| Literature DB >> 30976463 |
Thitirut Assawamongkholsiri1, Alissara Reungsang2,3, Sureewan Sittijunda4.
Abstract
Photo-hydrogen and lipid production from individual synthetic volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and sugar manufacturing wastewater (SMW) by Rhodobacter sp. KKU-PS1 with sodium glutamate or Aji-L (i.e., waste from the process of crystallizing monosodium glutamate) as a nitrogen source was investigated. Using individual synthetic VFAs, the maximum hydrogen production was achieved with Aji-L as a nitrogen source rather than sodium glutamate. The maximum hydrogen production was 1,727, 754 and 1,353 mL H2/L, respectively, using 25 mM of lactate, 40 mM of acetate and 15mM of butyrate as substrates. Under these conditions, lipid was produced in the range of 10.6-16.9% (w/w). Subsequently, photo-hydrogen and lipid production from SMW using Aji-L as nitrogen source was conducted. Maximal hydrogen production and hydrogen yields of 1,672 mL H2/L and 1.92 mol H2/mol substrate, respectively, were obtained. Additionally, lipid content and lipid production of 21.3% (w/w) and 475 mg lipid/L were achieved. The analysis of the lipid and fatty acid components revealed that triacyglycerol (TAG) and C18:1 methyl ester were the main lipid and fatty acid components, respectively, found in Rhodobacter sp. KKU-PS1 cells.Entities:
Keywords: Bio-hydrogen; Microbial lipid; Photo fermentation; Purple non-sulfur photosynthetic bacteria; Volatile fatty acids
Year: 2019 PMID: 30976463 PMCID: PMC6451836 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6653
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Experimental set up.
Figure 2Cumulative hydrogen production using different carbon sources at various concentrations with glutamate or Aji-L as nitrogen sources.
(A) lactate (HLa) with glutamate, (B) acetate (HAc) with glutamate, (C) butyrate (Hbu) with glutamate (D) lactate (HLa) with Aji-L, (E) acetate (HAc)with Aji-L, and (F) butyrate (Hbu) with Aji-L.
Hmax, R, HY, SCE, substrate degradation, biomass concentration and final pH for single carbon sources at various concentrations using glutamate or Aji-L as a nitrogen source by Rhodobacter sp. KKU-PS1.
| Nitrogen source | Carbon source | Concentration (mM) | Hmax | Rm (mL H2/L.h) | HY | SCE (%) | Substrate degradation (%) | Biomass concentration (gCDW/L) | Biomass production (gCDW/L) | Final pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 151a | 2.1 | 3.07fgh | 51.2 | 100 | 0.66 | 0.43 | 7.1 | ||
| 15 | 1,033gh | 3.14 | 3.55ghi | 59.2 | 100 | 0.76 | 0.53 | 7.11 | ||
| Lactate | 20 | 1,054hi | 3.49 | 2.77efg | 46.1 | 100 | 0.82 | 0.59 | 7.11 | |
| 25 | 1,797k | 3.78 | 3.68ghij | 61.3 | 100 | 0.82 | 0.59 | 7.14 | ||
| 30 | 1,897k | 3.56 | 3.32ghi | 55.4 | 100 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 7.18 | ||
| 10 | 306abcd | 3.35 | 1.99cde | 49.7 | 100 | 0.58 | 0.35 | 7.15 | ||
| Sodium glutamate | Acetate | 20 | 590ef | 3.22 | 1.81bcd | 45.3 | 100 | 0.90 | 0.67 | 7.23 |
| 30 | 775fg | 2.28 | 1.22abc | 30.4 | 100 | 1.51 | 1.28 | 7.73 | ||
| 40 | 795gh | 2.49 | 1.20abc | 30 | 100 | 1.57 | 1.34 | 7.76 | ||
| Butyrate | 5 | 532ef | 5.01 | 6.05l | 60.5 | 100 | 0.77 | 0.54 | 7.21 | |
| 15 | 734g | 3.27 | 4.02ijk | 40.2 | 60.5 | 0.80 | 0.57 | 7.17 | ||
| 30 | 437de | 3.04 | 3.35ghi | 32.6 | 29.9 | 0.83 | 0.60 | 7.23 | ||
| 45 | 200ab | 2.92 | 1.21abc | 12.1 | 19.1 | 0.82 | 0.59 | 7.25 | ||
