Literature DB >> 3097893

Comparison of the immunosuppressive effects of cyclosporine, lipid-soluble anesthetics, and calmodulin antagonists. Response to exogenous interleukin 2.

S J LeGrue, C G Munn.   

Abstract

The purpose of these investigations was to compare the immunosuppressive mechanism of cyclosporine (CsA) with those of lipid-soluble local anesthetics and calmodulin antagonists. Chlorpromazine (CPZ) and pentobarbital (PB) both inhibit lymphocyte activation by attenuating sodium and potassium ion potentials. CPZ and N-(6-aminohexyl)-5-chloro-1-naphthalene sulfonamide (W-7) can also block calcium-dependent activation processes by inhibition of calmodulin and protein kinase C. All four compounds were found to suppress human and murine lymphoproliferation to both alloantigen or mitogen in a dose-dependent and saturable manner. Exogenous interleukin-2 (IL-2) restored mitogenic responsiveness to cultures suppressed using W-7 and CsA, but not to lymphocytes suppressed with either CPZ or PB. Cytofluorographic analysis revealed that the degree of suppression in drug-treated lymphocytes was significantly correlated with the surface expression of receptors for transferrin and interleukin-2. Inhibition of IL-2 activation by PB was demonstrated to result from a blockade of the mitogenic growth factor signal using the IL-2-dependent cell line HT-2. Thus, the mechanism of action of cyclosporine can be differentiated from those of anesthetic immunosuppressants at the level of responsiveness to interleukin-2. The data support the hypothesis that cyclosporine may be an antagonist of calmodulin that selectively blocks early events in T lymphocyte activation leading to IL-2 synthesis, but does not inhibit the expression or function of the IL-2 receptor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3097893     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-198612000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  5 in total

1.  Why does GM1 induce a potent beneficial response to experimental Chagas disease?

Authors:  S Cossy Isasi; C A Condat; G J Sibona
Journal:  HFSP J       Date:  2009-01-21

2.  Inhibition of cyclosporin A/FK506 resistant, lymphokine-induced T-cell activation by phenothiazine derivatives.

Authors:  M Schleuning; V Brumme; W Wilmanns
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Prolactin and cyclosporine modulate adenosine transporters and adenosine A1 receptors in the rat brain.

Authors:  M D Fideu; A Arce; M T Miras-Portugal; A I Esquifino
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.158

4.  Immunosuppressive and anti-proliferative effects of a macrotetrolide antibiotic, tetranactin.

Authors:  Y Tanouchi; H Shichi
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 7.397

5.  Mutually exclusive regulation of T cell survival by IL-7R and antigen receptor-induced signals.

Authors:  Paul Koenen; Susanne Heinzel; Emma M Carrington; Lina Happo; Warren S Alexander; Jian-Guo Zhang; Marco J Herold; Clare L Scott; Andrew M Lew; Andreas Strasser; Philip D Hodgkin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.