| Literature DB >> 30975128 |
Toshihide Hirai1, Hiroshi Kobayashi2, Toru Akiyama3, Tomotake Okuma4, Hiroyuki Oka5, Yusuke Shinoda1,6, Masachika Ikegami1, Yusuke Tsuda1, Takashi Fukushima3, Takahiro Ohki4, Yuki Ishibashi4, Ryoko Sawada1,6, Takahiro Goto4, Sakae Tanaka1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Schwannomas are well-encapsulated, benign neoplasms, and enucleation is a standard operation procedure. The incidence of neurological complications after surgical treatment for schwannomas of the extremities varies, and there is no consensus concerning predictive factors for complications. The aim of this study was to elucidate predictive factors for complications after surgical treatment of schwannomas that develop in the major nerves of the extremities.Entities:
Keywords: Complication; Enucleation; Extremities; Peripheral nerve; Schwannoma
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30975128 PMCID: PMC6460649 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2538-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Baseline characteristics (N = 141)
| Age, mean (range) | 56 (11–84) |
|---|---|
| Male | 72 (51.8%) |
| Tumor size, median (range) (cm) | 2.5 (1–10) |
| Preoperative symptoms | |
| Numbness | 10 (7.1%) |
| Tenderness | 101 (71.6%) |
| Radiating pain | 115 (81.6%) |
| Hypesthesia | 11 (7.8%) |
| Motor weakness | 6 (4.2%) |
| Duration of symptoms, | 12 (1–300) |
| median (range) (months) | |
| Schwannomatosis | 12 (8.6%) |
| Previous surgery | 3 (2.1%) |
| Degenerative changes on MR imaging | 49 (34.8%) |
| Tourniquet | 75 (53.2%) |
Tumor locations and complication number (Complication number/Total)
| Number | Locations | Number | Nerves involved | Number | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper limb | 29/60 | Upper arm | 15/26 | Brachial plexus | 3/5 |
| Elbow | 5/9 | Median | 13/21 | ||
| Forearm | 3/9 | Ulnar | 5/16 | ||
| Hand and wrist | 6/16 | Radial | 5/9 | ||
| Musculocutaneous | 1/2 | ||||
| Posterior interosseous | 1/1 | ||||
| Digital | 1/6 | ||||
| Lower limb | 20/81 | Buttock and groin | 0/2 | Obturator | 0/2 |
| Thigh | 3/19 | Sciatic | 2/7 | ||
| Knee | 6/17 | Femoral | 1/3 | ||
| Lower leg | 8/25 | Saphenous | 1/7 | ||
| Foot and ankle | 3/18 | Tibial | 8/24 | ||
| Common peroneal | 4/11 | ||||
| Deep peroneal | 1/2 | ||||
| Superficial peroneal | 0/8 | ||||
| Sural | 2/6 | ||||
| Plantar | 1/11 |
Predictive factors for postoperative complications
| Postoperative complications | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (−) | (+) | univariate | multivariate | ||
| Mean age | 52.2 | 59.3 | 0.03 | 0.06 | |
| Tumor size | 3.19 | 2.94 | 0.45 | ||
| Duration of | ≥12 months | 51 | 21 | 0.15 | 0.25 |
| symptoms | < 12 months | 41 | 28 | ||
| Preoperative motor | (−) | 89 | 46 | 0.41 | |
| weakness | (+) | 3 | 3 | ||
| Preoperative hypesthesia | (−) | 85 | 44 | 0.67 | |
| (+) | 6 | 5 | |||
| Schwannomatosis | (−) | 84 | 45 | 1.0 | |
| (+) | 8 | 4 | |||
| Previous surgery | (−) | 90 | 48 | 1.0 | |
| (+) | 2 | 1 | |||
| Degenerative changes | (−) | 59 | 31 | 0.9 | |
| on MR imaging | (+) | 32 | 17 | ||
| Tourniquet | (−) | 42 | 24 | 0.25 | |
| (+) | 50 | 25 | |||
| Location | Upper limb | 31 | 29 | 0.003 | 0.14 |
| Lower limb | 61 | 20 | |||
| Proximal | 46 | 27 | 0.59 | ||
| Distal | 46 | 22 | |||
| Nerve | Major motor | 59 | 44 | 0.001 | 0.03 |
| Others | 33 | 5 | |||
Fig. 1Correlation between nerve origin and postoperative complications. (a) Number of complications/total number of cases in previous reports and in the current study. (b) Comparison of complication rates between tumors originating from major motor nerves and others
Clinical course of motor weakness due to surgery
| MRC grading | Postoperative observation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Nerves involved | Preoperative | Postoperative | Final follow-up | period (months) |
| 1 | Median | 5 | 4 | 5 | 48 |
| 2 | Ulnar | 5 | 3 | 4 | 41 |
| 3 | Median | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| 4 | Radial | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 |
| 5 | Posterior interosseous | 4 | 2 | 4 | 96 |
| 6 | Common peroneal | 5 | 2 | 3 | 21 |
| 7 | Common peroneal | 4 | 0–1 | 2 | 16 |
| 8 | Tibial | 5 | 0–1 | 2 | 6 |
MRC Medical Research Council