Literature DB >> 30976170

Ginsenoside Rf inhibits cyclooxygenase-2 induction via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma in A549 cells.

Heewon Song1, Joonwoo Park1, KeunOh Choi1, Jeonggeun Lee1, Jie Chen2, Hyun-Ju Park2, Byeung-Il Yu3, Mitsuru Iida4, Mee-Ra Rhyu5, YoungJoo Lee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ginsenoside Rf is a ginseng saponin found only in Panax ginseng that affects lipid metabolism. It also has neuroprotective and antiinflammatory properties. We previously showed that Korean Red Ginseng (KRG) inhibited the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) by hypoxia via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ). The aim of the current study was to evaluate the possibility of ginsenoside Rf as an active ingredient of KRG in the inhibition of hypoxia-induced COX-2 via PPARγ.
METHODS: The effects of ginsenoside Rf on the upregulation of COX-2 by hypoxia and its antimigration effects were evaluated in A549 cells. Docking of ginsenoside Rf was performed with the PPARγ structure using Surflex-Dock in Sybyl-X 2.1.1.
RESULTS: PPARγ protein levels and peroxisome proliferator response element promoter activities were promoted by ginsenoside Rf. Inhibition of COX-2 expression by ginsenoside Rf was blocked by the PPARγ-specific inhibitor, T0070907. The PPARγ inhibitor also blocked the ability of ginsenoside Rf to suppress cell migration under hypoxia. The docking simulation results indicate that ginsenoside Rf binds to the active site of PPARγ.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that ginsenoside Rf inhibits hypoxia induced-COX-2 expression and cellular migration, which are dependent on PPARγ activation. These results suggest that ginsenoside Rf has an antiinflammatory effect under hypoxic conditions. Moreover, docking analysis of ginsenoside Rf into the active site of PPARγ suggests that the compound binds to PPARγ in a position similar to that of known agonists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COX-2; PPARγ; ginsenoside Rf; hypoxia

Year:  2018        PMID: 30976170      PMCID: PMC6437553          DOI: 10.1016/j.jgr.2018.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ginseng Res        ISSN: 1226-8453            Impact factor:   6.060


Introduction

The Panax genus of the Araliaceae family, commonly known as ginseng, is a representative medicinal herb in Asian countries that has been used for more than 2,000 years. Its recent use is not limited to Asia but has been extended to the market of Western countries and is estimated to be worth $2,084 million including ginseng root and its processed products [1]. The global popularity of ginseng consumption indirectly supports the efficacy of ginseng and has scientifically proven its pharmacology [1], [2]. In particular, ginseng reduces inflammation, and both in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that ginseng has antiinflammatory and anticancer effects [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Saponins, known as ginsenosides, are widely regarded as the most highly bioactive compounds in ginseng [8]. Single or crude mixtures of saponins have been considered to be responsible for most of the pharmacological effects of ginseng over the years [9]. Based on their chemical structure, ginsenosides are divided into two groups: protopanaxatriol and protopanaxadiol. The protopanaxatriol group includes ginsenosides Rg1, Re, Rf, Rh1, and Rg2. Ginsenoside Rf is a steroid-like compound linked to sugars. The content of ginsenoside Rf was 0.54 ± 0.26 mg/g (Rg1 contains 2.01 ± 0.65 mg/g) in fresh ginseng and 0.78 ± 0.25 mg/g (Rg1 contains 3.34 ± 0.98 mg/g) in red ginseng [10]. The content of ginsenoside Rf in Panax ginseng is shown as follows: roots, 1.8 ± 0.1 mg/g; stems and leaves, 0.3 ± 0.1 mg/g; and fruits, 3.6 ± 1.1 mg/g [11]. Ginsenoside Rf is a ginseng saponin that is only present in Panax ginseng [1]. Although the concentration of ginsenoside Rf is low, it is an important regulator of lipid metabolism with additional neuroprotective, antinociceptive, and antiinflammatory properties [12], [13], [14], [15]. Hypoxia refers to an overall reduction in tissue oxygen, a characteristic of solid tumors, and causes cell metastasis and invasion [16]. The production of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is increased by diverse factors, such as hypertonicity, lipopolysaccharide, cytokines, and hypoxia [17], [18], [19], [20]. The upregulation of COX-2 increases the risk of metastasis of cancer cells, and the suppression of COX-2 decreases tumor formation and metastasis [21], [22]. Mammary epithelial cells contain peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), which is important for the formation of breast tumors and is associated with COX-2 [23]. According to these observations, COX-2 inhibition is important to prevent the invasion of cancer cells induced by hypoxia. PPARγ is a key regulator of adipocytes and is primarily present in adipose tissue. PPARγ is also involved in regulating inflammation by controlling COX-2 expression using the PPAR response element within the COX-2 promoter [24], [25], [26]. However, the effects of PPARγ may vary depending on the cell type, and some studies have indicated that PPARγ activates or inhibits COX-2 via PPARγ-dependent or -independent mechanisms [27], [28], [29]. We reported previously that Korean Red Ginseng (KRG) suppressed COX-2 expression under hypoxia via PPARγ [30]. In this study, we aimed to determine whether ginsenoside Rf is the active constituent of KRG leading to the inhibition of hypoxia-induced COX-2 expression via PPARγ

