AIM: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major healthcare burden, and prognosis is critical in decision-making for treatment and the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep-learning-based out-of-hospital cardiac arrest prognostic system (DCAPS) for predicting neurologic recovery and survival to discharge. METHODS: The study subjects were patients from the Korea OHCA registry who experienced return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after OHCA. A total of 36,190 patients were exclusively divided into a set of 28,045 subjects for derivation data and 8,145 subjects for validation data. We used information available for the time of ROSC as predictor variables, and the endpoints were neurologic recovery (cerebral performance category 1 or 2) and survival to discharge. The DCAPS was developed using the derivation data and represented the favorability of prognosis with a score between 0 and 100. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of DCAPS for predicting neurologic recovery for the validation data was 0.953 [95% confidence interval 0.952-0.954]; these results significantly outperformed those of logistic regression (0.947 [0.943-0.948]), random forest (0.943 [0.942-0.945]), support vector machine (0.930 [0.929-0.932]), and conventional methods of a previous study (0.817 [0.815-0.820]). The AUROC of the DCAPS for survival to discharge was 0.901 [0.900-0.903], and this result significantly outperformed those of other models as well. CONCLUSIONS: The DCAPS predicted neurologic recovery and survival to discharge of OHCA patients accurately and outperformed the conventional method and other machine-learning methods.
AIM: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major healthcare burden, and prognosis is critical in decision-making for treatment and the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep-learning-based out-of-hospital cardiac arrest prognostic system (DCAPS) for predicting neurologic recovery and survival to discharge. METHODS: The study subjects were patients from the Korea OHCA registry who experienced return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after OHCA. A total of 36,190 patients were exclusively divided into a set of 28,045 subjects for derivation data and 8,145 subjects for validation data. We used information available for the time of ROSC as predictor variables, and the endpoints were neurologic recovery (cerebral performance category 1 or 2) and survival to discharge. The DCAPS was developed using the derivation data and represented the favorability of prognosis with a score between 0 and 100. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of DCAPS for predicting neurologic recovery for the validation data was 0.953 [95% confidence interval 0.952-0.954]; these results significantly outperformed those of logistic regression (0.947 [0.943-0.948]), random forest (0.943 [0.942-0.945]), support vector machine (0.930 [0.929-0.932]), and conventional methods of a previous study (0.817 [0.815-0.820]). The AUROC of the DCAPS for survival to discharge was 0.901 [0.900-0.903], and this result significantly outperformed those of other models as well. CONCLUSIONS: The DCAPS predicted neurologic recovery and survival to discharge of OHCA patients accurately and outperformed the conventional method and other machine-learning methods.
Authors: Theresa M Olasveengen; Federico Semeraro; Giuseppe Ristagno; Maaret Castren; Anthony Handley; Artem Kuzovlev; Koenraad G Monsieurs; Violetta Raffay; Michael Smyth; Jasmeet Soar; Hildigunnur Svavarsdóttir; Gavin D Perkins Journal: Notf Rett Med Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 0.826
Authors: Samuel Harford; Marina Del Rios; Sara Heinert; Joseph Weber; Eddie Markul; Katie Tataris; Teri Campbell; Terry Vanden Hoek; Houshang Darabi Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2022-01-25 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Ji Han Heo; Taegyun Kim; Jonghwan Shin; Gil Joon Suh; Joonghee Kim; Yoon Sun Jung; Seung Min Park; Sungwan Kim Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Jesper Johnsson; Ola Björnsson; Peder Andersson; Andreas Jakobsson; Tobias Cronberg; Gisela Lilja; Hans Friberg; Christian Hassager; Jesper Kjaergard; Matt Wise; Niklas Nielsen; Attila Frigyesi Journal: Crit Care Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Sheetal Chaudhuri; Andrew Long; Hanjie Zhang; Caitlin Monaghan; John W Larkin; Peter Kotanko; Shashi Kalaskar; Jeroen P Kooman; Frank M van der Sande; Franklin W Maddux; Len A Usvyat Journal: Semin Dial Date: 2020-09-13 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Firdaus Aziz; Sorayya Malek; Khairul Shafiq Ibrahim; Raja Ezman Raja Shariff; Wan Azman Wan Ahmad; Rosli Mohd Ali; Kien Ting Liu; Gunavathy Selvaraj; Sazzli Kasim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 3.240