX1‐AS1, suggesting that down‐regulation of MNX1‐AS1 could inhibit prostatic cancer cell migration in vitro (P < 0.01; Fig. 3A). Moreover, the transwell invasion assay also showed that suppression of MNX1‐AS1 could significantly restrain the invasive ability of DU145 and PC3 cells (P < 0.01; Fig. 3B).
Figure 3
Down‐regulation of inhibits the migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells. (A) Transwell assay was performed to analyze the migration of DU145 and PC3 cells transfected with siR‐MNX1‐AS1. Data were processed with prism 5.0. Scale bar = 2.5 μm. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. **P < 0.01, compared with siNC, one‐way ANOVA. (B) Transwell assay was performed to analyze the invasion of DU145 and PC3 cells transfected with siR‐MNX1‐AS1. Data were processed with prism 5.0. Scale bar = 2.5 μm. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. **P < 0.01, compared with siNC, one‐way ANOVA.
Down‐regulation of inhibits the migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells. (A) Transwell assay was performed to analyze the migration of DU145 and PC3 cells transfected with siR‐MNX1‐AS1. Data were processed with prism 5.0. Scale bar = 2.5 μm. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. **P < 0.01, compared with siNC, one‐way ANOVA. (B) Transwell assay was performed to analyze the invasion of DU145 and PC3 cells transfected with siR‐MNX1‐AS1. Data were processed with prism 5.0. Scale bar = 2.5 μm. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. **P < 0.01, compared with siNC, one‐way ANOVA.
MNX1‐AS1 regulates the expression of related mRNAs and proteins in prostate cancer cells
Having proven that knockdown of MNX1‐AS1 was able to inhibit the proliferative, migratory, and invasive ability of prostate cancer cells, we then explored the specific mechanism. At first, the mRNA expression level of PCNA and PH‐3 was tested after knocking down MNX1‐AS1 in DU145 and PC3 cells. The results indicated that these proliferative markers were observably decreased by knockdown of MNX1‐AS1 at the mRNA level compared with NC cells, which suggested that MNX1‐AS1 might promote the proliferation of prostate cancer cells via regulating PCNA and PH‐3 (Fig. 4A). Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is critical for cell migration and invasion of prostate cancer, and E‐cadherin, N‐cadherin and vimentin are the markers of EMT. We also found knockdown of MNX1‐AS1 promoted E‐cadherin mRNA expression whereas it inhibited N‐cadherin and vimentin mRNA expression in DU145 and PC3 cells compared with the control, indicating that MNX1‐AS1 might induce the migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells via regulating EMT (Fig. 4A). Similarly, results from western blotting also showed that the protein expression of PCNA, PH‐3, N‐cadherin and vimentin was reduced significantly, but the E‐cadherin expression was enhanced by down‐regulation of MNX1‐AS1 in DU145 and PC3 cells (Fig. 4B).
Figure 4
regulates the expression of related mRNAs and proteins in prostate cancer cells. (A) The mRNA expressions of PCNA, PH‐3, E‐cadherin, N‐cadherin and vimentin in DU145 and PC3 cells transfected with siR‐MNX1‐AS1. Data were processed with prism 5.0. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, compared with siNC, one‐way ANOVA. (B) The protein expressions of PCNA, PH‐3, E‐cadherin, N‐cadherin and vimentin in DU145 and PC3 cells transfected with siR‐MNX1‐AS1. Data were processed with prism 5.0.
regulates the expression of related mRNAs and proteins in prostate cancer cells. (A) The mRNA expressions of PCNA, PH‐3, E‐cadherin, N‐cadherin and vimentin in DU145 and PC3 cells transfected with siR‐MNX1‐AS1. Data were processed with prism 5.0. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, compared with siNC, one‐way ANOVA. (B) The protein expressions of PCNA, PH‐3, E‐cadherin, N‐cadherin and vimentin in DU145 and PC3 cells transfected with siR‐MNX1‐AS1. Data were processed with prism 5.0.