Materials and methods

Materials

Ginsenoside Rf was supplied by the Korea Ginseng Cooperation (Daejeon, Korea). 17-β-estradiol, dihydrotestosterone, and bicalutamide were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). T0070907 was purchased from Selleckchem (Houston, TX, USA). ICI 182,780 (ICI) was purchased from ZENECA pharmaceutical (Tocris, UK). Fetal bovine serum and penicillin/streptomycin were purchased from GIBCO Invitrogen (Grand Island, NY, USA). Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) was bought from ENZO (Enzo LifeSciences, Lausen, Switzerland). Anti-COX-2 was used from Cayman Chemical (160106), anti-β-actin was used from Sigma (A5441). Anti-sirtuin-1 (SIRT-1), anti-PPARγ, and anti-peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma coactivator-1 alpha were used from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (sc-15404, SC-7196, SC-13067).

Cell culture and hypoxic conditions

Maintenance of human lung epithelial A549 and human breast cancer MCF-7 cells as described previously [30]. AR-EcoScreen™ cells (gift from Dr, Mitsuru Iida, Hiyoshi Corporation, Japan) were derived from a Chinese Hamster Ovary cell line that is stably transformed with a plasmid containing an androgen response element (ARE) fused to a luciferase gene, and a plasmid encoding the androgen receptor (AR) cDNA sequence [31]. AR-EcoScreen™ cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified eagle medium/F-12 media containing 10% fetal bovine serum. For the hypoxic condition, A549 cells were incubated at a CO2 level of 5% with 1% O2 balanced with N2 using a hypoxic chamber (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Transfection and luciferase reporter gene assays

A549 cells were seeded at density of 3 × 104 cells/well. After 1-2 days, plasmids were transiently transfected by using polyethylenimine (Polysciences, Warrington, PA, USA). Luciferase reporter gene assay was performed as described previously [30]. Firefly luciferase reporter construct for PPAR response element (PPRE) was kindly provided from Dr. Ron Evans (The Salk Institute, San Diego California, USA). COX-2 firefly luciferase reporter was kindly provided by Dr. Hiroyasu Inoue (Nara Women's University, Nara, Japan). Estrogen response element (ERE)-Luc, a firefly luciferase reporter construct containing the three copies of vitellogenin estrogen response element, was purchased from Addgene (Cambridge, MA, USA, Addgene plasmid number 11354).

Western blot analysis

Western blotting was performed as described previously [30]. The membranes were treated with antibodies against COX-2 (1:1000), β-actin (1:5000), SIRT-1 (1:1000), and PPARγ (1:1000).

