Literature DB >> 30973834

Alloplastic Cranioplasty Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Comparing Outcomes With Titanium Mesh, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Polyether Ether Ketone, and Norian Implants in 3591 Adult Patients.

Jeremie D Oliver1, Joseph Banuelos2, Amjed Abu-Ghname2, Krishna S Vyas2, Basel Sharaf2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acquired defects of the cranium represent a reconstructive challenge in patients with calvarial bone loss due to trauma, infection, neoplasia, congenital malformations, or other etiologies. The objective of this study was to compare postoperative rates of infection, local complications, and allograft failures following cranioplasty reconstruction using titanium mesh (Ti), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), polyether ether ketone (PEEK), and Norian implants in adult patients.
METHODS: This constitutes the first systematic review of available literature on 4 different methods of alloplastic cranioplasty reconstruction, including Ti, PMMA, PEEK, and Norian implants, using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale guidelines for article identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion. Electronic literature search included Ovid MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Database. Pearson exact test was utilized at P < 0.05 level of significance (J.M.P. v11 Statistical Software).
RESULTS: A total of 53 studies and 3591 patients (mean age, 40.1 years) were included (Ti = 1429, PMMA = 1459, PEEK = 221, Norian = 482). Polymethyl methacrylate implants were associated with a significantly higher infection rate (7.95%, P = 0.0266) compared with all other implant types (6.05%). Polyether ether ketone implants were associated with a significantly higher local complication rate (17.19%, P = 0.0307, compared with 12.23% in all others) and the highest ultimate graft failure rate (8.60%, P = 0.0450) compared with all other implant types (5.52%).
CONCLUSIONS: This study qualifies as a preliminary analysis addressing the knowledge gap in rates of infection, local surgical complication, and graft failure in alloplastic cranioplasty reconstruction with different implant types in the adult population. Longer-term randomized trials are warranted to validate associations found in this study.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30973834     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  8 in total

1.  Deformation of cranioplasty titanium mesh in a paediatric patient following head trauma.

Authors:  Basel Sharaf; Malke Asaad; Joseph Banuelos; Jesse Meaike
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-06-11

2.  Porous polyetheretherketone microcarriers fabricated via hydroxylation together with cell-derived mineralized extracellular matrix coatings promote cell expansion and bone regeneration.

Authors:  Shuo Sun; Zixue Jiao; Yu Wang; Zhenxu Wu; Haowei Wang; Qingming Ji; Yi Liu; Zongliang Wang; Peibiao Zhang
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2021-03-19

3.  Calcium Phosphate Cement "Space Fill-in" Augmentation in Autologous Cranioplasty for Large Cranial Defect: Additional Technical Consideration and Its Long-term Follow-up.

Authors:  Ichiro Takumi; Masataka Akimoto
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Cranial Implants for Virtual Surgical Planning: An In-Vitro Study.

Authors:  Bilal Msallem; Michaela Maintz; Florian S Halbeisen; Simon Meyer; Guido R Sigron; Neha Sharma; Shuaishuai Cao; Florian M Thieringer
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Histological Processing of CAD/CAM Titanium Scaffold after Long-Term Failure in Cranioplasty.

Authors:  Heilwig Fischer; Claudius Steffen; Katharina Schmidt-Bleek; Georg N Duda; Max Heiland; Carsten Rendenbach; Jan-Dirk Raguse
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Subgaleal Effusion and Brain Midline Shift After Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Study Between Polyetheretherketone Cranioplasty and Titanium Cranioplasty After Decompressive Craniectomy.

Authors:  Tao Ji; Peiwen Yao; Yu Zeng; Zhouqi Qian; Ke Wang; Liang Gao
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-07-21

7.  Reconstruction of cranial defect with patient-specific implants: Four different cost-effective techniques.

Authors:  Dushyant Chauhan; Probodh Kumar Chattopadhyay; Ashish Thakur
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-04-20

8.  Outcome and risk factors of complications after cranioplasty with polyetheretherketone and titanium mesh: A single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Shun Yao; Qiyu Zhang; Yiying Mai; Hongyi Yang; Yilin Li; Minglin Zhang; Run Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 4.086

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.