Literature DB >> 30973400

Gastrointestinal Bleeding After HeartMate II or HVAD Implantation: Incidence, Location, Etiology, and Effect on Survival.

Masashi Kawabori1,2, Chitaru Kurihara1,2,3, Andre C Critsinelis1,2, Tadahisa Sugiura1,2, Yuji Kaku1,2, Andrew B Civitello1,2, Todd K Rosengart4, Jeffrey A Morgan1.   

Abstract

The number of patients on destination therapy is increasing as long-term survival on continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) therapy has improved. Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common complication after CF-LVAD implantation, and its risk correlates with longer support time, emphasizing the importance of GIB management. The lower pulsatility of CF-LVADs may promote arteriovenous malformations, which amplify the bleeding risk. Here, we retrospectively analyzed the location, incidence, and survival effect of GIB events in HeartMate II (HM-II) and HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD) recipients to provide specific details regarding these complications. From November 2003 to March 2016, 526 patients with chronic heart failure underwent primary implantation of an HM-II (n = 403) or HVAD (n = 123) CF-LVAD at our center. Of the 526 patients, 140 (26.6%) had a GIB event (HM-II: n = 100; HVAD: n = 40), 92 (17.5%) had a single GIB event, and 48 (9.1%) had multiple GIB events (range: 2-9 events). HVAD recipients had a higher incidence of both upper and lower GIB events (p < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively) than HM-II recipients. Arteriovenous malformation was the most common etiology for GIB (50 patients/72 events); for this group, the average time-to-event was 300.4 days, the recurrence rate was 34%, and the 90-day and 1-year survival rates were 88.3% and 66.7%, respectively. Age at implantation was the only predictor of GIB. In conclusion, our study provides detailed information about GIB events associated with current CF-LVADs. Additional studies are required to evaluate strategies to reduce the incidence of GIB morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 30973400     DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  5 in total

1.  Bleeding in critical care associated with left ventricular assist devices: pathophysiology, symptoms, and management.

Authors:  F W G Leebeek; R Muslem
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2019-12-06

2.  Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Support in Patients with Ischemic Versus Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Brendan P Chou; Andre Critsinelis; Harveen K Lamba; Gregory Long; Andrew B Civitello; Reynolds M Delgado; Subhasis Chatterjee
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2021-09-01

3.  The Lebanese left ventricular assist device experience, a success story despite the odds.

Authors:  R Hamdan; S Fakih; M Mohammad; F Charif; H Abdallah; S Safa; F Al Ali; M Issa; B Damen; A El Zein; M Younes; A Rabah; M Saab
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 1.637

4.  Postimplant Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors Use Is Associated With Lower Rates of Thrombotic Events After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Authors:  Andrew Xanthopoulos; Konstantinos Tryposkiadis; Filippos Triposkiadis; Kiyotaka Fukamachi; Edward G Soltesz; James B Young; Kathy Wolski; Eugene H Blackstone; Randall C Starling
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Severe Pulmonary Bleeding after Assist Device Implantation: Incidence, Risk Factors and Prognostic Impact.

Authors:  Bernd Panholzer; Kevin Pilarczyk; Katharina Huenges; Charlotte Aldinger; Christine Friedrich; Ulrike Nowak-Göttl; Jochen Cremer; Assad Haneya
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.