Cellular migration assays

The migration assay was performed using transwell (8.0 μm pores transwell, Corning, NY, USA) as reported previously [32]. After incubation under normoxia or hypoxia for 24 h, migrated cells were observed and counted using a light microscope.

CCK-8 assays

A549 cells were seeded at a density of 5 × 103 cells/well in a 96-well plate. After 24 h, the indicated chemicals were incubated at normoxia or hypoxia for 24 h. CCK-8 assay was performed as described previously [33].

Preparation of protein structures

Crystal structure of PPARγ (PDB ID: 2ATH) in complex with the agonist BPR1H036 (2-ethanoic acid) was downloaded from RCSB Protein Data Bank [34], [35]. The PPARγ structure was optimized for docking as follows: all water molecules were removed from the crystal structure, and the bound ligand was extracted and then prepared with the protein preparation module of the Sybyl-X 2.1.1 (Certara Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA) using default parameters.

Docking with Surflex-Dock

Ginsenoside Rf was docked into the prepared PPARγ crystal structure by using Surflex-Dock in Sybyl-X 2.1.1. The program generated the protomol in the active site of PPARγ with a threshold of 0.4 and bloat set of 1 around the embedded BPR1H036 molecule. The residues (SER289, HIS323, HIS449, and TYR473) found to interact with BPR1H036 were considered as crucial residues in the active site of PPARγ. The main setting was 50 solutions for flexible docking of the ligand, and the other parameters accepted the Surflex-Dock Geom default settings. Docking results were analyzed by using Glide program (Schrödinger LLC, NY, USA).

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed and expressed as means and standard deviations. The two-tailed, unpaired Student t test was applied using SPSS software (version 23.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Ginsenoside Rf induces PPARγ transcriptional activity and its protein expression in A549 cells

We previously showed that KRG inhibited hypoxia-induced COX-2 activation via PPARγ [32]. In search of the active constituent of KRG that inhibits hypoxia-induced COX-2, ginsenoside Rf was chosen because previous studies suggested that ginsenoside Rf may modulate PPARγ [36]. To assess the effects of ginsenoside Rf on hypoxia-induced COX-2 activation, A549 cells were pretreated with ginsenoside Rf for 1 h and exposed to hypoxic conditions for 24 h. Ginsenoside Rf increased the protein levels of SIRT-1 and PPARγ compared with hypoxia (Fig. 1A). At the same time, 10 μM of ginsenoside Rf efficiently blocked the upregulation of COX-2 transcriptional activity and protein level under hypoxia (Fig. 1A and B). Next, we wanted to examine whether ginsenoside Rf activated PPARγ luciferase reporter activity (Fig. 1C). Ginsenoside Rf significantly activated PPRE luciferase reporter activity. Ginsenoside Rf–induced PPRE luciferase gene activation was blocked by treatment with the PPARγ antagonist, T0070907, indicating that ginsenoside Rf-induced PPRE luciferase gene activation is PPARγ-specific. Cell viability was not affected at concentrations of 1–10 μΜ ginsenoside Rf for 24 h under normoxic or hypoxic conditions (Fig. 1D).
Fig. 1

Ginsenoside Rf induces PPARγ transcriptional activity and its protein expression. (A) A549 cells were treated with ginsenoside Rf at 1–10 μM for 24 h under hypoxia and analyzed by Western blot. Protein expressions were normalized to β-actin content in each sample. (B) A549 cells were transiently transfected with the COX-2-luciferase reporter gene. The following day, A549 cells were cultured in medium containing vehicle or ginsenoside Rf (10 μM) for 24 h under hypoxia, and luciferase activities were determined. (C) A549 cells were transiently transfected with the PPRE-luciferase reporter gene. The following day, A549 cells were cultured in medium containing vehicle or ginsenoside Rf (1-10 μM) or PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone (1 μM) or PPARγ antagonist T0070907 (5 μM) for 48 h, and luciferase activities were determined. (D) A549 cells were incubated with ginsenoside Rf at 1–10 μM for 24 h under normoxia or hypoxia, and CCK-8 assay was performed. All experiments were repeated at least three times. Values represent the mean ± SD (N = 3). All experiments were repeated at least three times. * represents p < 0.05, ** represents p < 0.01, p > 0.05 is indicated by “n.s.” for not significant. COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma; PPRE, PPAR response element; CCK-8, cell counting kit-8; SIRT-1, sirtuin-1; SD, standard deviation.

