Literature DB >> 30978329

Epidemiology of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Criteria in Undifferentiated Patients and Association With Suspected Infection and Sepsis.

Vijay Anand1, Zilu Zhang2, Sameer S Kadri3, Michael Klompas4, Chanu Rhee5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) criteria in sepsis screening and management is controversial, particularly as they were derived only in patients with suspected infection. We examined the epidemiology and prognostic value of qSOFA in undifferentiated patients.
METHODS: We identified patients with ≥ 2 qSOFA criteria within 1 day of admission among all adults admitted to 85 US hospitals from 2012 to 2015 and assessed for suspected infection (using clinical cultures and administration of antibiotics) and sepsis (as defined on the basis of Sepsis-3 criteria). We also examined the discrimination of qSOFA for in-hospital mortality among patients with and without suspected infection, using regression models.
RESULTS: Of 1,004,347 hospitalized patients, 271,500 (27.0%) were qSOFA-positive on admission. Compared with qSOFA-negative patients, qSOFA-positive patients were older (median age, 65 vs 58 years), required ICU admission more often (28.5% vs 6.5%), and had higher mortality (6.7% vs 0.8%) (P < .001 for all comparisons). Sensitivities of qSOFA for suspected infection and sepsis were 41.3% (95% CI, 41.1%-41.5%) and 62.8% (95% CI, 62.4%-63.1%), respectively; positive predictive values were 31.0% (95% CI, 30.8%-31.1%) and 17.4% (95% CI, 17.2%-17.5%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for mortality was lower for qSOFA in patients with suspected infection vs those without (0.814 vs 0.875; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Only one in three patients who are qSOFA-positive on admission has suspected infection, and one in six has sepsis. qSOFA also has low sensitivity for identifying suspected infection and sepsis, and its prognostic significance is not specific to infection. More sensitive and specific tools for sepsis screening and risk stratification are needed.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Chest Physicians. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; infection; organ function/dysfunction; qSOFA; sepsis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30978329      PMCID: PMC6859245          DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.03.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  36 in total

1.  Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data.

Authors:  Danielle A Southern; Hude Quan; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care.

Authors:  D C Angus; W T Linde-Zwirble; J Lidicker; G Clermont; J Carcillo; M R Pinsky
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Authors:  Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Christopher Warren Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Djillali Annane; Michael Bauer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig M Coopersmith; Richard S Hotchkiss; Mitchell M Levy; John C Marshall; Greg S Martin; Steven M Opal; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Tom van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Comparison of QSOFA score and SIRS criteria as screening mechanisms for emergency department sepsis.

Authors:  Samir Haydar; Matthew Spanier; Patricia Weems; Samantha Wood; Tania Strout
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 2.469

5.  New Sepsis Criteria: A Change We Should Not Make.

Authors:  Steven Q Simpson
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  qSOFA as predictor of mortality and prolonged ICU admission in Emergency Department patients with suspected infection.

Authors:  Emmanuel Canet; David McD Taylor; Richard Khor; Vivek Krishnan; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.425

7.  Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Eamon P Raith; Andrew A Udy; Michael Bailey; Steven McGloughlin; Christopher MacIsaac; Rinaldo Bellomo; David V Pilcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Quick SOFA Scores Predict Mortality in Adult Emergency Department Patients With and Without Suspected Infection.

Authors:  Adam J Singer; Jennifer Ng; Henry C Thode; Rory Spiegel; Scott Weingart
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  qSOFA should replace SIRS as the screening tool for sepsis.

Authors:  Stefano Franchini; Andrea Duca
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Challenges and Opportunities for Emergency Department Sepsis Screening at Triage.

Authors:  Michael R Filbin; Jill E Thorsen; James Lynch; Trent D Gillingham; Corey L Pasakarnis; Roberta Capp; Nathan I Shapiro; Theodore Mooncai; Peter C Hou; Thomas Heldt; Andrew T Reisner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  8 in total

1.  Clinical applications of machine learning in the survival prediction and classification of sepsis: coagulation and heparin usage matter.

Authors:  Fei Guo; Xishun Zhu; Zhiheng Wu; Li Zhu; Jianhua Wu; Fan Zhang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 8.440

2.  Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Flavia R Machado; Alexandre B Cavalcanti; Mariana B Monteiro; Juliana L Sousa; Aline Bossa; Antonio T Bafi; Felipe Dal-Pizzol; Flavio G R Freitas; Thiago Lisboa; Glauco A Westphal; Andre M Japiassu; Luciano C P Azevedo
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Monocyte distribution width as part of a broad pragmatic sepsis screen in the emergency department.

Authors:  Alexandra Malinovska; Jeremiah S Hinson; Oluwakemi Badaki-Makun; Benjamin Hernried; Aria Smith; Arnaud Debraine; Matthew Toerper; Richard E Rothman; Thomas Kickler; Scott Levin
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-02-28

4.  Positioning the role of qSOFA for screening and prognostication in critically ill medical and surgical patients with suspected sepsis.

Authors:  F Paruk
Journal:  Afr J Thorac Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-12-31

Review 5.  The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: research priorities for the administration, epidemiology, scoring and identification of sepsis.

Authors:  Mark E Nunnally; Ricard Ferrer; Greg S Martin; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Flavia R Machado; Daniel De Backer; Craig M Coopersmith; Clifford S Deutschman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2021-07-02

6.  Monocyte distribution width (MDW) performance as an early sepsis indicator in the emergency department: comparison with CRP and procalcitonin in a multicenter international European prospective study.

Authors:  Pierre Hausfater; Neus Robert Boter; Cristian Morales Indiano; Marta Cancella de Abreu; Adria Mendoza Marin; Julie Pernet; Dolores Quesada; Iris Castro; Diana Careaga; Michel Arock; Liliana Tejidor; Laetitia Velly
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Identifying the Sickest During Triage: Using Point-of-Care Severity Scores to Predict Prognosis in Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Sepsis.

Authors:  Priya A Prasad; Margaret C Fang; Sandra P Martinez; Kathleen D Liu; Kirsten N Kangelaris
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.899

8.  Monocyte distribution width enhances early sepsis detection in the emergency department beyond SIRS and qSOFA.

Authors:  Elliott D Crouser; Joseph E Parrillo; Greg S Martin; David T Huang; Pierre Hausfater; Ilya Grigorov; Diana Careaga; Tiffany Osborn; Mohamad Hasan; Liliana Tejidor
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2020-05-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.