AIMS: Life expectancy in Marfan syndrome patients has improved thanks to the early detection of aortic dilation and prophylactic aortic root surgery. Current international clinical guidelines support the use of aortic root diameter as a predictor of complications. However, other imaging markers are needed to improve risk stratification. This study aim to ascertain whether proximal aorta longitudinal and circumferential strain and distensibility assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) predict the aortic root dilation rate and aortic events in Marfan syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen Marfan patients with no previous aortic dissection, cardiac/aortic surgery, or moderate/severe aortic regurgitation were prospectively included in a multicentre protocol of clinical and imaging follow-up. At baseline, CMR was performed and proximal aorta longitudinal strain and ascending aorta circumferential strain and distensibility were obtained. During follow-up (85.7 [75.0-93.2] months), the annual growth rate of aortic root diameter was 0.62 ± 0.65 mm/year. Fifteen patients underwent elective surgical aortic root replacement and four presented aortic dissection. Once corrected for baseline clinical and demographic characteristics and aortic root diameter, proximal aorta longitudinal strain, but not circumferential strain and distensibility, was an independent predictor of the aortic root diameter growth rate (P = 0.001, P = 0.823, and P = 0.997, respectively), z-score growth rate (P = 0.013, P = 0.672, and P = 0.680, respectively), and aortic events (P = 0.023, P = 0.096, and P = 0.237, respectively). CONCLUSION: Proximal aorta longitudinal strain is independently related to the aortic root dilation rate and aortic events in addition to aortic root diameter, clinical risk factors, and demographic characteristics in Marfan syndrome patients. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: Life expectancy in Marfan syndromepatients has improved thanks to the early detection of aortic dilation and prophylactic aortic root surgery. Current international clinical guidelines support the use of aortic root diameter as a predictor of complications. However, other imaging markers are needed to improve risk stratification. This study aim to ascertain whether proximal aorta longitudinal and circumferential strain and distensibility assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) predict the aortic root dilation rate and aortic events in Marfan syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen Marfan patients with no previous aortic dissection, cardiac/aortic surgery, or moderate/severe aortic regurgitation were prospectively included in a multicentre protocol of clinical and imaging follow-up. At baseline, CMR was performed and proximal aorta longitudinal strain and ascending aorta circumferential strain and distensibility were obtained. During follow-up (85.7 [75.0-93.2] months), the annual growth rate of aortic root diameter was 0.62 ± 0.65 mm/year. Fifteen patients underwent elective surgical aortic root replacement and four presented aortic dissection. Once corrected for baseline clinical and demographic characteristics and aortic root diameter, proximal aorta longitudinal strain, but not circumferential strain and distensibility, was an independent predictor of the aortic root diameter growth rate (P = 0.001, P = 0.823, and P = 0.997, respectively), z-score growth rate (P = 0.013, P = 0.672, and P = 0.680, respectively), and aortic events (P = 0.023, P = 0.096, and P = 0.237, respectively). CONCLUSION: Proximal aorta longitudinal strain is independently related to the aortic root dilation rate and aortic events in addition to aortic root diameter, clinical risk factors, and demographic characteristics in Marfan syndromepatients. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Zoltán Szabolcs; Kálmán Benke; Roland Stengl; Bence Ágg; Miklós Pólos; Gábor Mátyás; Gábor Szabó; Béla Merkely; Tamás Radovits Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2021-05-31 Impact factor: 4.123
Authors: Dianna M Milewicz; Alan C Braverman; Julie De Backer; Shaine A Morris; Catherine Boileau; Irene H Maumenee; Guillaume Jondeau; Arturo Evangelista; Reed E Pyeritz Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2021-09-02 Impact factor: 65.038
Authors: A Guala; G Teixido-Tura; L Dux-Santoy; C Granato; A Ruiz-Muñoz; F Valente; L Galian-Gay; L Gutiérrez; T González-Alujas; K M Johnson; O Wieben; A Sao Avilés; A Evangelista; J Rodriguez-Palomares Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2019-10-14 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Tarmo Korpela; S Petteri Kauhanen; Elina Kariniemi; Petri Saari; Timo Liimatainen; Pekka Jaakkola; Ritva Vanninen; Marja Hedman Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: M J P van Hout; J F Juffermans; H J Lamb; E S J Kröner; P J van den Boogaard; M J Schalij; I A Dekkers; A J Scholte; J J Westenberg Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Date: 2021-12-13
Authors: Alexander J Fletcher; Maaz B J Syed; Timothy J Aitman; David E Newby; Niki L Walker Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Julius Matthias Weinrich; Alexander Lenz; Gerhard Schön; Cyrus Behzadi; Isabel Molwitz; Frank Oliver Henes; Bjoern Philip Schoennagel; Gerhard Adam; Yskert von Kodolitsch; Peter Bannas Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 3.240