Ginsenoside Rf induces PPARγ transcriptional activity and its protein expression. (A) A549 cells were treated with ginsenoside Rf at 1–10 μM for 24 h under hypoxia and analyzed by Western blot. Protein expressions were normalized to β-actin content in each sample. (B) A549 cells were transiently transfected with the COX-2-luciferase reporter gene. The following day, A549 cells were cultured in medium containing vehicle or ginsenoside Rf (10 μM) for 24 h under hypoxia, and luciferase activities were determined. (C) A549 cells were transiently transfected with the PPRE-luciferase reporter gene. The following day, A549 cells were cultured in medium containing vehicle or ginsenoside Rf (1-10 μM) or PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone (1 μM) or PPARγ antagonist T0070907 (5 μM) for 48 h, and luciferase activities were determined. (D) A549 cells were incubated with ginsenoside Rf at 1–10 μM for 24 h under normoxia or hypoxia, and CCK-8 assay was performed. All experiments were repeated at least three times. Values represent the mean ± SD (N = 3). All experiments were repeated at least three times. * represents p < 0.05, ** represents p < 0.01, p > 0.05 is indicated by “n.s.” for not significant. COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma; PPRE, PPAR response element; CCK-8, cell counting kit-8; SIRT-1, sirtuin-1; SD, standard deviation.

Ginsenoside Rf inhibits hypoxia-induced COX-2 protein expression and COX-2 transcriptional activity through PPARγ in A549 cells

To determine whether PPRE activation is related to COX-2 inhibition by ginsenoside Rf, COX-2 protein levels were measured using T0070907 (Fig. 2A). The suppression of hypoxia-induced COX-2 protein expression by ginsenoside Rf was blocked by T0070907, indicating that the response involves PPARγ. To further identify the involvement of PPARγ activation, COX-2 promoter activity was measured following treatment with T0070907 (Fig. 2B). These results suggest that the suppression of hypoxia-stimulated COX-2 by ginsenoside Rf in A549 cells is dependent on PPARγ.
Fig. 2

PPARγ activation is required for the ginsenoside Rf-mediated inhibition of hypoxia-induced COX-2 expression. (A) A549 cells were pretreated with vehicle or ginsenoside Rf (10 μM) and/or T0070907 (5 μM) for 1 h before treatment with hypoxia for 24 h. Total proteins were prepared, and protein levels of COX-2 were determined by Western blot. Proteins expression were normalized to β-actin content in each sample. (B) A549 cells were transiently transfected with the COX-2 luciferase reporter gene. The following day, A549 cells were cultured in medium containing vehicle or ginsenoside Rf (10 μM) and/or PPARγ antagonist T0070907 (5 μM) for 24 h under the hypoxia, and luciferase activities were determined. Values represent the mean ± SD (N = 3). All experiments were repeated at least three times. * represents p < 0.05, ** represents p < 0.01, *** represents p < 0.001. COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma; SD, standard deviation.

