Karina Negron1, Namir Khalasawi2, Billy Lu3, Chi-Ying Ho4, Jason Lee5, Siddharth Shenoy6, Hai-Quan Mao7, Tza-Huei Wang8, Justin Hanes9, Jung Soo Suk10. 1. Center for Nanomedicine at the Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, United States of America; Department of Pharmacology & Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America. 2. Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America. 3. Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America. 4. Center for Nanomedicine at the Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, United States of America; Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America. 5. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America. 6. Center for Nanomedicine at the Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, United States of America; Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, United States of America. 7. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America; Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, United States of America; Department of Material Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America; Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America. 8. Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America. 9. Center for Nanomedicine at the Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, United States of America; Department of Pharmacology & Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States of America; Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America; Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, United States of America. 10. Center for Nanomedicine at the Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, United States of America; Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States of America; Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, United States of America. Electronic address: jsuk@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
Gene therapy of malignant gliomas has shown a lack of clinical success to date due in part to inability of conventional gene vectors to achieve widespread gene transfer throughout highly disseminated tumor areas within the brain. Here, we demonstrate that newly engineered polymer-based DNA-loaded nanoparticles (DNA-NP) possessing small particle diameters (~50 nm) and non-adhesive surface polyethylene glycol (PEG) coatings efficiently penetrate brain tumor tissue as well as healthy brain parenchyma. Specifically, this brain-penetrating nanoparticle (BPN), following intracranial administration via convection enhanced delivery (CED), provides widespread transgene expression in heathy rodent striatum and an aggressive brain tumor tissue established orthotopically in rats. The ability of BPN to efficiently traverse both tissues is of great importance as the highly invasive glioma cells infiltrated into normal brain tissue are responsible for tumor recurrence. Of note, the transgene expression within the orthotopic tumor tissue occurred preferentially in glioma cells over microglial cells. We also show that three-dimensional (3D) multicellular spheroids established with malignant glioma cells, unlike conventional two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures, serve as an excellent in vitro model reliably predicting gene vector behaviors in vivo. Briefly, DNA-NP possessing greater surface PEG coverage exhibited more uniform and higher-level transgene expression both in the 3D model and in vivo, whereas the trend was opposite in 2D culture. The finding here alerts that gene transfer studies based primarily on 2D cultures should be interpreted with caution and underscores the relevance of 3D models for screening newly engineered gene vectors prior to their in vivo evaluation.
Gene therapy of n class="Disease">malignant gliomas has shown a lack of clinical success to date due in part to inability of conventional gene vectors to achieve widespread gene transfer throughout highly disseminated n class="Disease">tumor areas within the brain. Here, we demonstrate that newly engineered polymer-based DNA-loaded nanoparticles (DNA-NP) possessing small particle diameters (~50 nm) and non-adhesive surface polyethylene glycol (PEG) coatings efficiently penetrate brain tumor tissue as well as healthy brain parenchyma. Specifically, this brain-penetrating nanoparticle (BPN), following intracranial administration via convection enhanced delivery (CED), provides widespread transgene expression in heathy rodent striatum and an aggressive brain tumor tissue established orthotopically in rats. The ability of BPN to efficiently traverse both tissues is of great importance as the highly invasive glioma cells infiltrated into normal brain tissue are responsible for tumor recurrence. Of note, the transgene expression within the orthotopic tumor tissue occurred preferentially in glioma cells over microglial cells. We also show that three-dimensional (3D) multicellular spheroids established with malignant glioma cells, unlike conventional two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures, serve as an excellent in vitro model reliably predicting gene vector behaviors in vivo. Briefly, DNA-NP possessing greater surface PEG coverage exhibited more uniform and higher-level transgene expression both in the 3D model and in vivo, whereas the trend was opposite in 2D culture. The finding here alerts that gene transfer studies based primarily on 2D cultures should be interpreted with caution and underscores the relevance of 3D models for screening newly engineered gene vectors prior to their in vivo evaluation.
Authors: M V Matz; A F Fradkov; Y A Labas; A P Savitsky; A G Zaraisky; M L Markelov; S A Lukyanov Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Jürgen Voges; Friedrich Weber; Regina Reszka; Volker Sturm; Andreas Jacobs; Wolf-Dieter Heiss; Ottmar Wiestler; Joachim Friedrich Kapp Journal: Hum Gene Ther Date: 2002-03-20 Impact factor: 5.695
Authors: Juergen Voges; Regina Reszka; Axel Gossmann; Claus Dittmar; Raphaela Richter; Guido Garlip; Lutz Kracht; Heinz H Coenen; Volker Sturm; Karl Wienhard; Wolf-Dieter Heiss; Andreas H Jacobs Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Daniel G Anderson; Weidan Peng; Akin Akinc; Naushad Hossain; Anat Kohn; Robert Padera; Robert Langer; Janet A Sawicki Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-11-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: A Gambotto; G Dworacki; V Cicinnati; T Kenniston; J Steitz; T Tüting; P D Robbins; A B DeLeo Journal: Gene Ther Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Colleen T Curley; Brian P Mead; Karina Negron; Namho Kim; William J Garrison; G Wilson Miller; Kathryn M Kingsmore; E Andrew Thim; Ji Song; Jennifer M Munson; Alexander L Klibanov; Jung Soo Suk; Justin Hanes; Richard J Price Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Curtis Dobrowolski; Kalina Paunovska; Marine Z C Hatit; Melissa P Lokugamage; James E Dahlman Journal: Adv Healthc Mater Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 11.092
Authors: Chad A Caraway; Hallie Gaitsch; Elizabeth E Wicks; Anita Kalluri; Navya Kunadi; Betty M Tyler Journal: Polymers (Basel) Date: 2022-07-21 Impact factor: 4.967