| Literature DB >> 30974809 |
Irene Muñoz-González1, Esther Merino-Álvarez2, Marina Salvador3, Tatiana Pintado4, Claudia Ruiz-Capillas5, Francisco Jiménez-Colmenero6, Ana M Herrero7.
Abstract
Chia (Salvia hispanica L.) is an oilseed plant which contains proteins of high biological value and other healthy components with interesting technological properties. For these reasons, chia could be a promising option for the formation and stabilization of oil-in-water emulsions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the potential of chia protein (from chia flour) in the formation of emulsions. To that end, composition and technological and structural properties determined by infrared spectroscopy were investigated in conventional (EC) and gelled (EGC) emulsions with chia and compared with their corresponding soy protein emulsions with the same protein content [conventional (ES) or gelled (EGS)] used as reference. All emulsions containing chia had better fat and water binding properties than those elaborated with soy protein isolate (SPI). The color of the emulsions varied significantly depending on whether the emulsions were made with chia or SPI. EGS and EGC exhibited the greatest (p < 0.05) penetration force values, being EGC the firmest (p < 0.05). Depending on the type of emulsion, Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR)-FTIR Spectroscopy revealed differences in their lipid structure and interaction in terms of lipid acyl chain mobility (order/disorder) and emulsion droplet size. These structural characteristics could be related to the textural behavior of emulsions.Entities:
Keywords: chia protein; conventional emulsion; emulsion gel; lipid structure; technological properties
Year: 2019 PMID: 30974809 PMCID: PMC6630939 DOI: 10.3390/gels5020019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gels ISSN: 2310-2861
Formulation (%) of olive oil conventional emulsions and emulsion gels.
| Samples 2 | SPI 1 | Chia Flour | Water | Olive Oil | Gelling Agent | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sodium Alginate | CaSO4 | Sodium Pyrophosphate | |||||
| ES | 3.3 | 56.7 | 40 | ||||
| EC | 15.0 | 45.0 | 40 | ||||
| EGS | 3.3 | 54.7 | 40 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.54 | |
| EGC | 15.0 | 43.0 | 40 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.54 | |
1 soy protein isolate (SPI). 2 Conventional emulsions prepared with olive oil, water and soy protein isolate (ES) or chia flour (EC), and emulsion gels elaborated with olive oil, water and a gelling agent based on alginate, with soy protein isolate (EGS) or chia flour (EGC).
Figure 1Typical appearance of chia (EGC, left) and soy protein (EGS, right) emulsion gels. For sample denomination see Table 1.
Proximate analysis (%) of olive oil conventional emulsions and emulsion gels.
| Samples 1 | Moisture | Ash | Protein | Fat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ES | 57.09 ± 0.43 a | 0.17 ± 0.01 d | 2.40 ± 0.19 a | 37.31 ± 1.57 a |
| EC | 45.54 ± 0.16 c | 0.64 ± 0.05 c | 2.41 ± 0.01 a | 38.93 ± 1.05 a |
| EGS | 54.65 ± 0.51 b | 1.04 ± 0.01 b | 2.42 ± 0.16 a | 38.19 ± 1.26 a |
| EGC | 43.73 ± 0.15 d | 1.55 ± 0.05 a | 2.39 ± 0.02 a | 40.69 ± 1.20 a |
1 For sample denomination see Table 1. Means ± standard deviation. Different letters (a, b, c and d) in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Color [(L*) lightness, (a*) redness and (b*) yellowness)] and texture parameters [puncture force (PF, N) and gel strength (GS, Nmm)] of olive oil conventional emulsions and emulsion gels.
| Samples 1 | L* | a* | b* | PF | GS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ES | 57.16 ± 0.29 d | −0.15 ± 0.06 d | 22.94 ± 0.44 b | Nd ** | Nd ** |
| EC | 61.72 ± 1.00 c | 0.10 ± 0.03 c | 9.51 ± 0.44 d | 0.13 ± 0.01 c | 0.25 ± 0.02 c |
| EGS | 76.62 ± 0.47 a | 0.38 ± 0.04 b | 26.14 ± 0.20 a | 0.34 ± 0.02 b | 0.79 ± 0.07 b |
| EGC | 64.56 ± 0.97 b | 1.69 ± 0.14 a | 11.47 ± 0.39 c | 1.43 ± 0.07 a | 3.12 ± 0.40 a |
1 For sample denomination see Table 1. Means ± standard deviation. Different letters (a, b, c and d) in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). Nd **: Not detected.
Figure 2ATR-FTIR spectra in the 2980–2820 cm−1 region of conventional emulsions and emulsion gels. For sample denomination see Table 1.
Half-bandwidth values of the 2923 cm−1 (νasCH2) and 2854 cm−1 (νsCH2) bands of pure olive oil and conventional emulsions and emulsion gels, and relative area values of the OH stretching band (3220 cm−1) of water and conventional emulsions and emulsion gels.
| Samples 1 | Half-Bandwidth 2923 cm−1 (νasCH2) | Half-Bandwidth 2854 cm−1 (νsCH2) | Area 3220 cm−1 Band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Olive oil | 27.5 ± 0.1 c | 16.2 ± 0.2 a | - |
| Pure water | - | - | 0.427 ± 0.004 a |
| ES | 30.1 ± 0.2 a | 16.5 ± 0.3 a | 0.382 ± 0.002 b |
| EC | 31.3 ± 0.3 a | 16.5 ± 0.5 a | 0.379 ± 0.004 b |
| EGS | 28.9 ± 0.1 b | 16.9 ± 0.2 a | 0.365 ± 0.001 c |
| EGC | 29.3 ± 0.2 b | 16.4 ± 0.4 a | 0.343 ± 0.001 d |
1 For sample denomination see Table 1. Means ± standard deviation. Different letters (a, b, c and d) in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Typical spectrum of soy protein emulsion gel (EGS) and the Lorentzian OH stretching band components in the 3700–2950 cm−1 region. For sample denomination see Table 1.