PPARγ activation is required for the ginsenoside Rf-mediated inhibition of hypoxia-induced COX-2 expression. (A) A549 cells were pretreated with vehicle or ginsenoside Rf (10 μM) and/or T0070907 (5 μM) for 1 h before treatment with hypoxia for 24 h. Total proteins were prepared, and protein levels of COX-2 were determined by Western blot. Proteins expression were normalized to β-actin content in each sample. (B) A549 cells were transiently transfected with the COX-2 luciferase reporter gene. The following day, A549 cells were cultured in medium containing vehicle or ginsenoside Rf (10 μM) and/or PPARγ antagonist T0070907 (5 μM) for 24 h under the hypoxia, and luciferase activities were determined. Values represent the mean ± SD (N = 3). All experiments were repeated at least three times. * represents p < 0.05, ** represents p < 0.01, *** represents p < 0.001. COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma; SD, standard deviation.

Ginsenoside Rf repress hypoxia-induced cellular migration in A549 cells

To confirm whether ginsenoside Rf inhibits cellular migration via PPARγ, migration capability was examined using T0070907 in A549 cells. As shown in Fig. 3, ginsenoside Rf inhibited cellular migration under hypoxia. The inhibition of hypoxia-induced cellular migration by ginsenoside Rf was significantly blocked by T0070907. These results suggest that ginsenoside Rf inhibits hypoxia-induced cellular migration via PPARγ.
Fig. 3

Ginsenoside Rf inhibits hypoxia-induced cellular migration of A549 cells via PPARγ. A549 cells were pretreated with ginsenoside Rf (10 μM) and/or T0070907 (5 μM) treatment for 1 h and incubated under hypoxia for 24 h. Cells that migrated through the membranes were fixed and counted using light microscopy. Bar graph shows relative migrated cells. The cells in the lower side were counted and are graphed below. Scale bar represent 100 μm. Values represent the mean ± SD (N = 3). All experiments were repeated at least three times. * represent p < 0.05, ** represent p < 0.01. PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma; SD, standard deviation.

Ginsenoside Rf inhibits hypoxia-induced cellular migration of A549 cells via PPARγ. A549 cells were pretreated with ginsenoside Rf (10 μM) and/or T0070907 (5 μM) treatment for 1 h and incubated under hypoxia for 24 h. Cells that migrated through the membranes were fixed and counted using light microscopy. Bar graph shows relative migrated cells. The cells in the lower side were counted and are graphed below. Scale bar represent 100 μm. Values represent the mean ± SD (N = 3). All experiments were repeated at least three times. * represent p < 0.05, ** represent p < 0.01. PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma; SD, standard deviation.

Ginsenoside Rf has no estrogen receptor or AR transcriptional activity

To determine whether ginsenoside Rf induces other nuclear hormone receptors, estrogen receptor (ER) and AR transcriptional activities were examined. As shown in Fig. 4A, 17-β-estradiol , as a positive control, induced ERE-transcriptional activity at a concentration of 10 nM in MCF-7 cells. However, ginsenoside Rf did not induce ER transcriptional activity. We also analyzed the anti-ERE transcriptional activity of ginsenoside Rf (Fig. 4B). Ginsenoside Rf did not exhibit anti-ER transcriptional activity. Moreover, ginsenoside Rf was examined for ARE transcriptional activity (Fig. 4C). Ginsenoside Rf did not show AR transcriptional activity. Lastly, we checked for anti-ARE transcriptional activity of ginsenoside Rf (Fig. 4D). Ginsenoside Rf did not exhibit anti-AR transcriptional activity. These results suggest that ginsenoside Rf specifically activates PPARγ, not ER or AR.
Fig. 4

