Literature DB >> 3097703

Specific disruption of spatial behaviour in rats by central muscarinic receptor blockade.

P Willner, D Wise, T Ellis.   

Abstract

Three groups of rats were required to locate a single water bottle from an octagonal array of eight otherwise empty bottles. For one group (place navigation) the goal bottle remained in the same place from trial to trial; for a second group (cue navigation) the position of the goal bottle was cued by a black card over the nozzle; for the third group the goal bottle was uncued and moved randomly from trial to trial. Place and cue groups improved more than controls on all measures of performance. Scopolamine (0.2 mg/kg) substantially impaired performance in the place group, but had no effect on either of the other groups; the peripherally acting anticholinergic drug meth-scopolamine (0.2 mg/kg) had no effect in any group. In a second experiment, using food rewards, scopolamine caused a dose-dependent impairment of place navigation at doses from 0.025 to 0.4 mg/kg; 0.4 mg/kg also impaired cue navigation, but at this dose behaviour was visibly abnormal. In both experiments, scopolamine primarily affected speed of performance rather than accuracy. Olfactory cues were shown not to contribute to performance in either group. The results implicate central cholinergic transmission in the processing of visuo-spatial information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3097703     DOI: 10.1007/bf00181247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  28 in total

1.  Spatial memory and hippocampal function.

Authors:  D S Olton; B C Papas
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Selective hippocampal lesions: differential effects on performance by rats of a spatial task with preoperative versus postoperative training.

Authors:  L E Jarrard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1978-12

3.  Selective loss of central cholinergic neurons in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  P Davies; A J Maloney
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-12-25       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Neuroanatomical bases of spatial memory.

Authors:  J T Becker; J A Walker; D S Olton
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1980-11-03       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Hippocampus: cognitive map or working memory?

Authors:  L Nadel; L MacDonald
Journal:  Behav Neural Biol       Date:  1980-07

6.  Scopolamine does not disrupt spatial working memory in rats.

Authors:  P R Godding; J R Rush; W W Beatty
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Residual learning capability in organic amnesia.

Authors:  A J Parkin
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Effects of scopolamine, pentobarbital, and amphetamine on radial arm maze performance in the rat.

Authors:  D A Eckerman; W A Gordon; J D Edwards; R C MacPhail; M I Gage
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat.

Authors:  R Morris
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Atropine stereotypy as a behavioral trap: a movement subsystem and electroencephalographic analysis.

Authors:  T Schallert; M De Ryck; P Teitelbaum
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1980-02
View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of intra-hippocampal scopolamine injections in a repeated spatial acquisition task in the rat.

Authors:  A Blokland; W Honig; W G Raaijmakers
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Blockade of spatial learning by the M1 muscarinic antagonist pirenzepine.

Authors:  J J Hagan; J H Jansen; C L Broekkamp
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.