Literature DB >> 30973504

Importance of Syndesmotic Reduction on Clinical Outcome After Syndesmosis Injuries.

Mette R Andersen1,2, Lien M Diep3, Frede Frihagen4, Johan Castberg Hellund5, Jan E Madsen2,4, Wender Figved1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship between syndesmosis reduction and outcome.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: One Level 1 and 1 Level 3 Trauma Center. PATIENTS: Ninety-seven patients with syndesmosis injury. INTERVENTION: Stabilization of syndesmosis injury. Open reduction and internal fixation of malleolar fracture, if present. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Anterior, central, and posterior measures of syndesmosis width on computed tomography scans, Olerud-Molander Ankle score, American Orthopaedic Foot and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot score, and range of motion measurements.
RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients completed 2 years of follow-up. The difference in anterior tibiofibular distance (aTFD) between the injured and noninjured ankle postoperatively had a significant effect on the Olerud-Molander Ankle score after 6 weeks [b = -2.6, 95% confidence interval (CI), -4.8 to -0.4; P = 0.02], 1 year (b = -2.7, 95% CI, -4.7 to -0.8; P < 0.001), and 2 years (b = -2.6, 95% CI, -4.6 to -0.6; P = 0.009) and on American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot score after 6 weeks (b = -2.2, 95% CI, -3.7 to -0.7; P = 0.004), 1 year (b = -1.7, 95% CI, -3.0 to -0.4; P = 0.04), and 2 years (b = -1.9, 95% CI, -3.2 to -0.5; P = 0.006). The effect of computed tomography measurements on range of motion was inconsistent. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrated that aTFD had adequate discriminatory performance (area under the ROC curve ≥ 0.7) 1 and 2 years after surgery and the central measurement at only 2 years after surgery. ROC analyses indicate a cutoff value for syndesmosis malreduction of 2 mm. The postoperative rate of malreduction was 32%.
CONCLUSIONS: The aTFD correlated with clinical outcome. A 2-mm difference in aTFD seems to predict poorer clinical outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30973504     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  12 in total

Review 1.  [Fractures of the anterolateral tibial rim : The fourth malleolus].

Authors:  Stefan Rammelt; Jan Bartoníček; Annika Pauline Neumann; Livia Kroker
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Fixation of anterolateral distal tibial fractures: the anterior malleolus.

Authors:  Stefan Rammelt; Jan Bartoníček; Tim Schepers; Livia Kroker
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 3.  Intraoperative Assessment of Reduction of the Ankle Syndesmosis.

Authors:  Kevin A Hao; Robert A Vander Griend; Jennifer A Nichols; Christopher W Reb
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-07-13

4.  Detection of fibular rotational changes in cone beam CT: experimental study in a specimen model.

Authors:  Nils Beisemann; Antonella M Tilk; Jula Gierse; Paul A Grützner; Jochen Franke; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Sven Y Vetter
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 2.795

5.  The utilization of intraoperative contralateral ankle images for syndesmotic reduction.

Authors:  Xiangquan Chu; Motasem Salameh; Seong-Eun Byun; Michael Hadeed; Steven Stacey; Cyril Mauffrey; Joshua A Parry
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-04-22

6.  CORR Insights®: Is the Fibular Station on Lateral Ankle Radiographs Symmetric? A Retrospective Observational Radiographic Study.

Authors:  Wayne S Berberian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging in ankle syndesmotic reduction.

Authors:  Markus Beck; Manuela Brunk; Alice Wichelhaus; Thomas Mittlmeier; Robert Rotter
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Randomized trial comparing suture button with single 3.5 mm syndesmotic screw for ankle syndesmosis injury: similar results at 2 years.

Authors:  Benedikte Wendt Ræder; Ingrid Kvello Stake; Jan Erik Madsen; Frede Frihagen; Silje Berild Jacobsen; Mette Renate Andersen; Wender Figved
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Need for syndesmotic fixation and assessment of reduction during ankle fracture fixation, with and without contralateral fluoroscopic images, has poor interobserver reliability.

Authors:  Motasem Salameh; Seong-Eun Byun; Xiangquan Chu; Michael Hadeed; August Funk; Steven Stacey; Cyril Mauffrey; Joshua A Parry
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-08-04

10.  Evidence-Based Surgical Treatment Algorithm for Unstable Syndesmotic Injuries.

Authors:  Markus Regauer; Gordon Mackay; Owen Nelson; Wolfgang Böcker; Christian Ehrnthaller
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.