Effects of ginsenoside Rf on estrogen and androgen receptor transcriptional activation. (A) MCF-7 cells were transiently transfected with ERE-luciferase reporter gene. The following day, MCF-7 cells were cultured in medium containing vehicle or ginsenoside Rf (1–10 μM) and/or E2 (10 nM) for 24 h, and luciferase activities were determined. (B) MCF-7 cells were transiently transfected with ERE-luciferase reporter gene. The following day, MCF-7 cells were pretreated with vehicle or ginsenoside Rf (10 μM) or ICI 182,780 (1 μM) for 1 h and then treat E2 (500 pM) during 24 h, and luciferase activities were determined. (C) AR-Ecoscreen cells were stably transfected with AR and ARE-luciferase reporter gene. AR-Ecoscreen cells were cultured in medium containing vehicle or ginsenoside Rf (1–10 μM) or dihydrotestosterone (DHT) (1 nM) for 24 h, and luciferase activities were determined. (D) AR-Ecoscreen cells were pretreated with vehicle or ginsenoside Rf (10 μM) or CDX (5 μM) for 1 h and then treat DHT (1 nM) during 24 h, and luciferase activities were determined. Values represent the mean ± SD (N = 3). All experiments were repeated at least three times. * represents p < 0.05, ** represents p < 0.01, *** represents p < 0.001, p > 0.05 is indicated by “n.s.” for not significant. AR, androgen receptor; CDX, bicalutamide; ERE, estrogen response element; SD, standard deviation.

Effects of ginsenoside Rf on estrogen and androgen receptor transcriptional activation. (A) MCF-7 cells were transiently transfected with ERE-luciferase reporter gene. The following day, MCF-7 cells were cultured in medium containing vehicle or ginsenoside Rf (1–10 μM) and/or E2 (10 nM) for 24 h, and luciferase activities were determined. (B) MCF-7 cells were transiently transfected with ERE-luciferase reporter gene. The following day, MCF-7 cells were pretreated with vehicle or ginsenoside Rf (10 μM) or ICI 182,780 (1 μM) for 1 h and then treat E2 (500 pM) during 24 h, and luciferase activities were determined. (C) AR-Ecoscreen cells were stably transfected with AR and ARE-luciferase reporter gene. AR-Ecoscreen cells were cultured in medium containing vehicle or ginsenoside Rf (1–10 μM) or dihydrotestosterone (DHT) (1 nM) for 24 h, and luciferase activities were determined. (D) AR-Ecoscreen cells were pretreated with vehicle or ginsenoside Rf (10 μM) or CDX (5 μM) for 1 h and then treat DHT (1 nM) during 24 h, and luciferase activities were determined. Values represent the mean ± SD (N = 3). All experiments were repeated at least three times. * represents p < 0.05, ** represents p < 0.01, *** represents p < 0.001, p > 0.05 is indicated by “n.s.” for not significant. AR, androgen receptor; CDX, bicalutamide; ERE, estrogen response element; SD, standard deviation.

Docking modeling: ginsenoside Rf fits into the agonist binding site of PPARγ

To investigate whether ginsenoside Rf directly interacts with PPARγ, a molecular docking simulation of the interaction between ginsenoside Rf and PPARγ was performed (Fig. 5). For comparison, the binding pose of ginsenoside Rf was superimposed over the X-ray pose of BPR1H036, a known indole-based PPARγ agonist (Fig. 5B). The overall binding mode of ginsenoside Rf predicted by Surflex-Dock was similar to that of BPR1H036. In the X-ray structure, the carboxylate group in the polar head of BPR1H036 formed a hydrogen bond network with key residues of PPARγ, including SER289, HIS323, HIS449, and TYR473. The glucopyranoside group of ginsenoside Rf also occupied this site, forming two hydrogen bonds with SER289 and HIS449. This hydrogen bond pattern of the acidic polar head group is conserved in most PPARγ agonists, which is believed to be essential for the activity of the ligand. Moreover, the tetracyclic skeleton of ginsenoside Rf exhibited strong hydrophobic interactions with PPARγ, playing an important role in the binding of ginsenoside Rf to the protein. These results indicate that ginsenoside Rf may directly interact with PPARγ; however, further studies are required to confirm the binding mode of ginsenoside Rf to PPARγ.
Fig. 5

Binding pose of ginsenoside Rf in the active site of PPARγ. (A) Superimposition of the docked pose of ginsenoside Rf and the X-ray pose of reference compound BPR1H036 (PDB id: 2ATH). Ginsenoside Rf is rendered as violet stick, while BPR1H036 is orange stick. The surface of PPARγ is generated by MOLCAD program and depicted as mesh surface. (B) Docking pose of ginsenoside Rf in the active site of PPARγ. Ginsenoside Rf is rendered as violet stick, and the surrounding key residues are rendered as grey stick and labeled. Hydrogen bonds are depicted as dotted yellow lines. (C) 2D view of the interaction between ginsenoside Rf and PPARγ. PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma.

