| Literature DB >> 30976670 |
Mabozou Kpemissi1,2,3, Kwashie Eklu-Gadegbeku1, Veeresh P Veerapur3, Adrian-Valentin Potârniche2, Kodjo Adi1, S Vijayakumar3, Siddalingesh M Banakar4, N V Thimmaiah4, Kossi Metowogo1, Kodjo Aklikokou1.
Abstract
Management of chronic renal failure is exceedingly expensive. Despite of encouraging experimental outcomes, there is a lack of potent nephroprotective drugable molecules in a clinics or market. To develop a nephroprotective phytomedicine, the present study was designed to do a literature survey on reported phytochemical and biological analysis of Combretum micranthum and to carry out chemoprofiling, in-vitro antioxidant and ex-vivo nephroprotective capacity of the title plant. The phytochemical and biological activity survey of C. micranthum has reveals the presence of many bioactive compounds such as flavonoids, terpenoids, steroids and alkaloids with many biological activities. Phytochemical investigation re-confirmed the presence of these compounds. Hydroalcoholic extract of C. micranthum (CM extract) showed a strong antioxidant activity by scavenging AAPH, DPPH, nitric oxide, hydrogen peroxide and chelating metal ions. CM extract exhibited significant (P < 0.001) dose dependent inhibition of ferric chloride-ascorbic acid induced lipid peroxidation. Diabetic nephropathy is a serious and common complication leading to end stage renal disease. Therefore, in the present study, glucose-induced toxicity was also studied in human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293) as an in vitro model for diabetic nephropathy. The results showed that exposure of cells to high glucose (100 mM) for 72 h significantly reduced the cell viability resulting in morphological changes such as cell shrinkage, rounded cell shape and cytoplasmic vacuolation. Treatment with CM extract at 10 and 25 μg/mL resulted in significant improvement in cell viability from 10 to 23% compared to the high glucose control. This study demonstrated the potential antioxidant and nephroprotective properties of C. micranthum, justifying its traditional use in the treatment of various diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Cell biology; Developmental biology; Physiology; Stem cell research; systems biology
Year: 2019 PMID: 30976670 PMCID: PMC6441829 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01365
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Reported phytochemical compounds of Combretum micranthum.
| Compound name | Classes | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Gallic acid | [ | |
| Combretine | ||
| Rutin trihydrate | ||
| Benzoic acid | ||
| (+)-Catechin | [ | |
| Vitexin | [ | |
| Isovitexin | [ | |
| Orientin | [ | |
| Homoorientin | [ | |
| Myricetin-3-O-glycoside | ||
| (-)-Epigallocatechin: | ||
| (-)-Epicatechin | ||
| (-)-3′,4′,5′,5,7-pentahydroxyf lavan | ||
| (-)-3′,4′,5,7-tetrahydroxyf lavan | ||
| 2″-O-galloylvitexin | ||
| 2″-O-galloylisovitexin | ||
| 2″-O-galloylorientin | ||
| 2″-O-galloylhomoorientin | ||
| α-Tocopherol | [ | |
| α -Tocopherol derivative | [ | |
| Monoterpene | ||
| Lupeol | ||
| α -amyrin | [ | |
| Palmitic acid | ||
| Oleic acid | ||
| Linolenic acid | ||
| β-Sitosterol | ||
| Sorbitol | ||
| Inositol | ||
| β-sitosterol | ||
| Choline | ||
| Kinkéloid A1 | ||
| Kinkéloid A2 | ||
| Kinkéloid B1 | ||
| Kinkéloid B2 | ||
| Kinkéloid C1 | ||
| Kinkéloid C2 | ||
| Kinkéloid D1 | ||
| Kinkéloid D2 | ||
| Botulin | ||
| Stachydrine | ||
| 4-Hydroxyproline betaine | [ | |
| Betaine |
Reported biological activities of Combretum micranthum.
| Biological activity | Reference |
|---|---|
| Antimalarial | [ |
| Antiviral | [ |
| anti-inflammatory | [ |
| wound healing | |
| Antioxidant | [ |
| antibacterial | [ |
| Neuroprotective | [ |
| Antihyperglycaemic | [ |
| Anti-diabetic | [ |
| Antiradical | |
| Antifungal | |
| Anti-trypanosomal | |
| Anti-Ebola | |
| Anti-Obesity | [ |
Total phenols, flavonoids and tannins content of Combretum micranthum extract.
| Tests | Amount in extract |
|---|---|
| Total phenols (mg gallic acid/100 g of extract) | 154.27 ± 3.31 |
| Flavonoids (mg Rutin/100 g of extract) | 333.23 ± 5.02 |
| Tannins (mg gallic acid/100 g of extract) | 21.88 ± 0.01 |
Fig. 1FT-IR spectra of Combretum micranthum extract (CM).
In vitro study-state antioxidant activities of Combretum micranthum extract (CM) against DPPH, H2O2, NO, AAPH radicals, Metal chelating and reducing power.
| Descriptions (5–200 μg/mL) | IC50 (μg/mL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH radical | Metal chelating activity | Reducing power | H2O2 scavenging | NO scavenging | AAPH scavenging | |
| Extract (CM) | 2.49 ± 0.53 | 10.60 ± 0.22 | 2.50 ± 0.47 | 10.80 ± 0.42 | 36.48 ± 0.33 | 57.00 ± 0.13 |
| Quercetin | 5.80 ± 0.42 | – | 2.60 ± 0.38 | 10.00 ± 0.63 | 9.80 ± 0.41 | 25.30 ± 0.18 |
| Ascorbic Acid | 0.02 ± 0.33 | – | 2.40 ± 0.54 | 44.20 ± 0.13 | 10.41 ± 0.23 | 50.70 ± 0.26 |
| EDTA | – | 10.00 ± 0.34 | – | – | – | – |
| BHT | – | – | – | 2.50 ± 0.16 | – | |
IC50 (μg/mL) represented as mean ± SEM, n = 3.
Fig. 2Effects of Combretum micranthum extract (CM) on FeCl2-ascorbic acid-induced lipid peroxidation on kidney homogenate. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5). one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons test. Compared to FeCl2-ascorbic acid group: ***P < 0.001; Compared to Quercetin group: ###P < 0.001.
Fig. 3Effect of various concentration of Combretum micranthum extract (CM) on cell viability in HEK-293 cells.
Fig. 4Microsocpic image of HEK-293 cells treated with glucose alone or in combination of different concentration of Combretum micranthum extract (CM).
Effect of Combretum micranthum extract (CM) on Glucose induced toxicity in HEK-293 cells.
| Treatment | Concentration | % Cell Viability | Improvement of % Cell Viability | EC50 (μg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control Glucose (mM) | 25 | 100 ± 0.0 | – | – |
| Glucose (mM) | 100 | 42 ± 2.6### | – | – |
| CM Extract (μg/mL) with Glucose (100 μM) | 5 | 52 ± 1.5 | 10 | 140.7 |
| 10 | 62 ± 7.6* | 20 | ||
| 25 | 65 ± 3.5* | 23 | ||
| 50 | 60 ± 6.4 | 18 | ||
| 100 | 52 ± 8.7 | 10 | ||
| 200 | 40 ± 5.7 | -2 |
Percentage cell viability (%) represented as, Mean ± SEM, n = 3.
###P < 0.001, One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test compared with Control.
*P < 0.05, One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test compared with cisplatin treated.