Literature DB >> 30980222

Implementation of outcome measurement (HoNOS) in an outpatient psychiatric clinic in Sligo/Leitrim mental health service.

James Sweeney1, Dimitrios Adamis2, Luqman Helmi2, Alastair J D Macdonald3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Routine clinical outcome monitoring (RCOM) is the standardised gathering of measures of clinical outcomes in everyday practice. HoNOS (Health of the Nation Outcome Scales) is a tool used in RCOM. AIMS: To examine (a) agreement between HoNOS and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), (b) HoNOS changes over time/attendance and (c) clinical parameters affecting HoNOS scores.
METHODS: Data from outpatient clinics were collected at each contact over 2 years until June 2016 including: gender, age, diagnosis (ICD-10) and HoNOS scores. In a subsample, the GAF also were completed by community psychiatric nurses blind to HoNOS scores.
RESULTS: A number of 470 outpatients have undergone 1125 HoNOS assessments during the study period. Mean age of the attendants was 43.12; SD 14.6. Male = 220 (46.8%). Longitudinal analysis demonstrated that lower HoNOS scores are independently significantly associated to number of assessments and diagnosis in ICD-10 categories of F20-F29 (Schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders) F30-F39 (mood disorders) F40-F48 (neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders) and F50-F59 (behavioural disorders associated with physiological disturbances). Gender and age were not significantly associated with decline of HoNOS scores. Neither were other diagnostic categories. Agreement between HoNOS and GAF was excellent (N = 261, rho = - 0.919, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that HoNOS is a feasible instrument which can be potentially used in ROCM in mental health services in Ireland and supports further the need for implementation of routine measurements in Mental Health Services. It adds longitudinal data which is lacking in similar previous studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HoNOS; Ireland; Outcomes; Outpatient; Psychiatry

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30980222     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-019-02015-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  24 in total

1.  A randomized-controlled trial of intensive case management emphasizing the recovery model among patients with severe and enduring mental illness.

Authors:  S O'Brien; J McFarland; B Kealy; A Pullela; J Saunders; W Cullen; D Meagher
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Objections to routine clinical outcomes measurement in mental health services: any evidence so far?

Authors:  Alastair J D MacDonald; Tom Trauer
Journal:  J Ment Health       Date:  2010-12

3.  Introduction of routine outcome measures: staff reactions and issues for consideration.

Authors:  T Meehan; S McCombes; L Hatzipetrou; R Catchpoole
Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.952

4.  Improving clinicians' attitudes toward providing feedback on routine outcome assessments.

Authors:  Aimee Willis; Frank P Deane; Tim Coombs
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.503

5.  Meaningful information or a bureaucratic exercise? Exploring the value of routine outcome measurement in mental health.

Authors:  Brenda Happell
Journal:  Issues Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.835

6.  The effect of guidance in the use of routine outcome measures in clinical meetings.

Authors:  Tom Trauer; Glenda Pedwell; Lisa Gill
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.990

7.  The impact of a specialized inpatient and day patient group programme on clinical outcome in older adolescents and young adults with mental illness.

Authors:  P McCrossan; A Ryan; M Connellan; P Power
Journal:  Ir J Psychol Med       Date:  2017-03

8.  Evaluating the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. Reliability and validity in a three-year follow-up of first-onset psychosis.

Authors:  S Amin; S P Singh; T Croudace; P Jones; I Medley; G Harrison
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.319

9.  Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. Results of the Victorian field trial.

Authors:  T Trauer; T Callaly; P Hantz; J Little; R Shields; J Smith
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.319

10.  Performance of routine outcome measures in adult mental health care.

Authors:  Kathy Eagar; Tom Trauer; Graham Mellsop
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.744

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.