Binding pose of ginsenoside Rf in the active site of PPARγ. (A) Superimposition of the docked pose of ginsenoside Rf and the X-ray pose of reference compound BPR1H036 (PDB id: 2ATH). Ginsenoside Rf is rendered as violet stick, while BPR1H036 is orange stick. The surface of PPARγ is generated by MOLCAD program and depicted as mesh surface. (B) Docking pose of ginsenoside Rf in the active site of PPARγ. Ginsenoside Rf is rendered as violet stick, and the surrounding key residues are rendered as grey stick and labeled. Hydrogen bonds are depicted as dotted yellow lines. (C) 2D view of the interaction between ginsenoside Rf and PPARγ. PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma.

Discussion

Many studies have shown that KRG has antioxidant and antiinflammatory effects both in vitro and in vivo [37], [38]. We previously demonstrated that KRG inhibits hypoxia-induced COX-2 activation via PPARγ [30]. In search of the active constituent of KRG that inhibits hypoxia-induced COX-2, we found that ginsenoside Rf activates PPARγ and suppresses hypoxia-induced COX-2 via PPARγ. PPARγ is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily and is a ligand-dependent transcription factor [39]. PPARγ regulates glucose metabolism, fatty acid storage, and adipocyte differentiation and is a target of antidiabetic drugs [40], [41]. Several studies have shown that the ginsenosides Rg3 and Rh2 and compound K inhibit adipogenesis via the regulation of PPARγ and CCAAT/enhaancer-binding protein alpha expression in 3T3-L1 cells, human primary preadipocytes, and mice [42]. Indeed, it has been suggested that ginsenoside Rf binds directly to the active site of PPARγ [36]. However, these ginsenosides downregulate PPARγ and perilipin protein expression in 3T3-L1 cells, indicating an antiadipogenic effect [42]. It was recently recognized that PPARγ plays a fundamental role in the immune response through its ability to inhibit the expression of inflammatory cytokines and induce the differentiation of immune cells against antiinflammatory phenotypes [24]. Hesperetin, a flavanone from the fruit peel of Citrus aurantium L, exhibits strong antiinflammatory effects through the upregulation of PPARγ [43]. Moreover, fenretinide, a synthetic ligand of PPARγ, induces antiinflammatory activity, although its exact mechanism is not fully understood [44]. Our data are consistent with previous results demonstrating that ginsenoside Rf modulates PPARγ and appears to have distinct functions, such as antiadipogenesis and antiinflammation, according to the cell type. In our study, ginsenoside Rf specifically inhibited COX-2 expression via PPARγ activation under hypoxic conditions. The COX-2 suppression we observed may be because of the sum of the activities of each component and their interactions, as ginsenosides Rb1 and Rg1 elicited some response, albeit weaker than that of ginsenoside Rf. Moreover, the inhibition of COX-2 expression and cellular migration under hypoxia were dependent on PPARγ activation. The docking simulation results indicated that ginsenoside Rf binds to the active site of PPARγ; however, further studies are required to confirm the binding mode. These findings provide a mechanical explanation for the effects of ginsenoside Rf on metabolic disorders and cancer.

Conflicts of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
  42 in total

1.  Novel indole-based peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists: design, SAR, structural biology, and biological activities.

