Literature DB >> 3097333

Cost effectiveness of the antibiotic removal device for processing blood cultures.

M I de Silva, S M Qadri, E Hood.   

Abstract

The antimicrobial removal device (ARD) blood culture system has been reported to increase the sensitivity of isolation of pathogenic microorganisms in bacteremic patients who are already on antibiotics. To determine the usefulness of this system to the clinician for the diagnosis of bacteremia and to determine the additional cost incurred by the use of the system, the microbiological results at two hospitals over a period of two years were compared. A total of 25,124 standard blood cultures (SBC) were performed with a positive culture rate of 10.7 percent. Of the 858 specimens processed by ARD alone, 68 (7.9 percent) were positive. There were a total of 2,657 specimens from 910 patients that were processed simultaneously using both systems. Both ARD and SBC were negative in 2,249 specimens, and 290 blood cultures from 107 patients grew the same organism using both systems. Thirty-one specimens from 12 patients grew pathogenic bacteria from ARD bottles; in each the SBC culture was negative. However, in 21 patients (44 specimens) bacteremia was detected only in SBC with negative cultures from ARD bottles.Thus, in the vast majority of the cases, SBC alone was sufficient to detect bacteremia, even in the patient with recent or concomitant antibiotic therapy. The total processing cost was calculated for the cases in which SBC and ARD were performed simultaneously and was found to be $6,588 for SBC and $15,005 for ARD. The comparative cost per bacteremic patient detected by the two methods was $46.40 for SBC and $555.75 for ARD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3097333      PMCID: PMC2571373     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  8 in total

1.  Practical aerobic membrane filtration blood culture technique: clinical blood culture trial.

Authors:  N M Sullivan; V L Sutter; S M Finegold
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Factors affecting mortality of patients with bacteremia.

Authors:  R M Kluge; H L DuPont
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1973-08

3.  The importance of volume of blood cultured in the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

Authors:  D M Ilstrup; J A Washington
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  Resin-process methods for improved isolation of organisms from blood and other body fluids.

Authors:  S L Hansen; J Hetmanski; B J Stewart
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-07-28       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  The antimicrobial removal device. A microbiological and clinical evaluation.

Authors:  A J Wright; R L Thompson; C A McLimans; W R Wilson; J A Washington
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Controlled evaluation of the volume of blood cultured in detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

Authors:  J H Tenney; L B Reller; S Mirrett; W L Wang; M P Weinstein
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Gram-negative bacteremia. III. Reassessment of etiology, epidemiology and ecology in 612 patients.

Authors:  B E Kreger; D E Craven; P C Carling; W R McCabe
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Media-dependent antagonism of gentamicin sulfate by Liquoid (sodium polyanetholsulfonate).

Authors:  W H Traub; B L Lowrance
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1969-11-15
  8 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Clinical implications of positive blood cultures.

Authors:  C S Bryan
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 26.132

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.