Literature DB >> 30980264

Comparison of microbiological results obtained from per-wound bone biopsies versus transcutaneous bone biopsies in diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a prospective cohort study.

Alice Couturier1, Aurore Chabaud2, Françoise Desbiez3, Stéphane Descamps4, Evelina Petrosyan5, Paule Letertre-Gilbert5, Natacha Mrozek5, Magali Vidal5, Igor Tauveron3, Salwan Maqdasy3, Olivier Lesens5.   

Abstract

Transcutaneous bone biopsy (TCB) is the gold standard for taking microbiological specimens in diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO), but this technique is not widely used in diabetic foot care centers. We aimed to evaluate the reliability of per-wound bone biopsy (PWB) cultures by comparing them with concomitant TCB cultures obtained through healthy skin. This is a prospective monocentric study including patients seen in consultation for clinical and radiological diabetic foot osteomyelitis with positive probe-bone tests between April 2015 and May 2018. Two bone biopsies were performed on each consenting patient: TCB through a cutaneous incision in healthy skin, and PWB, after careful debridement of the wound. A total of 46 paired cultures were available from 43 eligible patients. Overall, 16 (42%) of the PWB and TCB pairs had identical culture results, but the TCB cultures were sterile in 8 (17%) cases. For 38 paired cultures with positive TCB, the correlation between PWB results and TCB results was 58.4%. PWB revealed all microorganisms found in the transcutaneous specimen in 26/38 samples (68.5%). In patients with DFO, the culture results of specimens taken by per-wound biopsies did not correlate well with those obtained by TCB. PWB should be reserved for cases where the transcutaneous biopsy is sterile or not feasible.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone biopsy; Correlation; Diabetic foot; Diabetic foot osteomyelitis; Osteomyelitis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30980264     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-019-03547-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  3 in total

1.  The association between bacteria and outcome and the influence of sampling method, in people with a diabetic foot infection.

Authors:  Meryl Cinzía Tila Tamara Gramberg; Shaya Krishnaa Normadevi Mahadew; Birgit Ilja Lissenberg-Witte; Marielle Petra Bleijenberg; Jara Rebekka de la Court; Jarne Marijn van Hattem; Louise Willy Elizabeth Sabelis; Rimke Sabine Lagrand; Vincent de Groot; Martin Den Heijer; Edgar Josephus Gerardus Peters
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 7.455

2.  Percutaneous Bone Biopsy for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Marcos C Schechter; Mohammed K Ali; Benjamin B Risk; Adam D Singer; Gabriel Santamarina; Hannah K Rogers; Ravi R Rajani; Guillermo Umpierrez; Maya Fayfman; Russell R Kempker
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 3.835

3.  Microbiological Concordance in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Infections with Osteomyelitis, on the Basis of Cultures of Different Specimens at a Diabetic Foot Center in China.

Authors:  Xuemei Li; Qingfeng Cheng; Zhipeng Du; Shenyin Zhu; Chao Cheng
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.168

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.