| 60 | 240abc | 2.04 | 1.48abc | 14.7 | 15 | 0.86 | 0.63 | 7.3 | ||
| 5 | 150a | 2.08 | 3.27fghi | 54.4 | 100 | 0.72 | 0.49 | 7.16 | ||
| 15 | 1,117i | 5.43 | 3.70ghij | 61.7 | 100 | 0.79 | 0.56 | 7.21 | ||
| Lactate | 20 | 1,466j | 4.91 | 3.71hij | 61.8 | 100 | 0.84 | 0.61 | 7.16 | |
| 25 | 1,727k | 4.95 | 3.44ghi | 57.3 | 100 | 0.95 | 0.72 | 7.09 | ||
| 30 | 1,978k | 4.14 | 3.31ghi | 55.2 | 100 | 1.01 | 0.78 | 7.12 | ||
| Waste from the process of glutamate (Aji-L) | Acetate | 10 | 236abc | 3.99 | 1.49abcd | 37.3 | 100 | 0.84 | 0.61 | 7.24 |
| 20 | 486de | 3.8 | 1.40abc | 35.1 | 100 | 1.09 | 0.86 | 7.26 | ||
| 30 | 541ef | 3.01 | 1.04ab | 26 | 100 | 1.55 | 1.32 | 7.66 | ||
| 40 | 754g | 3.12 | 1.09abc | 27.3 | 100 | 1.91 | 1.68 | 7.88 | ||
| Butyrate | 5 | 434cde | 5.7 | 4.81k | 48.1 | 100 | 0.86 | 0.63 | 7.27 | |
| 15 | 1,353j | 3.98 | 4.57jk | 45.7 | 97.1 | 1.11 | 0.88 | 7.14 | ||
| 30 | 502ef | 2.38 | 2.37def | 23.7 | 35 | 1.00 | 0.77 | 7.19 | ||
| 45 | 339bcde | 2.29 | 2.14abc | 21.4 | 17.5 | 0.95 | 0.72 | 7.05 | ||
| 60 | 187ab | 1.79 | 1.17a | 11.7 | 13.1 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 7.1 |
Notes.
Difference letters indicated the differences among individual VFAs concentrations and nitrogen sources in column by Scheffe test (P <0.05).
maximum cumulative hydrogen production
maximum hydrogen production rate
hydrogen yield
substrate conversion efficiency
Figure 3Image of Rhodobacter sp. KKU-PS1 in the fermentation broth (A) the live cells in 15 mM butyrate as a carbon source (B) cell death resulted sedimentation in the fermentation broth containing a high butyrate concentration (30–75 mM).
Lipid content, lipid production and fatty acid distribution for individual synthetic VFAs under optimal conditions with SMW as carbon sources by Rhodobacter sp. KKU-PS1.
| Carbon source | Nitrogen source | Lipid content (%, w/w) | Lipid production (mg lipid/L) | Yield (mg lipid/gCDW) | Fatty acid distribution (% of total fatty acid) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C12:0 | C14:0 | C15:0 | C16:0 | C16:1 | C17:0 | C18:0 | C18:1 | C:18:2 | Other | |||||
| 25 mM lactate | Glutamate | 10.6 | 87 | 106.10 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 9.5 | 3.9 | 0.7 | 28.7 | 52.9 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 25 mM lactate | Aji-L | 12.7 | 121 | 127.37 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 7.9 | 4.1 | 0.7 | 29.9 | 54.4 | 0.5 | 1.3 |
| 40 mM acetate | Glutamate | 14.7 | 231 | 147.13 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 8.9 | 3.8 | 0.6 | 26.1 | 54.8 | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| 40 mM acetate | Aji-L | 16.9 | 323 | 169.11 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 8.8 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 25.6 | 56.1 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
| 15 mM butyrate | Glutamate | 12.2 | 98 | 122.50 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 9.0 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 28.2 | 51.6 | 1.7 | 2.3 |
| 15 mM butyrate | Aji-L | 14.9 | 165 | 148.65 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 11.4 | 3.4 | 1.5 | 26.5 | 51 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| SMW | Aji-L | 21.3 | 475 | 213.00 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 14 | 3.1 | 5.7 | 26.7 | 43.2 | 1.3 | 2.5 |
Notes.
