Literature DB >> 30976908

Population pharmacokinetics of palonosetron and model-based assessment of dosing strategies.

Seongheon Lee1, Injae Kim2, Taehee Pyeon1, Sooeun Lee1, Jia Song1, Jeeyun Rhee1, Seongwook Jeong3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Palonosetron is the most recent 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, and its fixed dose of 0.075 mg is indicated for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. This study aimed to examine whether fixed dosing is more appropriate than body size-based dosing through the development of a population pharmacokinetic model and model-based simulations.
METHODS: Fifty-one adult patients undergoing general anesthesia received single intravenous palonosetron administrations 30 min before the end of surgery. Palonosetron concentrations were measured in blood samples collected at various timepoints within 48 h. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by non-linear mixed-effects modeling, and the area under the curves (AUCs) for fixed dosing and body size-based dosing were simulated.
RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of palonosetron were best described by the three-compartment model, and lean body weight (LBW) was the most significant covariate for all pharmacokinetic parameters. In a patient with LBW of 40 kg, typical clearance and central volume of distribution were 0.102 L/min and 6.98 L, respectively. In simulations, the overall interindividual variability in AUC (0, 48 h) of fixed dosing was not much higher than that of body size-based dosing. In subgroup analysis, the AUCs (0, 48 h) of fixed dosing were considerably lower in the high-weight subgroup and higher in the low-weight subgroup than the median-weight subgroup. In contrast, LBW-based dosing showed similar AUC distributions among the three subgroups.
CONCLUSION: LBW-based dosing might be suitable for high-weight patients to avoid possible underdosing. Nevertheless, the current fixed dosing of palonosetron is acceptable for adult patients with normal weight.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PONV; Palonosetron; Pharmacokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30976908     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-019-02641-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  35 in total

1.  Assessment of actual significance levels for covariate effects in NONMEM.

Authors:  U Wählby; E N Jonsson; M O Karlsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  The origin of the "ideal" body weight equations.

Authors:  M P Pai; F P Paloucek
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 3.  Effects of obesity on pharmacokinetics implications for drug therapy.

Authors:  G Cheymol
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Model appropriateness and population pharmacokinetic modeling.

Authors:  Ene I Ette; Paul J Williams; Yong Ho Kim; James R Lane; Mei-Jen Liu; Edmund V Capparelli
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.126

5.  Bootstrap approach for constructing confidence intervals for population pharmacokinetic parameters. I: A use of bootstrap standard error.

Authors:  A Yafune; M Ishiguro
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Perl-speaks-NONMEM (PsN)--a Perl module for NONMEM related programming.

Authors:  Lars Lindbom; Jakob Ribbing; E Niclas Jonsson
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Pharmacokinetic and safety evaluation of palonosetron, a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, in U.S. and Japanese healthy subjects.

Authors:  Randall Stoltz; Jong-Chol Cyong; Ajit Shah; Simona Parisi
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.126

8.  A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Christian C Apfel; Kari Korttila; Mona Abdalla; Heinz Kerger; Alparslan Turan; Ina Vedder; Carmen Zernak; Klaus Danner; Ritva Jokela; Stuart J Pocock; Stefan Trenkler; Markus Kredel; Andreas Biedler; Daniel I Sessler; Norbert Roewer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of palonosetron in patients receiving highly emetogenic cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a dose-ranging clinical study.

Authors:  P Eisenberg; F R MacKintosh; P Ritch; P A Cornett; A Macciocchi
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  A randomized comparison of a multimodal management strategy versus combination antiemetics for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Ashraf S Habib; William D White; Steve Eubanks; Theodore N Pappas; Tong J Gan
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of Palonosetron on Physical Symptoms of Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ruichao Chu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 2.238

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.