Discussion and conclusion
Although it is known that lncRNA plays a crucial role in gene regulatory processes and it is closely related to the pathogenesis of various cancers 16, the relationship between lncRNA and prostate cancer is still poorly understood. CCAT is a type of lncRNA first discovered in colon cancer, named CCAT1, CCAT2, CCAT3, CCAT4, and CCAT5 (namely MNX1‐AS1) according to the order of discovery. Dysregulation of CCAT has been shown in various types of cancers 17. Jiang et al. 18 reported that activation of CCAT1 by TP63 and SOX2 was able to promote squamous cancer progression. Li et al. 19 found that silencing of CCAT1 inhibits cell proliferation, invasion, and peritoneal metastasis via down‐regulating Bmi‐1 in gastric cancer. Notably, Liu et al. 20 reported that CCAT1 can restrain prostate cancer migration via altering macrophage polarization. However, the biological functions and mechanisms of CCAT5/MNX1‐AS1 in prostate cancer have not been reported.In the present study, we compared the differences in expression level of MNX1‐AS1 between prostate cancer and normal prostate tissues/cells and found that MNX1‐AS1 was significantly up‐regulated in prostate cancer (Fig. 1). Related studies demonstrated that lncRNA plays a key role in cell proliferation of prostate cancer 21. We performed a CCK‐8 assay (Fig. 2B) and clone formation assay (Fig. 2C) to detect prostate cancer cell proliferation after knocking down MNX1‐AS1, and found that MNX1‐AS1 plays a significant role in proliferation of prostate cancerDU145 and PC3 cells, which was in agreement with the previous research 21. Additionally, it was reported that up‐regulation of CCAT1 could promote EMT in several malignancies, including prostate cancer 22. As well, results from the transwell assay showed that MNX1‐AS1 is crucial for prostate cancer cell migration (Fig. 3A) and invasion (Fig. 3B).We wanted to know how MNX1‐AS1 regulates prostatic cancer cell function. PCNA is synthesized in the nucleus and is an accessory protein of DNA polymerase δ 23. PCNA is closely related to cellular DNA synthesis and is a good biomarker for cell proliferation 24. PH‐3 has a temporal and spatial correlation with chromosome agglutination and deagglutination during cell mitosis 25. In this study, the expression of PCNA and PH‐3 was observably decreased after knocking down MNX1‐AS1 at both the mRNA and the protein level, indicating that MNX1‐AS1 might promote the proliferation of prostate cancer cells via targeting PCNA and PH‐3. In addition, Søgaard et al. 26 reported that targeting PCNA has the potential to improve docetaxel therapy for prostate cancer, suggesting that down‐regulation of MNX1‐AS1 might be a potential therapeutic strategy for prostatic cancer.Prostate cancer‐related deaths are often caused by metastasis of tumor cells, and EMT plays an important role in tumor metastasis 27. The main features of EMT include the abnormal expressions of cell adhesion molecules (E‐cadherin and N‐cadherin) and the transformation of cytokeratin into vimentin 28, 29. Through EMT, epithelial cells lose the attachment to the basement membrane and obtain more interstitial phenotypes such as high migration and invasion, anti‐apoptosis, and the ability to degrade the extracellular matrix 30. This study also showed that knockdown of MNX1‐AS1 promoted E‐cadherin expression whereas it inhibited expression of N‐cadherin and vimentin in prostate cancer cells, indicating that MNX1‐AS1 might promote the migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells via regulating EMT. In summary, this is the first report showing that knockdown of MNX1‐AS1 restrains prostate cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. We believe our finding has positive clinical significance in prostate cancer therapy.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author contributions
ZL and FW conducted experiments and were responsible for data acquisition, analysis, interpretation, and manuscript writing. SZ conceived and designed the study, and revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors: Nicholas Howard; Marco Clementino; Donghern Kim; Lei Wang; Angela Verma; Xianglin Shi; Zhuo Zhang; Robert S DiPaola Journal: Semin Cancer Biol Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 15.707
Authors: Cristian Arriaga-Canon; Inti Alberto De La Rosa-Velázquez; Rodrigo González-Barrios; Rogelio Montiel-Manríquez; Diego Oliva-Rico; Francisco Jiménez-Trejo; Carlo Cortés-González; Luis A Herrera Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2018-04-17