OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to assess the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET-CT for large vessel involvement in patients with suspected giant cells arteritis (GCA) and a negative temporal artery biopsy (TAB). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in a cohort of patients with suspected GCA and negative TAB who underwent an 18F-FDG PET-CT. Ten vascular segments were studied using a visual score and a semi-quantitative method based on SUVmax ratio with respect to liver uptake. The diagnosis of GCA was established during a mean follow-up of 42 months, based on the presence of clinical symptoms, laboratory results, and imaging data compatible with GCA, good response to corticosteroid therapy, and no differential diagnosis after a follow-up of at least 18 months. RESULTS: We included 63 patients (30 men and 33 women, aged 67 ± 12 years). 18F-FDG PET-CT showed large vessel involvement in 22 patients, 14 of whom were finally diagnosed with GCA. Forty-one patients were 18F-FDG PET-CT negative, 9 of whom were finally diagnosed with GCA. Overall, 18F-FDG uptake by large vessel yielded 61% sensitivity, 80% specificity, 64% positive predictive value, 78% negative predictive value, and 73% diagnostic accuracy. A significant number of patients were treated by corticosteroids before 18F-FDG PET-CT. However, corticosteroid therapy did not impact significantly the diagnostic performance, although there was a trend to a lower sensitivity in patients receiving corticosteroid therapy for more than 3 days. CONCLUSIONS: 18F-FDG PET-CT is a useful imaging technique to assess large vessel involvement in patients with suspected GCA and negative TAB.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to assess the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET-CT for large vessel involvement in patients with suspected giant cells arteritis (GCA) and a negative temporal artery biopsy (TAB). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in a cohort of patients with suspected GCA and negative TAB who underwent an 18F-FDG PET-CT. Ten vascular segments were studied using a visual score and a semi-quantitative method based on SUVmax ratio with respect to liver uptake. The diagnosis of GCA was established during a mean follow-up of 42 months, based on the presence of clinical symptoms, laboratory results, and imaging data compatible with GCA, good response to corticosteroid therapy, and no differential diagnosis after a follow-up of at least 18 months. RESULTS: We included 63 patients (30 men and 33 women, aged 67 ± 12 years). 18F-FDG PET-CT showed large vessel involvement in 22 patients, 14 of whom were finally diagnosed with GCA. Forty-one patients were 18F-FDG PET-CT negative, 9 of whom were finally diagnosed with GCA. Overall, 18F-FDG uptake by large vessel yielded 61% sensitivity, 80% specificity, 64% positive predictive value, 78% negative predictive value, and 73% diagnostic accuracy. A significant number of patients were treated by corticosteroids before 18F-FDG PET-CT. However, corticosteroid therapy did not impact significantly the diagnostic performance, although there was a trend to a lower sensitivity in patients receiving corticosteroid therapy for more than 3 days. CONCLUSIONS:18F-FDG PET-CT is a useful imaging technique to assess large vessel involvement in patients with suspected GCA and negative TAB.
Authors: Idil Esen; William F Jiemy; Yannick van Sleen; Johan Bijzet; Daniel M de Jong; Pieter H Nienhuis; Riemer H J A Slart; Peter Heeringa; Annemieke M H Boots; Elisabeth Brouwer Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2022-07-06 Impact factor: 7.046
Authors: Kornelis S M van der Geest; Maria Sandovici; Elisabeth Brouwer; Sarah L Mackie Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 21.873