Authors:  Neeraj Mahindroo; Chien-Fu Huang; Yi-Huei Peng; Chiung-Chiu Wang; Chun-Chen Liao; Tzu-Wen Lien; Santhosh Kumar Chittimalla; Wei-Jan Huang; Chia-Hua Chai; Ekambaranellore Prakash; Ching-Ping Chen; Tsu-An Hsu; Cheng-Hung Peng; I-Lin Lu; Ling-Hui Lee; Yi-Wei Chang; Wei-Cheng Chen; Yu-Chen Chou; Chiung-Tong Chen; Chandra M V Goparaju; Yuan-Shou Chen; Shih-Jung Lan; Ming-Chen Yu; Xin Chen; Yu-Sheng Chao; Su-Ying Wu; Hsing-Pang Hsieh
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Direct transcriptional up-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 by hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 promotes colorectal tumor cell survival and enhances HIF-1 transcriptional activity during hypoxia.

Authors:  Abderrahmane Kaidi; David Qualtrough; Ann C Williams; Christos Paraskeva
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Ginsenoside Rf, a component of ginseng, regulates lipoprotein metabolism through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha.

Authors:  Hyunghee Lee; Frank J Gonzalez; Michung Yoon
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Differential modulation of COX-2 expression in A549 airway epithelial cells by structurally distinct PPAR(gamma) agonists: evidence for disparate functional effects which are independent of NF-(kappa)B and PPAR(gamma).

Authors:  Kajal M Patel; Karen L Wright; Paul Whittaker; Probir Chakravarty; Malcolm L Watson; Stephen G Ward
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 4.315

5.  Differentiation and authentication of Panax ginseng, Panax quinquefolius, and ginseng products by using HPLC/MS.

Authors:  T W Chan; P P But; S W Cheng; I M Kwok; F W Lau; H X Xu
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Anxiolytic activity of Panax ginseng roots: an experimental study.

Authors:  S K Bhattacharya; S K Mitra
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.360

7.  Tumor suppressor and anti-inflammatory actions of PPARgamma agonists are mediated via upregulation of PTEN.

Authors:  L Patel; I Pass; P Coxon; C P Downes; S A Smith; C H Macphee
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-dependent repression of the inducible nitric oxide synthase gene.

Authors:  M Li; G Pascual; C K Glass
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Peroxisome proliferators enhance cyclooxygenase-2 expression in epithelial cells.

Authors:  E A Meade; T M McIntyre; G A Zimmerman; S M Prescott
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-03-19       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Study on anti-androgenic effects of bisphenol a diglycidyl ether (BADGE), bisphenol F diglycidyl ether (BFDGE) and their derivatives using cells stably transfected with human androgen receptor, AR-EcoScreen.

Authors:  K Satoh; K Ohyama; N Aoki; M Iida; F Nagai
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.023

View more
  5 in total

1.  The Effects of Ginsenosides on the Nrf2 Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Milad Ashrafizadeh; Zahra Ahmadi; Habib Yaribeygi; Thozhukat Sathyapalan; Tannaz Jamialahmadi; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 2.  Hormesis and Ginseng: Ginseng Mixtures and Individual Constituents Commonly Display Hormesis Dose Responses, Especially for Neuroprotective Effects.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Comparative transcriptome analysis of the protective effects of Korean Red Ginseng against the influence of bisphenol A in the liver and uterus of ovariectomized mice.

Authors:  Jeonggeun Lee; Joonwoo Park; Yong Yook Lee; YoungJoo Lee
Journal:  J Ginseng Res       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 6.060

Review 4.  Pro-Resolving Effect of Ginsenosides as an Anti-Inflammatory Mechanism of Panax ginseng.

Authors:  Dong-Soon Im
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-03-13

5.  Network Pharmacology and Experimental Evidence: PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway is Involved in the Antidepressive Roles of Chaihu Shugan San.

Authors:  Shan Zhang; Yujia Lu; Wei Chen; Wei Shi; Qian Zhao; Jingjie Zhao; Li Li
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 4.162

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.