lauric acid
myristic acid
pentadecylic acid
palmitic acid
palmitoleic acid
stearic acid
octadecanoic acid
linoleic acid
The mixtures of fatty acids, i.e., C19:0 (nonadecylic acid), C20:0 (arachidic acid), C22:0 (behenic acid) and C23:0 (tricosylic acid)
Figure 4Thin-layer chromatogram of non-polar lipid of Rhodobacter sp. KKU-PS1.
The reference standards were monoacylglycerols (MAG), diacylglycerols (DAG), triacylglycerols (TAG), cholesteryl linoleate (CL), free fatty acids (FFA) and phospholipids (PL). The lipid band of samples at various conditions were 25 mM lactate with glutamate (25 HLaG), 40 mM acetate with glutamate (40 HAcG), 15 mM butyrate with glutamate (15 HBuG), 25 mM lactate with Aji-L (25 HLaA), 40 mM acetate with Aji-L (40 HAcA), 15 mM butyrate with Aji-L (15 HBuA) and sugar manufacturing wastewater (SMW) with AjiL, respectively.
Photo-hydrogen production using SMW with Aji-L as a nitrogen source by Rhodobacter sp. KKU-PS1.
| Carbon source | Hmax (mL H2/L) | Rm (mL H2/L h) | HY(mol H2/ mol substrate) | SCE (%) | Substrate degradation (%) | Biomass concentration (gCDW/L) | Final pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMW | 1,672 ± 99 | 4.62 ± 0.08 | 1.92 | 7 | 65.08 ± 0.76 | 2.23 ± 0.11 | 7.48 ± 0.01 |
Notes.
maximum cumulative hydrogen production
maximum hydrogen production rate
hydrogen yield
Figure 5Cumulative hydrogen production from sugar manufacturing wastewater (SMW) with AjiL as a nitrogen source by Rhodobacter sp. KKU-PS1.
Comparison of photo-hydrogen production using various organic wastewaters as carbon sources by Rhodobacter species.
| Feedstock | Substrate concentrations | Microorganism | Operation mode | Light intensity/ type of lamps | Hydrogen production (mL H2/L) | Hydrogen production rate (mL H2/L.h) | Specific hydrogen production rate (mL H2/g CDW h) | Biomass concentration (gCDW/L) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diluted dairy wastewater | 40% of waste (18.5 gCOD/L) | Batch fermentation | 9 Klux/ mercury-tungsten lamp | 3230 | 49 | 136.11 | 2.56 | ||
| Diluted brewery wastewater | 10% of waste (20.2 gCOD/L) | Batch fermentation | 9 Klux/ mercury-tungsten lamp | 1640 | 61 | 169.44 | 2.28 | ||
| Diluted dark fermentation effluent of acid hydrolyed wheat starch | 2 g/L of TVFA | Periodic feeding | 5 Klux/ halogen lamps | nd | 14.16a | 8.54 | 3.64 | ||
| Diluted dark fermentation effluent of ground wheat starch | 2 g/L of TVFA | Intermittent feeding and effluent removal | 5 Klux/ fluorescent lamp | nd | 1.13 | 3.21 | 0.35 | ||
| Diluted dark fermentation effluent of ground wheat | 2.68 g/L of TVFA | Batch fermentation | 5.5 Klux/ fluorescent lamp | 191 | 1.06 | 13.80 | nd | ||
| Diluted dark fermentation effluent of ground wheat | 2.34 g/L of TVFA | Batch fermentation | 5.5 Klux/ fluorescent lamps | 126 | 0.7 | 3.55 | nd | ||
| Sugar manufacturing wastewater (SMW) | 4.0 g/L of TVFA (8 gCOD/L) | Batch fermentation | 7.5 Klux/ LED lamp | 1,672 | 4.62 | 22.00 | 2.23 | This study |
Notes.
the values were calculated from the reported experiment
nd, no reported data